Pre-publication of chapter XXVII of my forthcoming book “Turkey is Iran and Iran is Turkey – 2500 Years of indivisible Turanian – Iranian Civilization distorted and estranged by Anglo-French Orientalists”; chapters XXVII, XXVIII, XXIX, XXX, XXXI and XXXII form Part Eleven (How and why the Ottomans, the Safavids and the Mughals failed) of the book, which is made of 12 parts and 33 chapters.
Until now, 16 chapters have been uploaded as partly pre-publication of the book; the present chapter is therefore the 17th (out of 33). At the end of the present pre-publication, the entire Table of Contents is made available. Pre-published chapters are marked in blue color, and the present chapter is highlighted in gray color.
In addition, a list of all the already pre-published chapters (with the related links) is made available at the very end, after the Table of Contents.
The book is written for the general readership with the intention to briefly highlight numerous distortions made by the racist, colonial academics of Western Europe and North America only with the help of absurd conceptualization and preposterous contextualization.
———————–
Topkapı Palace, Ottoman Constantinople
Ali Qapu Palace, Safavid Isfahan
Western historiography enters a stage of exorbitant falsification when attempting to reconstitute the History of the Safavid dynasty of Iran (1501-1736). What stands at the forefront of the Western forgery and distortion of the History of Iran during the said period is the theory that the Safavid dynasty was ‘Shia’, and also that they ‘converted’ the Turanian population of 16th c. Iran to ‘Shia Islam’. Of course, such fictional conversion never took place, and the Safavid rulers would reject the fake division of Islam into two denominations, since they always proclaimed their Islamic authenticity and integrity, fully refuting the concept of a ‘divided Islam’.
However, this fake division is instrumental for the colonial distortion of History, because on this fallacy hinges the entire Western involvement in the Orient and the conflicts that the criminal and evil states of England, France and America generated across Afro-Eurasia. In order to fully and irreversibly embed the vicious divisive scheme of a supposedly bi-polar Islamic world revolving around two rival empires, namely the ‘Sunni’ Ottomans and the ‘Shia’ Safavids, the Western Orientalists, agents, explorers, diplomats, and statesmen invented the fallacy of the so-called “Safavid conversion of Iran to Shia Islam”.
Of course, at the time (: early 16th c.), the Western colonial powers did not have the chance to impose their false version of History on the Ottomans and the Safavids; they even had not developed Oriental studies properly speaking in their already established pernicious universities. At the time, History was in the making. The only thing that the colonial empires could do, and which they viciously did, was to frame the divisive plot and to pull their diplomatic strings in order to trigger as many Ottoman – Safavid wars as they could. The distortive interpretation and the evil misrepresentation of these facts would come later – in due course of time.
And the malignant fallacy ‘happened’ truly when it ‘should’ have; when the collapsing Ottoman and Iranian empires were eroded through colonial infiltration and evil subversion, then the colonial gangsters and the 19th c. Orientalists started carrying out the projection of the already preconceived forgery onto the Western powers’ local stooges, who by means of shameful bribery and high treason (termed as ‘scholarships for studies in Western Europe’) started diffusing pathetic nonsense and bogus-academic lies in their respective countries only to fit the needs of their masters, namely the colonial powers. At the last stage, the monstrous and murderous forgery of France and England was presented as “History” worldwide only because their colonial empires subjugated almost the entire world and imposed the racist Anglo-French intellectual-academic contamination.
So, the historical forgery that the Western academic murderers have been teaching for over two centuries in their bogus-universities as “Oriental History” is merely the coverage of their inhuman deeds, which plunged Afro-Eurasia into ceaseless local and regional wars, countless rebellions, and two world wars. But the original concept behind the inhuman diplomacy of England and France was already there at the beginning of the 16th c., when they started fallaciously calling Iran, namely a totally Turanian country, “Persia”; this was preposterous. Soon afterwards, they started also naming the Ottoman Empire “Turkey”, which is another expression of their evilness and forgery, because the Ottoman Empire was in reality the most anti-Turkic state in World History.
No less than eight (8) times the Ottoman Empire and Safavid Iran came to war during the period of 235 years of Safavid rule over Iran. Actually, the wars started in 1514 and ended 1736 with the fall of the Safavids; of course, the historical fact of 8 wars does not mean in this case only 8 years consumed in wars! Most of these wars lasted many years. And actually, the Ottoman-Iranian wars did not end with the demise of the Safavid dynasty. Wars were resumed at the times of the Turanian Afsharid dynasty of Iran (1736-1796) and also during the period of the Turanian Qajar dynasty of Iran (1789-1925). So, from 1514 until 1823, in only 309 years, the Ottoman Empire and the Iranian Empire made eleven (11) wars one upon the other. In total, during 309 years, the two empires were engaged in wars against one another for no less than 81 years. About:
If one takes also into consideration the fact that both empires made many other wars with numerous neighboring empires (such as the Mughal Empire, the lately risen Russian Empire, and the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation) and several colonial kingdoms (Spain, Portugal, France, England, etc.), one concludes easily why the two empires gradually collapsed. Furthermore, taking into account first, the diplomatically instigated and deliberately machinated twelve (12) wars between the Ottomans and the Russian Empire, which took place during a period of 350 years (1568-1918) and lasted for no less than 57 years, and second, the five (5) wars between the Iranians and the Russians, which occurred over the span of 177 years (1651-1828) and kept going for 19 years, one can plainly assess the evilness of the divisive intrigues that the Western European colonial diplomats instigated across Afro-Eurasia, and the unprecedented bloodshed that they caused.
Gate of Felicity (Bâbüssaâde), Topkapı Palace, Ottoman Constantinople
Chehel Sotoun Palace, Safavid Isfahan
Imperial Hall with the throne of the sultan, Topkapı Palace, Ottoman Constantinople
Central Hall, Chehel Sotoun Palace, Safavid Isfahan
Open recess (iwan) of the Yerevan Kiosk, Topkapı Palace, Ottoman Constantinople
Chehel Sotoun Palace, Safavid Isfahan
Scene from the Surname-ı Vehbi, located in the Topkapı palace, Ottoman Constantinople
Battle of Chaldiran (1514); Grand painting at the Chehel SotounPalace (despite the fact that the battle ended with Ottoman victory), Safavid Isfahan
The Third Courtyard of the Topkapı Palace in the Ottoman Constantinople, as depicted in a miniature of the Hünername, 1584
Paintings in the main hall of the Chehel Sotoun Palace,Safavid Isfahan
All the wars, which were machinated and instigated by the colonial English and French diplomacies, needed a sophisticated coverage, e.g. some fake reasons, which would ‘explain’ or ‘justify’ to anyone why these wars happened (or ‘had’ to happen). To be convincingly fake, these reasons were based on a total distortion of the identity of both empires, the Ottoman and the Safavid; these distorted identities, which ‘explained’ the Ottoman – Safavid wars to the average public opinion in Europe at the time, became later the vertebral column of the fallacious Western Orientalism and its entirely fake branches, namely Turkology and Iranology.
To describe the extent and the depth of the Western Orientalist fallacy, suffice it that I herewith state the following: a major topic for Turkologists to study should become the Safavid Empire of Iran as a Turanian state, because it was ethnically a Turanian Empire whereby the outright majority of the population used to speak diverse Turkic languages as their native tongues.
Similarly, a major topic for Iranologists to study should become the Ottoman Empire, because an overwhelmingly Iranian culture permeated the state to such extent that, when Mehmet II entered Constantinople on 29th May 1453 and proceeded to the Palace of the Eastern Roman Emperors, the first words that he uttered were neither in Ottoman Turkish nor in Medieval Greek nor in Arabic, but in the classical, literary language of all Turanians, i.e. in Farsi.
The spider is curtain-bearer in the palace of Chosroes;
the owl sounds the relief in the castle of Afrasiyab.
These verses written c. 180 years before the conquest of Constantinople (1453) by the great Iranian poet Saadi (known as Saadi Shirazi, 1210-1291) reveal
– the absolutely identical nature of the Turanians and the Iranians,
– the common cultural background of all Iranian and Turanian nations,
– key elements of the Iranian-Turanian apocalyptic and soteriological eschatology,
– the last moments of the ailing Iranian rule (Chosroes: the last major Sassanid emperor Khusraw Parvez; 570-628), and
Mehmed II, by uttering these verses, clearly indicated that he viewed his victory in terms of Iranian-Turanian culture and eschatology, before all the other eventual or hypothetical parameters involved in the topic (Palaeologi-Ottoman imperial family rivalry; Christian-Muslim religious conflict; Eastern Roman-Turkic ethnic quarrel; economic interests).
In fact, there should have never existed Turkology and Iranology within the context of Western Orientalism, if this unit of academic disciplines were to serve the true purpose of exploration and search for the historical truth. The reason is simple: Turan and Iran have always been an indivisible historical – cultural entity.
However, the false portrait of the Ottoman and the Safavid empires, which had been systematically produced by the 16th c. colonial powers, involved two dimensions of distortion of the reality, namely religious and ethnic. Then, 19th and 20th c. French and English academics and explorers misinterpreted the 16th c. Ottoman – Safavid wars that their countries’ duplicitous diplomats had instigated as of both, religious and ethnic, reasons; and in both cases, these scholars lied, pretty much like today’s Orientalists lie when presenting, teaching and propagating the following forgery: “Sunni Turkish Ottomans vs. Shia Persian Safavids”.
In fact, at the beginning of the 16th c., with the exception of Eastern Iranians (namely the Tajik / Dari speaking populations), there was not one Persian ethnic alive; Iran had already been almost entirely Turanized at the ethnic-linguistic level. Farsi was a highly respected and widely used language of Literature, History, Spirituality, Art, Architecture and Culture that all the educated people felt obliged to learn in young age at the various madrasas of the cities, the towns and the villages of Iran. But in reality, Farsi was at the time a dead language like Latin in 16th c. Germany.
Only later and mainly during the 20th c., following the aggressive and extensive English involvement and the shameful colonial rule of Iran, which was carried out by local puppets, a ‘new’, systematized ‘modern education’ was imposed on all Iranians, the true, traditional Iranian History (based on Ferdowsi, Nezami Ganjavi and many other illustrious epic poets) was forcefully and calamitously replaced by the fake, materialistic, atheistic and evil Iranian ‘History’ of the Orientalists, and Farsi became obligatorily the meaningless ‘national’ language. These tasks have been completed by the pathetically ignorant, uneducated and charlatanesque soldiers, who were later called “Pahlavi dynasty shahs”.
The Universal Empire of Iran disappeared, and a fake, nationalistic, ‘Persian’ pseudo-kingdom was established only to implement the ensuing culturally anti-Iranian and ethnically anti-Turanian, nationalist tyranny. It was a villainous Freemasonic plot and eschatological conspiracy against Iran, involving many ulcerous English, French, American and other enemies of Imperial Iran, who postured as ‘friends’ of ‘Persia’ or ‘admirers’ of the ‘Persian civilization’. They only wanted to fool the Iranians and to insult Iran diachronically, after the absurd and abominable example given by ancient rascals like Herodotus and Aeschylus.
While the rocambolesque and even wacky Pahlavi pseudo-dynasty was in power, the criminal English colonials prepared their substitute, namely several pseudo-theologians, who composed pathetic theoretical systems, triggered absurd religious fanaticism, and engulfed the entire Iranian nation in colonial dilemmas and utmost confusion of political nature. Farsi, as the language of the systematized Western education, was indeed revivified particularly among the incessantly increasing urban populations, who started forgetting their native tongues, notably Azeri, Turkmen and other.
During the time of the Pahlavi bogus-Iranian ‘shahs’ (1925-1979), a ‘white’, nationalist terror was imposed on the misfortunate nation; the use of other languages was strictly prohibited. However, this linguistic revival is a fake, and it looks like an awakening of the mummy. The people, who speak Farsi as a native language in today’s Iran, are of Turanian ethnic origin in their outright majority; even worse, their culture is entirely Turanian–Iranian, and their most celebrated rulers and beloved emperors are all Turanians, like Shah Isma’il I, the founder of the Safavid dynasty.
This does not mean that there are not several genuine Iranian languages spoken today in Iran by native speakers; of course, there are many: they speak Baluch, Lori, Bakhtiari, Gorani, Faili, Kalhori, Gilani, Laki, Talysh, etc. But these ethno-linguistic groups represent rather small minorities in Iran. These populations are certainly of Iranian ethnic origin, but they share the common Iranian-Turanian culture with all the populations of Turanian ethnic origin in Iran and in many other countries.
The present situation in Iran looks strange and absurd to all the local victims of the diffusion of Western propaganda of educational-academic-intellectual character; in fact, the systematic propagation of the erroneous Western notion of ‘nation’ or ‘ethnic group’ triggered only troubles and conflicts. This noxious development relates to the inhuman intellectual perversion that is called ‘Enlightenment’ in the Western world. This consists in intellectual darkness and educational paranoia that caused numerous wars over the past 250 years.
For millennia, various ethnic groups -Iranian and Turanian- speaking different languages, shared always their common culture and tradition without feeling or caring about the unsubstantiated and otherwise nonexistent, fake borders and the evil division lines that the 18th c. Western European concept of ‘nation’ produced worldwide. This historical reality of Turanian-Iranian indivisibility was irrevocable within the universal Iranian Empire, which was the supreme blessing of God and the best present that the divine world had bestowed upon Mankind.
Whatever fallacy the Western Orientalists may eventually invent and include in their often nonsensical bibliography falls apart in the light of all historical sources and texts. If the modern Western academia and intellectuals cannot understand the true reality, this is due to their degenerate minds, the advanced rottenness of their decomposed educational and social structures, and the nauseating putrefaction of their moral core.
Then, the fabrication of the fake divide “Turks vs. Persians” helped the criminal colonial powers spread divisions among the Turanians of Western, Central, Southern and Northern Asia, and the Caucasus region. The parallel creation of the fake divide “Sunni Muslims vs. Shia Muslims” was instrumental in plunging the entire Islamic world in permanent strife. Then, the combined fallacy “Sunni Turkish Ottomans vs. Shia Persian Safavids” is an explosive mixture geared to prolong and perpetuate the catastrophic division of all the populations living between the Bosporus and the Indus River Delta.
However, if they destroy the evil deeds of the local puppets of the Anglo-Saxon colonial governments, these populations could triumphantly unite in a secular super-state of ca. 450 million people and thus become the new superpower and Western Asia’s real locomotive of nations. Alternatively, if the existing colonial divisions are allowed to further exist, they can trigger new fratricidal wars among the Turks, who are culturally Iranian, and the Iranians, who are ethnically Turks.
For all the aforementioned national divisions and historical distortions to be duly presented and propagated worldwide by the Western historical forgers in a complete manner, a key point had to be invented: the supposed Safavid conversion of Iran to ‘Shia Islam’. This Orientalist fallacy hinges of the misrepresentation of the mystical Safavid Order, which founded an entire empire for themselves: the Turanian Empire of Safavid Iran.
However, the falsification of the identity and the deeds of the Safavid Order would never be successfully undertaken worldwide, if the entire Western world was not already totally confused about two totally different issues, which were systematically presented to the average people of all the Western countries as supposedly ‘one’ by their religious, academic and intellectual authorities alike: spirituality and religion.
Nevertheless, spirituality and religion are totally distinct activities of the spiritual and the material hypostases of the human being.
Sultanahmet Square in Ottoman Constantinople: the Eastern Roman hippodrome and Obelisk of Theodosius, which was transported from Luxor
Naqsh-e Jahan Square in Safavid Isfahan
Procession of the guilds in the hippodrome as per a miniature of the Surname-i Vehbi (1582)
Naqsh-e Jahan, the imperial square in Safavid Isfahan
—————- BLUE MOSQUE, OTTOMAN CONSTANTINOPLE —————-
Blue mosque (Sultan Ahmet Camii): built between 1609 and 1617
Blue mosque, part of the interior decoration
Blue mosque, the mihrab (center) and the minbar (right)
—————– SHAH MOSQUE, SAFAVID ISFAHAN —————————-
Shah Mosque (Masjid-e Shah): built between 1611 and 1629
The winter hypostyle
The dome
——————————————————–
FORTHCOMING
Turkey is Iran and Iran is Turkey
2500 Years of indivisible Turanian – Iranian Civilization distorted and estranged by Anglo-French Orientalists
By Prof. Muhammet Şemsettin Gözübüyükoğlu
(Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREFACE
CONTENTS
PART ONE. INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER I: A World held Captive by the Colonial Gangsters: France, England, the US, and the Delusional History Taught in their Deceitful Universities
A. Examples of fake national names
a) Mongolia (or Mughal) and Deccan – Not India!
b) Tataria – Not Russia!
c) Romania (with the accent on the penultimate syllable) – Not Greece!
d) Kemet or Masr – Not Egypt!
e) Khazaria – not Israel!
f) Abyssinia – not Ethiopia!
B. Earlier Exchange of Messages in Turkish
C. The Preamble to My Response
CHAPTER II: Geopolitics does not exist.
CHAPTER III: Politics does not exist.
CHAPTER IV: Turkey and Iran beyond politics and geopolitics: Orientalism, conceptualization, contextualization, concealment
A. Orientalism
B. Conceptualization
C. Contextualization
D. Concealment
PART TWO. EXAMPLE OF ACADEMICALLY CONCEALED, KEY HISTORICAL TEXT
CHAPTER V: Plutarch and the diffusion of Ancient Egyptian and Iranian Religions and Cultures in Ancient Greece
PART THREE. TURKEY AND IRAN BEYOND POLITICS AND GEOPOLITICS: REJECTION OF THE ORIENTALIST, TURKOLOGIST AND IRANOLOGIST FALLACIES ABOUT ACHAEMENID HISTORY
CHAPTER VI: The fallacy that Turkic nations were not present in the wider Mesopotamia – Anatolia region in pre-Islamic times
CHAPTER VII: The fallacious representation of Achaemenid Iran by Western Orientalists
CHAPTER VIII: The premeditated disconnection of Atropatene / Adhurbadagan from the History of Azerbaijan
CHAPTER IX: Iranian and Turanian nations in Achaemenid Iran
CHAPTER X: Iranian and Turanian Religions in Pre-Islamic Iran
PART FOUR. FALLACIES ABOUT THE SO-CALLED HELLENISTIC PERIOD, ALEXANDER THE GREAT, AND THE SELEUCID & THE PARTHIAN ARSACID TIMES
CHAPTER XI: Alexander the Great as Iranian King of Kings, the fallacy of Hellenism, and the nonexistent Hellenistic Period
CHAPTER XII: Parthian Turan: an Anti-Persian dynasty
CHAPTER XIII: Parthian Turan and the Philhellenism of the Arsacids
PART FIVE. FALLACIES ABOUT SASSANID HISTORY, HISTORY OF RELIGIONS, AND THE HISTORY OF MIGRATIONS
CHAPTER XIV: Arsacid & Sassanid Iran, and the wars against the Mithraic – Christian Roman Empire
CHAPTER XV: Sassanid Iran – Turan, Kartir, Roman Empire, Christianity, Mani and Manichaeism
CHAPTER XVI: Iran – Turan, Manichaeism & Islam during the Migration Period and the Early Caliphates
PART SIX. FALLACIES ABOUT THE EARLY EXPANSION OF ISLAM: THE FAKE ARABIZATION OF ISLAM
CHAPTER XVII: Iran – Turan and the Western, Orientalist distortions about the successful, early expansion of Islam during the 7th – 8th c. CE
CHAPTER XVIII: Western Orientalist falsifications of Islamic History: Identification of Islam with only Hejaz at the times of the Prophet
CHAPTER XIX: The fake, Orientalist Arabization of Islam
CHAPTER XX: The systematic dissociation of Islam from the Ancient Oriental History
PART SEVEN. THE FICTIONAL DIVISION OF ISLAM INTO ‘SUNNI’ AND ‘SHIA’
CHAPTER XXI: The fabrication of the fake divide ‘Sunni Islam vs. Shia Islam’
PART EIGHT. THE DISTORTED TERM ‘PERSIANATE’
CHAPTER XXII: The fake Persianization of the Abbasid Caliphate
PART NINE. FALLACIES ABOUT THE GOLDEN ERA OF THE ISLAMIC CIVILIZATION
CHAPTER XXIII: From Ferdowsi to the Seljuk Turks, Nizam al Mulk, Nizami Ganjavi, Jalal ad-Din Rumi and Haji Bektash
PART TEN. FALLACIES ABOUT THE TIMES OF TURANIAN (MONGOLIAN) SUPREMACY IN TERMS OF SCIENCES, ARTS, LETTERS, SPIRITUALITY AND IMPERIAL UNIVERSALISM
CHAPTER XXIV: From Genghis Khan, Nasir al-Din al Tusi and Hulagu to Timur
CHAPTER XXV: Timur (Tamerlane) as a Turanian Muslim descendant of the Great Hero Manuchehr, his exploits and triumphs, and the slow rise of the Turanian Safavid Order
CHAPTER XXVI: the Timurid Era as Peak of the Islamic Civilization, Shah Rukh, and Ulugh Beg, the Astronomer Emperor
PART ELEVEN. HOW AND WHY THE OTTOMANS, THE SAFAVIDS AND THE MUGHALS FAILED
CHAPTER XXVII: Ethnically Turanian Safavids & Culturally Iranian Ottomans: two identical empires that mirrored one another
CHAPTER XXVIII: Spirituality, Religion & Theology: the fallacy of the Safavid conversion of Iran to ‘Shia Islam’
CHAPTER XXIX: Selim I, Ismail I, and Babur
CHAPTER XXX: The Battle of Chaldiran (1514), and how it predestined the Fall of the Islamic World
CHAPTER XXXI: Ottomans, Safavids and Mughals: victims of their sectarianism, tribalism, theology, and wrong evaluation of the colonial West
CHAPTER XXXII: Ottomans, Iranians and Mughals from Nader Shah to Kemal Ataturk
PART TWELVE. CONCLUSION
CHAPTER XXXIII: Turkey and Iran beyond politics and geopolitics: whereto?
—————————————————
List of the already pre-published chapters of the book
Lines separate chapters that belong to different parts of the book.
CHAPTER X: Iranian and Turanian Religions in Pre-Islamic Iran
CHAPTER XXV: Timur (Tamerlane) as a Turanian Muslim descendant of the Great Hero Manuchehr, his exploits and triumphs, and the slow rise of the Turanian Safavid Order
Фальшивая геополитика, фальсификация истории Османской империи и несуществующий неоосманизм
Sahte Jeopolitik, Osmanlı İmparatorluğu Tarihinin Sahtekarlığı ve Var Olmayan Yeni-Osmanlıcılık
Оглавление
I. Геополитика: фальшивая наука
II. Фальсификация истории Османской империи
III. Нелепая беатификация убогих османов, злейших врагов турок
IV. Примеры туркменского, анатолийского и мусульманского неприятия османского псевдосуннитского богословия
V. Западный миф об «Османской империи»
İçindekiler
I. Jeopolitik: Sahte Bir Bilim
II. Osmanlı İmparatorluğu Tarihinin Sahtekarlığı
III. Türklerin En Kötü Düşmanları olan Sefil Osmanlıların Gülünç Kutsaması
IV. Türkmen, Anadolu ve Müslümanların Osmanlı Sözde-Sünni Teolojisini Reddetme Örnekleri
V. ‘Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nun Batılı Miti
Table of Contents
I. Geopolitics: a Fake Science
II. The Falsification of the History of the Ottoman Empire
III. The Ridiculous Beatification of the Squalid Ottomans, the Worst Enemies of the Turks
IV. Examples of Turkmen, Anatolian and Muslim Rejection of the Ottoman Pseudo-Sunni Theology
V. The Western Myth of the ‘Ottoman Empire’
The modern ‘science’ of geopolitics is an entirely fake doctrine which promotes biased interpretations of geographical data out of any historical relevance; matched with colonially forged History, it generates enormous troubles, plunging billions of people into unnecessary wars, endless conflicts, sectarian clashes, confused education, false national identity, cultural disintegration, and moral depravity.
A while back, a Somali friend sent me the article of a Romanian ‘geopolitical analyst’ about the so-called ‘Neo-Ottomanist’ trend in today’s derailed, gravely endangered, and seriously menaced Turkey. Upon reading the title of the publication, I exploded in laughter!
First, geopolitics is a nonexistent science or, if you prefer, a pseudo-science.
Second, how can one possibly be ‘Ottomanist’ or even ‘Neo-Ottomanist’, when the historical truth about the Ottoman Empire is virtually unknown, partly concealed, and viciously falsified?
By declaring yourself as ‘Neo-Ottomanist’, you guarantee that you don’t have a clue about what you are. You are an idiot.
By declaring yourself as ‘an enemy of the Neo-Ottomanism’, you certify that you don’t have an idea about what happens around you. You are an imbecile.
Idiots and imbeciles are not born as such; they are gradually produced within an evil society mainly because of their mistake not to examine everything meticulously, not to reject everything that they hear or read, and not to carry out an austere self-criticism every single day.
This is the fate of the people – of those who consider themselves ‘Neo-Ottomanists’ and of those who oppose them. This is so because when ignorance prevails, simply you are nothing more than a feather blown in the wind. These misfortunate people will plunge into strife, clash, wars, and hatred only due to their delusions, sick dreams, calamitous ignorance, and spiritual misery.
The failure to apply an austere self-criticism, the fake concept of post-Enlightenment ‘patriotism’ (let alone nationalism or chauvinism), the false History taught in the schools and propagated by publishing houses, mass media, and cinematography, the confusion between spirituality and theology, and the impermissible association of religion with politics leads people to death in this world, and to Hell in the Hereafter.
What follows is my response to my suave Somali friend.
————— Response to a Somali friend —————————
Dear Bischara,
Thank you for your email of 7th May, feedback, attachment and your questions!
I went through the paper that you sent me.
I. Geopolitics: a Fake Science
Please, do not be so naïve as to believe that you will learn anything true, succinct and worthwhile through most of the billions of the books and the articles that you can find online or in hard copies. You are living in a fake world; a fake world has fake sciences. Geopolitics is just one of them.
There is no such a science — in striking contrast with Egyptology, Assyriology, Iranology, etc. which are real academic disciplines examining the past of the respective countries / nations / civilizations.
If you uttered the fake, ridiculous and meaningless word «geopolitics» before 170 years, suggesting that it is a ‘science’, all the then scholars would laugh at you. But those scholars in the middle of the 19th c. were far better than, and truly superior to, those of today.
Only subliminal manipulations make the average people of today to be stupid enough to believe that there is evolution of species (in the manner it is claimed), that there is real progress from the past to the present and the future, that people now are more knowledgeable than in the past, that science advanced from the Antiquity until nowadays, and that today’s science is ‘higher’ than that of the great civilizations of Ancient Orient. However, nowadays you definitely cannot build a pyramid like that of Khufu in Kemet (Egypt), and all the scientists of the world are good enough only to bring about the total extinction of the Mankind (which is not a nuclear war but the diffusion of Metaverse, a form of Non-being). So, stop considering the modern science and the ensued materialist-consumerist world as anything worthwhile! It would be better to live in Somalia before 600 years or before 3600 years than to live now.
As a matter of fact, without understanding it, all the average people worldwide have fallen victim to deliberately produced delusions like Darwinism and Evolutionism; even those, who say that they reject the false conclusions of these theoretical systems at the paleontological / anthropological level, are indeed their victims, and quite unfortunately, their thoughts are contaminated (by evolutionist concepts, notions, standards, considerations or world perceptions) without them realizing it. Because of this situation, people all over the world stupidly believe that the Mankind is now more knowledgeable and more powerful, whereas the Mankind was far better before 4000 and 5000 years.
What is the fake science geopolitics?
A vicious and insidious trickery as per which you theorize, presenting things as it pleases you.
Geopolitics is a matter of paranoia. You need to be paranoid to possibly accept the idea of the so-called ‘geopolitics’. You can see that on the sick and devious faces of the so-called ‘specialists in geopolitics’.
Every word of the fundamentals of geopolitics is an arbitrary aberration.
There is no such thing as ‘heartland’ or ‘rimland’
– Would you or any other Somali call, under any circumstances whatsoever, the coastland of Somalia from Raas Caseyr and Ras Xaafuun down to Kismaayo, and for 50 km inland, …… ‘rimland’?
– No, you would not! This would be only an imaginary line, which would not represent any historical, cultural, intellectual or academic truth.
But if you had drawn that hypothetical line from Raas Caseyr and Ras Xaafuun down to Kismaayo for your own benefit and for the disastrous consequences, which that line would have on the local inhabitants, you would have then officialized it by calling it ‘geopolitics’.
This is the whole value of the so-called ‘geopolitics’. A trashy concept that suits the criminal interests of the villainous Anglo-Saxon gangsters! The Hell with them!
Do not waste any moment of your life on this mental excrement of ‘geo-politics’!
Such nonsense only corrupts the mind with useless nonsense:
History does not confirm the slightest portion of those silly ‘lines’ that the Anglo-Saxon syphilis drew only to confuse others and plunge billions into endless wars.
Actually, this is what most of today’s average people never observed:
Not one criminal gangster, who postures as a ‘specialist in geopolitics’, has ever bothered to explain the historicity of the «lines» that you and others «see» on their fake maps.
How does all this function?
Backed by big money and taught in supposedly important universities, the fallacy of geopolitics generates idiotic pseudo-academic elites who, after studying in the fake universities, i.e. the academic brothels of England, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the US, are hired due to their nonexistent credentials (in reality their credentials damage their respective countries) only to promote the choleric Anglo-Saxon world’s paranoia, evilness and inhumanity.
Brzezinski’s Eurasian Balkans: there are no ‘Eurasian Balkans’. It’s a fallacy. Wherever you draw an arbitrary ellipse across Asia (or Africa or Europe), you will discover … ‘Balkans’. It’s idiotic, but backed by big money, it is presented as a serious academic analysis. This is a tragi-comical deception, because wherever you want, you can draw historically meaningless lines that you will later call ‘heartland’ and ‘rimland’. Fake words for historically nonexistent concepts. Pure absurdity to fool the idiots.This is a deliberately constructed reality, because Western bankers educated, prepared and launched the so-called ‘red adversary’. There is no such thing as ‘Midland Ocean’; that’s ridiculous.Absurdly drawn lines that are rejected by all the conclusions of the History of the MankindThere is no such thing as ‘The World Island’; it is a non concept. You cannot define the Earth with respect to the Sea. The sea is NOT a place where people lived or can live. It is a space that you only cross to reach other parts of the Earth. The map is entirely fake because not one civilization grew and no humans lived with this map in mind. So, it is an aberration – the vicious fabrication of a paranoid uneducated guy or a heinous schemer.Another fake map established by a paranoid pseudo-scientist: anyone can call ‘middle space’ (and ‘West’, ‘South’ and ‘East’) any part of the Earth that he chooses to designate so. Not a single civilization worldwide ever viewed or named these lands in this ludicrous manner.An absolute absurdity fabricated to confuse othersA total distortion of the World History: there has never been a ‘sea power’. That’s a lie. Every major kingdom or empire was a continental power. The only powerful kingdom that was headquartered in an island is England. But no island has ever existed on its own; every island is a continental dependency. The English theoreticians’ evil effort to produce a fallacy in this regard is tantamount to conscious and systematic desire to abnegate the World History and therefore to annihilate the Mankind.
There is nothing to help «correct» the «mistakes» of geopolitics. Throw the entire fallacy of ‘geopolitics’ to the rubbish basket!
There cannot actually be «mistakes» in a peremptory fallacy: it has been all rotten from Day 1.
This is the mistake of the Russians, who subsidize big institutes and think tanks like VALDAI (https://ru.valdaiclub.com/ and https://valdaiclub.com/) to prove the Americans and the others wrong in the terms of geopolitics. There is nothing to prove in geopolitics; it is all false from the first word.
Only now the Russians start realizing that the mistake was theirs! And they also understand that they accepted already too much of the Western fallacy.
So, do not waste your time with the worthless publications of every Romanian pseudo-scholar! He simply tried desperately to reproduce the same geopolitical fallacy, this time slightly turning the story in a way to suit the interests of Romania. Worthless rubbish! You cannot possibly waste your time on such bogus-publications!
All the countries, which were detached from the Ottoman Empire, are fake states; they merely constitute fabricated tools of the French and English colonialism and inhumanity. Few states make an exception in this regard, as they represent true, real nations. Nowhere else can one study this so well, except in Egypt! This is an entirely fake nation of ignorant and blind people who do not know anything about their own identity, history, past and culture.
When an Iranian speaks about the Achaemenid Emperor Darius I the Great (550-486 BCE; he reigned after 522 BCE), the Iranian feels that he is the descendant of that great emperor and he is fully aware of the numerous elements of his popular (not elite) culture that refer to Darius the Great. This does not happen in today’s Egypt; they speak of Akhenaten or Amenhotep III or Thutmose III as if these pharaohs reigned in another continent and among other people!
Before two years, a US-based Oromo friend wrote to ask me why Egypt does not help the Oromos achieve national independence in return for the ensuing dissolution of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia) and the subsequent cancellation of the Renaissance Dam. I answered saying that, for this to be done, Egypt must first understand that this proposal is suitable for the national interests of Egypt, but this is impossible because Egypt is not a nation first, and second (and worse), the country was entirely constructed by the French and the English in a way that it would not become and it would never function as a state.
I ended saying that, in a way, the Oromos are a nation, although subjugated and persecuted, but the Egyptians never got a proper national education, never realized what national identity is, and never understood how they have been aptly utilized (against their own national interests) by the colonial governments of the Western countries and the evil secret societies behind them.
Here you have my series of five articles as response to his naïve question:
Fake borders of a fake nation ignorant of their past: Modern ‘Egypt’. On this land, there was ‘Kemet’ during the Antiquity and there was ‘Masr’ after the arrival of Islam. The fact that the modern state’s name is in Arabic ‘Gomhuriyah Masr al Arabiyah’, but the Masriyyin (fake Egyptians) do not have the courage to internationally renounce to the fake name ‘Egypt’ and impose their own true name ‘Masr’ worldwide fully demonstrates the colonial nature of their fake state, highlighting the reality that they never became a true nation.
Without understanding the viewpoint of my criticism expressed in the above articles, you cannot understand anything in the world you are living in. You are hypnotized and -like all the other totally deceived Muslims- you live in a fake, parallel world or dimension of your own.
Now, I have to add that, what I noticed and understood from the tenures of both Abdirashid Sharmarke and Siyaad Barre is that, in contrast to the Egyptians, the Somalis -back in the 1960s, 1970s, etc.- felt themselves very well as a real and historical nation. It is not only the very legitimate and glorious effort to liberate Ogaden that makes me believe so, but plenty of other points. This situation is normal however, because Italy was never a «true» colonial country (in striking opposition to France and England) and that is why, during Somalia’s colonization by Italy, the Italians did not try to destroy your inherent national identity – which was very different from what the French and the English carried out in Algeria, Egypt, Sudan, Syria, Iraq, etc.
Now, Romania is a fake nation fabricated out of thin air, only to function against -at the same time- the Ottoman Empire and Russia. There is no Romanian nation; there are Wallachians and Moldavians — two different nations.
There is no Romanian language; it did not exist. It was fabricated by French linguists, grammarians, and colonial Latinists, who intended to falsely portray the Wallachian and the Moldavian languages as the two «dialects» of the hypothetical Romanian language. In fact, they fabricated a linguistic mixture, and their silly local pawns imposed it nationwide as ‘official language’. It is a very filthy story, which also involves the occupation of the Hungarian land of Transylvania and of the Bulgarian province of Dobruja. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dobruja
Knowing the above about the ‘national’ background of the author and ‘specialist’, whom you presented to me, what do you think that he can possibly say — except the lies that he was taught (at home or abroad) to diffuse worldwide?
Remember that, if he ever tried to oppose the official Romanian state dogma and the orchestrated falsehood of the French, the English, the American and other Western universities, all the doors would be closed to him and his career would be destroyed irreparably. He is therefore a bureaucrat, a clerk, who nonchalantly repeats the state dogma’s falsehood and nonsense.
So, if you please, forget it!
II. The Falsification of the History of the Ottoman Empire
If geopolitics is a fake science, plenty of real sciences have also been filled with lies and misperceptions, whereas a great number of topics well known to specialists remained concealed and unknown to the general public — only to the benefit of the criminal colonial agenda.
The History of the Ottoman Empire, the History of Islam, and the History of Modern Turkey are three sectors of the academic discipline of History that have been monstrously falsified by the Orientalist, colonial academics. The reason for this is simple:
– if today’s Turks and Muslims know the truth about these topics, they will not believe the colonial lies, which have been fabricated by the West only to destroy them — and have actually destroyed them. So, without the silly lies that they have in their heads, they would not be destroyed.
The falsification of the History of the Ottoman Empire is a multilayered case of forgery; it involves numerous factors and methods of distortion, namely
1- several historical facts have been concealed from the average public;
2- numerous events have been dissociated from other circumstances, which however constituted their inevitable consequences;
3- various developments were misinterpreted and their significance was over-magnified in order to intentionally cause emotional involvement of the readers;
4- positive forces, pillars of the Ottoman state’s spiritual and physical strength, were deliberately depicted as negative;
5- catastrophic institutions were portrayed as ‘normal’;
6- disastrous oversight, lack of foresight, and other dramatic failures of the sultans, which brought about the gradual decomposition and the final end of the Ottomans, were systematically disregarded or even purposefully hidden from readers;
7- false interpretations and wrong assumptions made by scholars were extensively propagated in order to cause further confusion among the naïve readership; and
8- a ‘mythical’ Ottoman Empire was fabricated to be ‘useful’ for all colonial purposes.
In the process, two very different entities were calamitously confused in order plunge average readers and people in Turkey and worldwide in mysteries: Ottoman dynasty (Ottoman Empire) and Ottoman Civilization. The two entities are entirely unrelated to one another.
Quite indicatively, for the time the Ottoman Civilization existed (until 1580), the real factors of civilization were overwhelmingly opposed to the corrupt, paranoid, inhuman, genuinely anti-Islamic, and absolutely idiotic Ottoman family.
The Ottoman Sultanate became an Empire when Mehmet II invaded the tiny remnant of the Eastern Roman (falsely called by Western colonials as ‘Byzantine’) Empire, namely the city of Constantinople, in 1453; it was then that Mehmet II got the title of Qaysar-i Rum (i.e. Roman Emperor; literally ‘Caesar of Rome’). After the inception of the Ottoman Sultanate in 1299 and until the end of the 16th c., Islamic Civilization flourished in the Ottoman Empire, as it also did in the Safavid Empire of Iran, in the Mughal Empire of India, in Central Asia, in many parts of Africa, and in Indonesia. As you can easily understand, in real historical terms, there is no ‘Ottoman Civilization’; this is ‘Islamic Civilization’.
The Ottomans as a minor Turkmen beylik in the early 14th c.Anatolia around 1350
The real factors of the Islamic Civilization were all the scientists, the mystics, the spiritual leaders of various esoteric orders, the poets, the historians, the authors, the wise scholars, the artists, the architects, the astrologists (who were at the same time real astronomers – because there was no distinction between Astronomy and Astrology at the time, and this was very correct), the alchemists, the masters of the supernatural force, the physicians, the grammarians, the explorers, the inventors, the natural scientists, and all the masters of spiritual and material knowledge and Wisdom.
These people performed and delivered working in several research centers, libraries, academies, archives, and in observatories like those of Maragheh in Iran (13th and 14th c.) and Samarqand in Uzbekistan (15th c.). We find the same driving forces of spiritual and academic life later (16th c.) in the Observatory of Ottoman Constantinople, which was however short-lived since the barbarian mob that followed the Satanic theologians and the ignorant sheikhulislam destroyed it in 1580, because according to their silly opinion “Islam does not permit Astrology”. It goes without saying that every spiritual school (tariqa) was a major scientific center too.
The situation eliminated the ominous impact that a marginal theological group had on parts of the Islamic world; however, this viciously anti-Islamic group made its way to the Ottoman capital (first at Söğüt, near Bilecik, at 200 km from the Eastern Roman capital: 1299-1331; second at Nicaea/Iznik, at 140 km from Constantinople: 1331-1335; third at Prousa/Bursa, at 150 km from the Christian Orthodox capital: 1335-1363; then at Adrianople/Edirne, in Thrace: 1363–1453) long before Mehmet II invaded Constantinople.
The Ottoman Sultanate before the conquest of Constantinople was already kind of a substitute for the Eastern Roman Empire.
To effectively hold the Ottoman sultans hostage of their evil pseudo-Islamic theology, they convinced the sultans to establish an absolutely non-Islamic state position, which had never existed before in any Islamic Caliphate and was actually nonexistent at that time in the Mamluk Caliphate (transferred in Cairo): the position of sheikhulislam. This repugnant and disreputable chicanery turned the Ottoman Sultanate into a viciously sectarian state, therefore promoting the ultimate Christianization of Islam. Any Muslim society that has a top religious authority becomes utterly papal in nature; Islam is by definition a religion with no priests.
As an exaggerated, exorbitant description, the term ‘sheikhulislam’ was never of true, essential value in the Golden Age of Islamic Civilization. On some occasions, it had merely a nominal value, whereas in other cases it constituted an honorific distinction void of any substantive importance. Among Ottomans, it started being used during the 13th c., only to become official at the time of the controversial sultan Murad II (1404-1451; reigned from 1421 to 1444 and from 1446-1451). The reasons for which such an unprecedented measure was taken hinge indeed on the sectarian situation that prevailed among the so-called Ottoman family, which was looking like a brothel whereby every prostitute would fight to make of her son the ‘king’.
If kingdoms are known as the realm of discipline and order, the Ottoman sultanate was the ever moving circumference of nefarious disorder and chaotic wickedness.
Incredibly nauseating stories of divided harems, concubines allying with filthy sheikhs against other concubines supported by other imams, qadis and muftis – with several foreign powers involved in the internal conflicts of the disreputable Ottoman ‘family’ (because this absurd mass of concubines originated from different Orthodox, Catholic, Muslim kingdoms, khanates, principalities, sultanates, emirates and beyliks) and with constant clashes between the sectarian theologians and the only valuable and virtuous body of the state, namely the Janissaries (the indomitable infantry corps) – produced an infernal situation at the top of the world’s most misgoverned country.
The overall socio-economic situation of the population and the ruling conditions of the absurd state that hosted so many centrifugal forces deteriorated significantly due to the rising influence of the odious, sectarian and deeply anti-Islamic theologians around the idiotic Ottoman sultans, the likes of Murad I (1326-1389; reigned after 1362), Bayezid I (1360-1402; reigned as Sultan-i Rum, i.e. ruler of the ‘Eastern Romans’ because of his Eastern Roman mother, after 1389), Mehmed I (1386-1421; reigned after 1413, when the Ottoman interregnum 1402-1413 ended) and Murad II.
III. The Ridiculous Beatification of the Squalid Ottomans, the Worst Enemies of the Turks
The Ottoman ‘family’ and the religious elite achieved to indisputably become the world’s most loathed ruling class; there was no time the wretched Ottoman family garnered the support of more than 10% of the sultanate’s population. Even worse for the Islamic world: further the Ottoman Empire (after 1453) expanded, more loathed it was. The absurdity of these undeniable facts is meticulously hidden by Western and Turkish Turkologists alike; this is due to external interference and colonial involvement in Turkey after the death of Kemal Atatürk.
First, the French ‘school’ of the Annalistes (academics publishing in the ideologically motivated periodical ‘Annales’ in order to portray all historical developments as of socio-economic and not spiritual of nature) and Fernand Braudel (1902-1985) showed an extraordinary interest for the Ottoman Empire’s commercial relations with Venice, Genoa, France and other European kingdoms, thus shifting the focus from other more crucial issues which help average readership identify the disastrous nature of the Ottoman rule.
Fernand Braudel
Second, Anglo-American Orientalists, notably the Zionist Bernard Lewis (1916-2018), the real father of today’s anti-Islamic ‘Political Islam’, decided not to criticize anything related to the History of the Islamic Caliphates (the Ottoman state included) in the way the Western historians used to do as regards the History of the Western European Christian kingdoms after the fall of the Roman Empire. This premeditated anti-academic choice left the then newly created Islamist perspective unchallenged.
Even worse, in Turkey, following Mehmet Fuat Köprülü (1890-1966), a scholar known for his academic tergiversations, weak personality, political confusion, and total inability to contextualize facts, events and developments, several Turkish historians, rather acting as agents of colonial powers, undertook the ridiculous task to ‘familiarize’ the Turks with the Ottomans. Among them, I clearly distinguish Halil İnalcık (1916-2016) and İlber Ortaylı (born in 1947). Their biased publications consist in an academic preparation for an anti-Atatürk political cholera.
Mehmet Fuat Köprülü (right) with Modern Turkey’s most disreputable rascal Adnan Menderes who was rightfully executed in 1960.
When it comes to Turkish Turkologists and Islamologists, it is true that Kemal Atatürk was not as lucky as he was with Turkish Hittitologists, Assyriologists and Sumerologists. Until 1938, there was not one single Turkish historian specializing in Turkology who would truly express with academic arguments the position of the founder of the Turkish state about this topic. This produced a posterior confusion, because many tried to depict Atatürk as Pan-Turkist or Pan-Turanianist, but he was not.
Muazzez İlmiye Çığ, a leading Turkish Sumerologist and Assyriologist
On the contrary and due to Kemal Atatürk’s personal interest in History and Archaeology of Anatolia and Mesopotamia, there were many important Orientalists, historians and archaeologists of Turkish origin as early as 1930-1935, and in many fields of the Humanities, Turkey closed the gap that had been created by the apathy, the indifference and the inaptitude of the 18th, 19th and early 20th c. Ottoman authorities. Highly knowledgeable scholars, like the Assyriologist-Sumerologist Prof. Muazzez İlmiye Çığ, the grand Turkish lady and leading intellectual (born in 1914; 108 years old as of today) and the Hittitologist and archaeologist Ekrem Akurgal (1911-2002), were the sheer result of Kemal Atatürk’s willingness to make of Anatolia the focal point of the new nation, leaving the old capital to its past. About:
Unfortunately, after his death (1938), the founder of the Turkish Nation was betrayed by Kemalists, Pan-Turanianists and Islamists alike. I expanded on the topic at the governmental and ideological levels in my article on Kemal Atatürk:
At the academic, intellectual, educational, and cultural levels, the traitors of Kemal Atatürk attempted to fabricate, under Western colonial academic guidance, a fake story of supposed ‘Ottoman-Turkish’ continuity. This is utterly false; the Ottomans, i.e. the Ottoman family, were the worst enemy of the Turks. Kemal Atatürk liberated Anatolia from both enemies, external and internal: the armies of the French, the Italians and the Greeks constituted the first menace, whereas the wretched and obsolete, anti-Turkish family of Osman was the second opponent. When it comes to the liberation of Anatolia, the pinnacle of the historical process took place on the 3rd March 1924, with the abolition of the Caliphate, which was merely a tool available in the hands of the cursed family to be used against all the Turks throughout the Ottoman lands.
Halil İnalcık: a Turkish origin cosmopolitan who worked in Turkey as historian of the Ottoman Empire only to diffuse misconceptions, misperceptions, and historical falsifications adjusted to criminal Anglo-American colonial plans providing for Turkey’s fake re-islamization and final destruction. His professor in London was the criminal colonial liar and political schemer Bernard Lewis.Execrable clown İlber Ortaylı – he resigned from his academic position in Turkey in 1982 to react against the very correct involvement of the Turkish army in the chaotic political life of the country.
You may have heard about the incessant Ottoman – Iranian wars that ruined both empires, caused hundreds of thousands of casualties, and ruined vast territories of today’s Turkey, Syria, Iraq, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan and Iran for more than three centuries. No less than 11 wars, which lasted in total 88 years, in only a period of 300 years! You must surely be as stupid as an Ottoman original to do it! Incredible!
Quite often, there was foreign incitation, as the Ottomans sided with the French and the Iranians with the English, but all this demonstrates the shameful disgrace that the Ottoman family proved to be for all Muslims across the centuries. These wars were fratricidal indeed, not in the sense that both empires were at least nominally Islamic, but because the two ruling dynasties were Turkic-Turanian. The Safavid dynasty (1501-1736) of Iran was an entirely Turkmen family from Azerbaijan.
In both empires, as well as in the Mughal Empire of India, the official language was Turkic; in all three empires, Farsi was the language of the education, literature, and culture, whereas Arabic was the language of the science. In this regard, all three realms continued an almost millennium long tradition attested in the Abbasid, Samanid, Ghaznavid, Buyid, Seljuk, Ilkhanid and Timurid times.
All the same, under Safavid, Afshar (1736-1796) or Qajar (1789-1925) rule (all three dynasties were Turkmen), the Iranian shahs intervened many times to save the Turkmen populations of Anatolia from the wrath and the cruelty of their Ottoman rulers; it would perhaps be better for the Muslim, Christian and other populations of Anatolia that the Akkoyunlu dynasty (1378-1503), which controlled the lands of Eastern Turkey and most of today’s Iran’s territory, prevailed and lasted to possibly supplant the Ottomans in Western Anatolia and the Balkans. Quite unfortunately, with the Safavid tariqa (spiritual Order) launching their own empire, the Akkoyunlu state perished and the Safavid dynasty rose in power in Iran.
Afshar Iran under Nader Shah invaded the Mughal Empire of IndiaThe Qajar Empire of Iran
IV. Examples of Turkmen, Anatolian and Muslim Rejection of the Ottoman Pseudo-Sunni Theology
Quite indicative is the case of the Shahqulu (Şahkulu/ شاه قولی) movement in Anatolia (1509-1511), which was terribly oppressed by Selim I; at the time, several dozens of thousands of populations were massacred throughout Anatolia, and at the end, no less than 20000 people were sent to exile in South Balkans (Mora / Peloponnesus). In brief, the Ottoman family performed a real anti-Muslim genocide in Anatolia. About:
The Aq Qoyunlu Turkmen state in 1478; all the peoples between the Balkans and the Indus River Valley would live better and more happily with no wars, no oppression and no misery, if the Safavid rise did not put an end to the Aq Qoyunlu Turkmen confederacy and if the Aq Qoyunlu prevailed over the ill-fated Ottomans in Western Anatolia.
Closely related to this fact, the rise of the Turkmen Ağıtlar poetry (ağıt: lamentation) definitely bears witness to the overwhelming rejection and the strong revilement of the Ottoman Constantinopolitan pseudo-Sunni theology, absurdity and wickedness by the quasi-totality of the Anatolian Turkmen population.
The spread of the Şahkulu (Shahqulu) rebellion in 1509-1511
The rejection of the Ottoman family was very well known to the disreputable Dîvan-ı Hümayun (the Constantinopolitan imperial council); it is from there that the most vicious and the most racist, anti-Turk literature emanated. The filthy clerk of the council Hafız Hamdi Çelebi, serving there in the period of Bayezid II (1447-1512; reigned after 1481), wrote the following libel against the main population of Anatolia and the God-damned Ottoman Empire:
– Prof. Dr. Faruk Sümer, Oğuzlar, Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları Vakfı, Istanbul, 1992, p. 348
– Ahmet Refik, Anadolu’da Türk Aşiretleri, Enderun Kitabevi, Istanbul, 1989, p. 77-78
– Baki Yaşa Altınok, Rakka ve Orta Anadolu Ekseninde Bir Oymağın Tarihi (Ceritler) { History of a Tribe on the Axis of Raqqa and Central Anatolia (Ceritler)}, Gazi Üniversitesi Türk Kültürü ve Hacı Bektaş Veli Araştırma Dergisi, Yıl 8, Sayı 21, 2002, p. 211-224
– Baki Yaşa Altınok, Öyküleriyle Kırşehir Türküleri, Destanları, Ağıtları (Kırşehir Folk Songs, Epics, Laments with Their Stories), Oba Yayıncılık, May 2003, Ankara, p. 91-93
Speaking about the spiritual, cultural, educational, intellectual, moral and socio-behavioral traditions of the Anatolian Turks, one has to concentrate on the four cornerstones of the Turkic (mainly Turkmen) Anatolian identity and integrity:
1- the Turkic military epics (notably the legend of Köroğlu),
A statue for the legendary hero of the Turanian world
2- the Iranian epic tradition (an amalgamation of Iranian and Turanian world concepts as narrated by Ferdowsi, Nizami Ganjavi, Amir Khusrau and many others in their epics),
Fereydoun receives Toorshead: miniature from Ferdowsi’s Shahnameh manuscript prepared for the Iranian Shah Tahmasp in the 16th c. The world’s most exquisite manuscript ever is one of the many manuscripts of Ferdowsi’s Shahnameh preserved down to our days and it is known as ‘Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasp’ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shahnameh_of_Shah_Tahmasp). It would however be very erroneous to consider Ferdowsi’s epic as part of the Iranian national culture only. It consisted in an inextricable part of the Turanian national culture too from Siberia to the Balkans and from Eastern Europe to India. It is noteworthy that the Ottoman Emperor Selim I, writing letters to Ismail Safavi, Shah of Iran, prior to the Battle of Chaldiran, compared himself to the great hero Fereydun. All Ottomans constantly read Ferdowsi’s Shahnameh which reflected the popular legends, traditions and cultures of all people throughout the Ottoman Empire.
3- the Turkic mysticism and spirituality (as embodied by several esoteric Orders, starting from Ahmed Yasavi and the Yasawiyya or Yeseviye and going down to the Mevlevi, the Bektashi and the Safavi Orders), and
Symbols and traditions of the Bektashi Order; the Bektashis and their military branch the Qizilbash had the only correct perception, understanding, and interpretation of the Quranic text and the Hadith. Their enemies were the Constantinopolitan Ottoman theologians, who represented a profane distortion of Islam and a systematic effort of Christianization of the teachings of prophet Muhammad. That is why the evil Jesuits loved the Ottoman sultans’ stupidity (that would bring the collapse of the Ottoman Empire sooner or later); for this reason they also love the disreputable political ideology of ‘political islam’, a most anti-Islamic, colonial theory.
4- the sacred texts of Islam (Quran, Hadith) and the traditional Islamic historiography, science, literature, wisdom, and legendary traditions.
Of these foundations, the Ottoman family despised the first, loathed the third (the Bektashi Order was prohibited in 1826, but was well versed in the second (Iranian epics), and excessively utilized the fourth (Quran, Hadith) for their own illegitimate and profane profit.
The Turkic epic tradition, which forms the basis of Modern Turkish literature, refers constantly to the endless Turkic Anatolian rebellions against the Ottoman rulers and their fake Muslim sheikhs and Constantinopolitan sheikhulislams. It is not actually by coincidence that Nazim Hikmet, Modern Turkey’s national poet, wrote his illustrious Simavne Kadısı Oğlu Şeyh Bedreddin Destanı (The Epic of Sheikh Bedreddin, Son of Simavne Kadi), in 1936, about this superb personality of the 14th and the early 15th c.
Nazim Hikmet
The illustrious Sheikh Bedreddin (شیخ بدرالدین; 1359-1420) was a Seljuk mystic and scholar, who in the early 15th c. sided with the great Turanian Emperor Timur (Tamerlane) against the filthy rascal Bayezid I in the Battle of Ankara (1402). At the time, all Anatolian Turks sided with Timur against the Ottoman pseudo-Muslim sultan, because they already realized very well that the silly Ottomans and their treacherous, fake Sunni sheikhulislams and sheikhs would make of their state a tool for the Anti-Christian pope of Rome, ultimately enslaving all the Muslim and the Christian Orthodox populations to the Western European kingdoms.
Map of the Empire of Tamerlane (Timur): it is relatively wrong because it does not include the conquered lands into the state of the Great Emperor, but colors these lands differently.A quite mistaken map of Tamerlane’s EmpireTotally fake map in which most of Tamerlane’s conquests (Moscow, Delhi, Damascus, Ankara, Izmir) are not included in his Empire.
The absolutely perfidious nature of the Ottoman family is fully demonstrated in the case of Timur’s siege (December 1402) and conquest of Izmir (Smyrna, by far the largest and most important city in Anatolia’s western coastland). The Knights Hospitaller and Venetian army had invaded the Eastern Roman city of Smyrna in 1344, fighting against the Seljuk Turkmen Emir of Aydin. For more than 50 years, the cursed dynasty of Ottomans was waging sectarian wars against other Turkmen Anatolian Muslims, but did not bother to attack and eliminate the Western armies from Izmir/Smyrna.
This constitutes an indication of the good relations that some fake Muslim sheikulislams in the Ottoman court maintained with the Catholic forces and the papal delegates. But Timur fully realized what was at stake. That is why, after vanquishing the useless Ottoman sultan Bayezid I, Timur proceeded to Izmir and liberated the Western coastland of Anatolia from the Western European armies.
In fact, viewed historically, Kemal Ataturk and Timur (Tamerlane) seem have achieved -in the same exactly location- parallel military triumphs, against both the cursed Ottomans and the evil Western intruders.
It is for this reason that, after Timur’s death, sheikh Bedreddin led an anti-Ottoman revolution in 1416; the great effort of liberation from the Ottoman yoke started at the same time in Western Anatolia {in Izmir (Smyrna) and Manisa (Magnesia)} and in the Balkans (Dobruja and Wallachia in today’s Bulgaria and Romania). It constituted one very vibrant rejection of the Constantinopolitan Ottoman theological cholera. Evidently, sheikh Bedreddin’s anti-Ottoman rebellion in the early 15th c. was tantamount to declaration of Turkish national identity. About:
Fake map of the Ottoman Empire, with vast part of the empire left out (notably the Arabian Peninsula, the Red Sea coasts, Sudan, Sahara and the African Atlas)Fake map of the Ottoman Empire, probably paid by Saudi petrodollars in order to deliberately present the Arabian Peninsula as located out of the Ottoman Caliph’s control. In reality, the Ottomans treated the desert tribes of the Arabian Peninsula as dogs, and they were very correct in this practice and approach. Correct map of the Ottoman Empire and its dependencies
Many Western scholars deliberately interpret the wars between the Ottomans and the Safavids (16th–18th c.) as a ‘Sunni-Shia’ clash, but this is a lie; this is tantamount to an attempt of viewing History with today’s eyes. It is very wrong. In reality, the Ottoman – Iranian wars were due first, to the well-known and repeatedly attested Turkmen rejection of the devious Ottomans and second, to the clash between the Anatolian Islamic spirituality and the sectarian Ottoman theology. The Iranian Turkmen wanted to support their brethren and save the Anatolian Turkmen from the cruel Ottoman sultans and their devilish sheikhulislams. As you can understand due to my previous paragraphs, it was not only a matter of the early 16th c.; it had already occurred one century earlier: with Timur (Tamerlane)!
One of the consequences of the aforementioned unbearable situation was that great populations (notably the nomads) had to be constantly on the move; more than 200 Turkmen tribes are known to have relocated from the Taurus Mountains to the Zagros mountain range or to the Caucasus region and vice versa (back and forth) during the 15th – 18th c. Coming back to Anatolia after some generations with a richer Georgian or Farsi vocabulary, eventually different names, and also slightly modified beliefs and traditions (as per each case), these originally Turkmen tribes became the ancestors of populations that are nowadays mistakenly thought to be ethnically different (‘Zaza’, ‘Kurmanji’: known as ‘Kurds’).
Areas where Zazaki is spoken in Turkey; Zazaki is closer to Georgian and other Caucasian languages.Kurmanji and Sorani are very different from one another; only perverse linguists can call Sorani ‘South Kurmanji’. This ridiculous classification is tantamount to calling Spanish …. ‘South French’. Both languages are closer to Farsi than to Zazaki. All the same, they have also sizeable Turkish and Arabic vocabulary.
Then, due to the Ottoman lawlessness and out of thin air Anglo-American and French scholars (or German and Russian erudite explorers under Western European influence or guidance) created the ‘myth’ of the so-called ‘Kurdish’ nation.
From the above you can understand that Turkey is by definition an anti-Ottoman Turkish state, which respects the Anatolian culture and heritage of Turkic and non-Turkic populations; it was created thanks to the War of Independence (1919-1923), and by definition, Turks have left the Ottoman past to die. Nothing and nobody will bring it back. Any stupid guy, who may wish to try to revive the Ottoman filth, will merely fall inside the Ottoman tomb, fully deserving its putrefaction.
Demolishing the modern (colonial – Western) myth of the Ottoman Empire would take a 50-volume encyclopedia to effectuate, but I herewith wanted to only pinpoint few critical elements.
Examined with respect to governance, administration, and military force, the Ottoman Empire had the most defective structure of Islamic state. Shortsighted and disingenuous, its rulers (sultans, caliphs or emperors) lost incredible opportunities and doomed their chances to worldwide supremacy. Among the major Muslim empires {disgracefully called ‘gunpowder empires’ by the Western colonial forgers (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunpowder_empires)}, the Ottoman Empire occupied the most useless lands (the deserts of Africa and the sand dunes of the Arabian Peninsula), delivered the most undeserving wars, wasted its mediocre resources (particularly if compared with the Mughal Empire of India), and attacked the wrong enemies.
Last year, I needed more than 4500 words to explain (in an article – see link below!) why it was absolutely pathetic for Mehmed II to conquer the city of Constantinople, i.e. the tiny remnant of the erstwhile formidable Eastern Roman Empire.
I will need more space to expand on how Selim I (1470-1520; reigned after 1512) weakened the Ottoman Empire with his sectarian religious beliefs and his depravity as attested in the already mentioned civil war that followed the Shahqulu rebellion. It will take even more space to analyze the disastrous side-effects of his absolutely unnecessary war against Iran. I must however add that, in this regard, the most astounding absurdity of Selim I was the inane use that he made of his victory at Chaldiran (1514).
Selim ISelim I’s major rival, Ismail Safavi, as painted by the Florentine painter Cristofano dell’Altissimo (the guy who painted Saladin as a devil!)The Battle of Chaldiran as painted in the imperial palace Chehel Sotun in IsfahanThe location of Chaldiran, close to today’s Turkish-Iranian border, NE of the Lake Van
By uselessly invading Syria, Mesopotamia, Arabia and Egypt (1516-1517), he lost the chance to conquer the Iranian plateau down to the Indus Valley and further on to Delhi and the Ganges Valley, thus effectively reconstituting Tamerlane’s formidable state from the Aegean Sea to Bengal. This would be the only way to establish a formidable Muslim state very wealthy and powerful enough to efficiently oppose all European colonial powers and plans.
The terrible mistake of Selim I: instead of merging lands with dense populations from the Adriatic Sea to the Ganges River Valley (by fully invading Iran and subsequently attacking the then ailing Delhi Sultanate), he preferred to collect the sands of Arabia and Egypt as his … treasure.
Last, speaking about Selim I’s son Suleiman I (1494-1566; reigned after 1520), one should first notice the extraordinary eulogies and the bright epithets that Western Europeans used when speaking of him (‘Magnificent’; basically because of his involvement with Charles V of the Holy Roman Empire as regards the liberation of the imprisoned Francis I of France). It is however common wisdom that, when your enemies praise you, you have to realize that you committed a calamitous error. Militarily brave but mentally retarded, Suleiman the ‘Magnificent’ is indeed the person who created the Christian Orthodox ‘Russian’ kingdom of Muscovy with his ill-fated expeditions, his useless wars against Iran, his misperception of the situation in Crimea, Kazan and Muscovy, and his inability to put an end to fratricidal wars among Tatars, Mongols, Turanians and Muslims.
Suleiman I was not ‘magnificent’.
– Do you remember that Ibn Battuta had stated that the world’s most opulent city was Saray, the capital of the Golden Horde (one of the vast states that emanated from Genghis Khan’s Empire)? But who destroyed Saray? Was it the deed of a Russian?
– No! It was the idiotic act of a Crimean Tatar!
Suleiman I’s failure to identify the meaning of the second marriage of Ivan III of Muscovy (1440-1505; reigned after 1462) with Zoe (later Sophia) Palaiologina (niece of the last Eastern Roman Emperor Constantine XI Palaiologos), which took place under the auspices of the pope of Rome, meant that he could not even imagine the back thoughts and the menacing intentions of Vasili III of Muscovy (1479-1533; reigned after 1502).
Ivan III of the tiny principality of Moscow(baptized Zoe) Sophia PalaiologinaVasili III of MuscovyFake map of the principality of Moscow in 1505; the Muscovy rulers did not control even 20% of the territory in green color at the time. Presenting the early Muscovy state larger than it truly was serves the colonial purpose of concealing the enormous size of Turanian and Muslim khanates on Eastern European soil. Even more importantly, the majority of the population of the state of the predecessors of Ivan IV was Turanian and Muslim. They have been gradually russified and Christianized.
That is why, when Suleiman I was about to die (1566), a great rival to the Ottoman Empire had already appeared in the North, after Ivan IV (known as The Terrible; 1530-1584; reigned after 1533) invaded the Islamic Khanates of Kazan (1552) and Astrakhan (1556), being ready to expand at the detriment of the Islamic Khanate of Siberia.
Even worse, the rise of a northern Christian Orthodox empire as successor to the Eastern Roman Empire had already become known to leading Christian authorities in the realm of the otherwise unsuspecting, foolish Suleiman I, as Patriarch Joachim of Alexandria sent to Muscovy demands for financial assistance (1558), because the famous Saint Catherine’s Monastery (in the Sinai) had been damaged by Ottoman soldiers! The unraveling of the Islamic Caliphate and the beginning of the demise of the Ottoman dynasty had already started!
Prof. Mikhail Mikhaylovich Gerasimov’s plastic facial reconstruction of Ioann (Ivan) IV (the Terrible): a Turk who even looked like Tamerlane.
However, the calamitous doctrinal blindness of the Ottomans was such that it irreparably condemned them to ultimate collapse and disappearance 364 years later, when the ludicrous clown Vahdettin (also known as Mehmed VI), the last of all Ottomans, was kicked in the ass and left his palace to find shelter {not in a humble village in Anatolia among Turks (as he should have sought) but} in a British warship, then in Malta, and finally in the Italian Riviera where he shamefully died (1926) only to be buried in Damascus (under French mandate) with the money that his daughter collected like a beggar. About:
Скачать PDF-файл (текст, картинки и легенды): / PDF (metin, resimler ve efsaneler) dosyasını indirin: / Download PDF file (text, pictures and legends):
Le célèbre académicien français Jean Baptiste Duroselle a été chargé par la Commission de l’Union européenne (Communautés européennes à l’époque) et Jacques Delors personnellement d’écrire une Histoire européenne de l’Europe. Ce livre justifierait la création de l’Union européenne dans la 2e moitié du 20e s. comme la couronne de tous les efforts antérieurs pour établir un État à travers le continent. Le livre a été écrit en français (L’Europe : histoire de ses peuples, Paris, Perrin, 1990, 708 p.) et il était destiné à devenir (comme il est en effet devenu) le manuel de base d’histoire européenne pour l’enseignement secondaire de tous. États membres de l’UE. Pour cette raison, de nombreuses traductions ont été produites au niveau local, et le livre est ainsi devenu la pierre angulaire de l’identité européenne ; en ce qui concerne les pays qui n’étaient pas membres en 1990 mais le sont devenus plus tard, le livre a été traduit dans la langue officielle (ou les langues officielles) de chaque pays après son adhésion.
Comme on pouvait s’y attendre, l’État grec chauvin, raciste et pseudo-européen a fait exception.
Des Slaves pris pour des Grecs
Produite par les puissances coloniales de la France et de l’Angleterre en tant que pseudo-État et outil des stratagèmes d’Europe occidentale contre l’Empire ottoman, la « Grèce » est devenue pour la première fois dans l’histoire mondiale le nom d’un État, à la suite des traités d’Edirne / Andrinople, en 1829 et le Protocole de Londres en 1830. Dans le passé, ‘grec’ (‘hellène’) était un terme des plus péjoratifs pendant plus de 1100 ans de règne chrétien romain et romain oriental (330-1453), alors que ‘Grèce’ était simplement un terme géographique utilisé pour désigner cette province marginale et autrement inutile.
Cette province fut le dernier réceptacle du cataclysmique afflux slave durant le VIe s. de notre ère. Cette invasion massive a mis un terme irrévocable à l’existence des personnes grécophones dans les Balkans du Sud. L’empereur romain d’Orient Constantin Porphyrogenitus a écrit à ce sujet, mais les pseudo-historiens de l’État grec raciste d’aujourd’hui reçoivent leurs salaires de faux professeurs afin de discréditer cet empereur hautement intellectuel!
Confession du néant grec ancien
Même avant la christianisation de l’Empire romain, le célèbre édit de Caracalla (Constitutio Antoniniana; 212 CE) indiquait clairement qu’il n’y avait pas de «Grecs» sauf en tant que particularité linguistique au sein de l’Empire romain; en acceptant sans condition de devenir citoyens de l’Empire romain, tous les peuples de langue grecque des Balkans (au sud de la Macédoine), d’Anatolie (Asie Mineure) et d’ailleurs ont admis qu’il n’y avait pas d’identité grecque intellectuelle, idéologique, impériale ou politique, socio-comportementale et étatique. Avant les invasions romaines et l’unification ultérieure de toutes les terres autour de la Méditerranée, la « Grèce » était simplement un terme géographique désignant les terres au sud de la Macédoine et de l’Illyrie ; mais il n’y avait pas d’unité ethnique, tribale, linguistique, intellectuelle, spirituelle, religieuse et encore moins gouvernementale. C’est pourquoi ils s’entretuaient comme des mouches ; et leurs historiographes de bas niveau, qui n’ont jamais atteint le niveau d’initiation spirituel et impérial requis pour devenir des scribes impériaux appropriés, impersonnels et objectifs, ont écrit leurs absurdités (comme Thucydide) en décrivant inutilement les guerres civiles – qui ont encore proliféré la haine, la rancœur, les conflits, l’inimitié et des guerres parmi ces misérables populations.
La capitale d’Alexandre était Babylone, pas Pella, pas Athènes !
Seuls deux rois étrangers, Philippe II de Macédoine et son fils et successeur Alexandre, ont envahi et imposé un ordre temporaire à ces éléments chaotiques. Mais Alexandre méprisait tout ce qui était grec, et c’est pourquoi il choisit Babylone comme capitale et la princesse sogdienne Roxanne comme épouse, après s’être substitué à Darius III, devenant ainsi Shah de l’Empire iranien.
Flatterie coloniale et promesses impériales aux vagabonds des Balkans du Sud
Or, la situation était encore pire dans les confins des Balkans du Sud en 1821-1828, car même pas une goutte de sang de la Grèce antique ne pouvait être trouvée dans les veines des populations locales d’origine slave, albanaise, turque, valaque et autre ; ils parlaient de nombreuses langues différentes et le seul moyen de communication entre eux était le turc ottoman. A ces populations malchanceuses, les gangsters coloniaux criminels, après s’être fait passer pour des «Philhellènes» et raconté des absurdités bon marché pour des idiots, ont vendu l’illusion d’un passé soi-disant glorieux dont cette population misérable serait la progéniture hypothétique.
Fausse langue grecque moderne pour soutenir le racisme pseudo-grec
Croyant au pseudo-mythe vicieusement construit de l’hellénisme, ces populations ont été forcées d’apprendre un idiome préfabriqué (par Adamantios Korais qui était basé en France), qui a été imposé dans les écoles de manière dictatoriale et génocidaire. Ainsi elles ont été dupées pendant deux siècles consécutifs.
On leur racontait sans cesse des mensonges paranoïaques sur la soi-disant splendeur des Grecs antiques fictifs qui « avaient civilisé le monde ». Cela a transformé la pseudo-nation exécrablement misérable et ethniquement bâtarde en fanfarons exorbitants et arrogants dont la vie dépend de mépriser sans cesse et hystériquement toutes les autres nations, voisines ou non (notamment les Macédoniens, les Bulgares, les Albanais, les Turcs et les Iraniens) en tant que personnes culturellement ‘inférieures’ – dont les ancêtres ont été (hypothétiquement encore) ‘civilisés’ par les ancêtres des Grecs d’aujourd’hui !!!
La Grèce d’aujourd’hui est bien l’État raciste par excellence.
Puis, Jean Baptiste Duroselle est arrivé!
Avec son superbe livre, Duroselle a quasi-automatiquement ridiculisé tous les clowns des fausses-universités grecques (encore aujourd’hui, il est interdit de créer une université privée dans la Grèce pseudo-démocratique et crypto-totalitaire) où travaillent (ou performent si vous voulez) des historiens ignorants, des archéologues idiots, des politologues insensés, des hellénistes grotesques et des byzantinologues (sic !) absolument charlatanesques – non pas pour mener des recherches vraies et authentiques mais pour soutenir servilement le dogme criminel et raciste de l’hellénisme, qui est la pire forme de nazisme qui ait jamais existé.
La colère de la foule pseudo-grecque chauvine contre Duroselle
Puis, en 1990, en raison de la demande de l’UE pour une traduction grecque du livre de Duroselle, tous les égouts mentaux de la foule grecque inculte, ignorante et décrépite ont inondé les médias de masse en répandant des insultes sans précédent contre Duroselle, l’UE, l’Europe, les universités européennes et… le reste du monde! Les professeurs d’universités et les académiciens grecs – intellectuellement criminels, intellectuellement malodorants et mentalement pathétiques – ont gardé le silence ou se sont rangés du côté de la foule pour devenir plus populaires en tant que soi-disant défenseurs des «droits» de la nation «grecque». Cette situation témoigne d’une réalité bien cachée ; les faux Grecs des deux derniers siècles, qui sont en réalité une population défigurée privée de sa véritable identité orthodoxe romaine orientale (et non «byzantine»), ne se sont jamais sentis comme une nation «européenne». Leur immense complexe psychologique d’infériorité s’exprime donc chaque fois qu’un événement réel souligne qu’ils sont un pseudo-pays de seconde classe, sans éducation, sans intégrité, sans discipline, sans règle, sans morale et sans raison d’existence.
Les frontières sud-est de l’Europe sont celles de l’Albanie, de la Macédoine et de la Bulgarie.
Je considère comme la réalisation la plus remarquable de ma vie et comme l’honneur le plus distinct que j’ai défendu personnellement Jean Baptiste Duroselle, son livre et son approche académique et intellectuelle contre tous ces coquins (la foule, l’élite et l’état nazis de Grèce), qui ont trouvé mon plaidoyer de 2800 mots pour Le livre de Jean Baptiste Duroselle comme une bonne raison de m’insulter aussi et de me forcer à ne plus renter en Grèce.
L’hystérie anti-Duroselle en Grèce et la fin prochaine de la Grèce
Le plaidoyer a été publié dans l’hebdomadaire grec Oikonomikos Tahydromos le 7 février 1991, bien qu’il ait été rédigé et envoyé le 30 août 1990. Cela a généré plus de 30 réponses absurdes, insultantes et ridicules de la part d’universitaires partiaux (qui ont écrit contre moi uniquement pour « justifier » les postes qu’ils occupaient sans être correctement qualifiés – ce qui est le cas très courant dans le pseudo-État sans mérite « la Grèce » ) ou de la part d’ une foule inculte et des gens qui ont pris la défense de la vérité historique par moi comme une insulte personnelle pour eux! Telle est leur dépravation qu’ils ne peuvent pas se rendre compte que la seule chose qu’ils obtiendront finalement de cette manière est l’anéantissement nucléaire total de la Grèce.
megalommatiscomments 