Tag Archives: Duroselle

The Spiritual Potency of Simple People: from J. B. Duroselle to today’s Manichaean Rulers of Europe to a Crushed Greek Antichrist

Few days ago, an Egyptian friend wrote to me and commented on my article ‘Plea for Jean Baptiste Duroselle’s Brilliant Book, Europe: A History of its Peoples’:

https://www.academia.edu/86600089/Plea_for_Jean_Baptiste_Duroselles_Brilliant_Book_Europe_A_History_of_its_Peoples

Table of Contents

I. How Simple People can utterly destroy today’s World

II. Jean Baptiste Duroselle and Yahya Ibn Zakariya

III. Lassalian Monks and Schools  

IV. Western European Elites hide their Manichaean Nature and Evil Faith

V. “Gods” do not accept Multipolar Worlds! 

VI. A Greek World Leader and False Messiah: One of the several Antichrists to come  

VII. The Duroselle Affair in Greece, and I

I. How Simple People can utterly destroy today’s World

His pessimistic viewpoint forced me to write a rather long response, because it is an essential issue of Moral and a supreme moral obligation for anyone not to associate himself with the injustice and the lawlessness of today’s world, and even more so, to do all that it takes to dissociate himself from the surrounding environment, to reject it and to denounce it as inhuman, impermissible and subject to monstrous, terminal annihilation.

It is only due to the prevailing worldwide, overwhelming and compact materialism, evolutionism and relativism that people lost their faith and cannot duly assess the eventually great spiritual power of the wish and of the negative wish. A faithless person that does not truly believe in the spiritual world cannot bring forth results in either wishes or negative wishes; I have to point out that I fully distinguish between negative wish and curse. In the latter case, one person invokes something harmful to someone, whereas in the former case, one demands forcefully that a negative development be averted or cancelled. Although a curse may be at times morally imposed to be uttered, a negative wish is essential to be thunderously expressed every time one person encounters a case of injustice, a wrongdoing, evilness, and any sort of falsehood, deceit, perfidy, scheme, chicanery or lie.

Today’s faithless Muslims, Christians, Confucians, Taoists, Hindus, Buddhists and others have lost real faith in the spiritual, ‘supernatural’, world. They stupidly believe only in diverse stories and unimportant narratives, which -in spite of their possible veracity- do not constitute an inherent part of the true religion; their faith to God is only nominal. The ensuing catastrophic consequences lead to indiscriminate feelings of inefficiency, impotency and, even worse, self-depreciation. Due to this situation, they become effectively irreligious, because they practice their religion only mechanically (imitating ancestors) or hypocritically (to show to the society that they are faithful); but this is utter disbelief. What follows this encumbering situation is spiritual apathy; this involves also emotional indifference, and full purposelessness in life. These people are characterized by moral depravity indeed, not in the sense of being genuinely corrupt, but for not reacting, for keeping silent, and for tolerating the wrongdoing.

A positive wish can do wonders for many; and a negative wish has the power to prevent many evil acts and ominous developments from happening. Virtually any taciturn or vociferous person, who has strong faith, can express formidable negative wishes and bring forth results. This actually happens, but today’s idiotic materialists simply cannot ‘see’ or understand it. A very well focalized negative wish cancels everything; from a simple governmental act to an assassination attempt to a war. And I can conclude that the chaotic situation in which all the powerful and evil lobbies of today’s world find themselves, failing to achieve what they intend, has much to do with highly synchronized negative wishes that resolutely cancel the Satanic plans of all the ‘Christian’, ‘Jewish’, ‘Muslim’, ‘Hindu’, ‘Buddhist’, ‘Taoist’, ‘Confucian’, ‘Shinto’ or other governments, which sooner or later will disappear in utmost ruination.

In fact, all the forthcoming disasters come -also- from the negative wishes expressed in our world by people who -thanks to their moral standards and irrespective of their religion- fully understand that this world is impermissible to exist and has therefore to vanish in monstrous extermination. All negative wishes expressed against today’s lawless world are the path of the few to the Paradise; and every sort of reluctance, every form of indifference, and every aspect of apathy toward today’s criminal governments, Satanic presidents, demonic prime ministers, and other anomalous magistrates open the Gates of the Hell to all the idiots who think that Eternal Life can possibly hinge on meaningless cults hypocritically performed just to ensure later ‘reward’.

Quite unfortunately for the present, diabolical but perishing world’s establishment, God is not as malleable and as stupid as they delusionally imagine He is; and I am not referring to the ‘Demiurge’….

You can herewith find my friend’s comment and my lengthy response.

— A friend’s comment about my Plea for J. B. Duroselle’s Book

Very interesting story about this guy Jean Baptiste! His name reminded me of my college: College St. Jean Baptiste De La Salle in Bab El Louk, then Khoronfich, then in Daher…

This shows how Europeans are like the other crooks, how they plan things in advance, and they pass them on.

What do we have in our hands to change things, except to write and express our views, without any results…

——————– My response ——————  

Dear Awadallah,

Thank you for your response, which so well shows that you understand that the Jean Baptiste Duroselle affair (in Greece 1990-1991), although it looks like an ‘internal’ European story (as an indication of the barbaric, ultra-nationalist and paranoid character of the basically uneducated and absolutely uncultured Greek society), has indeed wider implications. That is true.

II. Jean Baptiste Duroselle and Yahya Ibn Zakariya

All neighboring states must demonstrate a particular concern when, in a wretched country, people react with such hysteria, every time the lies that they stupidly believe in are overwhelmingly rejected by the world’s leading scholars.

Your email offered me the chance of a flash back and of a self-reappraisal; I will tell you what I mean. 

However, let me start with a funny episode of the Greek, absurd and paranoid, reaction (back in 1990-1991) against Duroselle’s book, which is nowadays the cornerstone of all the EU member states’ secondary education — except for the backward trash of Greece where the education manuals are more racist than those in Nazi Germany at the time of Hitler.

In the fever of the anti-Duroselle madness that turned the average Greeks to rabid dogs back in 1989-1991, every famous person felt stupidly obliged to contribute to that mental and intellectual cholera, to promote the local chauvinism, and to speak against Jean Baptiste Duroselle.

The ignorant, uneducated and clownish «poet» Odysseas Elytis wanted to add his childish nonsense to the insults aired against the excellent French academician and his pertinent book. Bear in mind that his fake Nobel Prize was purchased by the Greek government of Constantine Caramanlis with the money of the idiotic average Greek taxpayer! I have to also add that Elytis’ real surname is Alepoudellis, which sounds very low and even derogatory in Greek (as it means «puppy fox» or «fox-relative»), and that is why he changed it (due to his enormous psychological complex of inferiority). By the way, you have to also know, when it comes to the filthy rascal Elytis, that when he found out that his wife had multiple sclerosis, he locked her in a clinic to get rid of her and to enjoy his cursed life with the company of a young prostitute. 

So, this stinky trash of Elytis, in order to «prove» (!!!??!!!) that Jean Baptiste Duroselle was wrong for not including events of the otherwise unimportant Ancient Greek History in his comprehensive book of European History, said the following silly sentence: «Duroselle forgot that even his name is Greek»!

This is an allusion to the academician’s two personal names, namely «Jean Baptiste».

Although it appears that the French names originate from the respective Latin names (Ioannes Baptista), and that subsequently the Latin names derive from Ancient Greek, this is simply false. 

https://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ioannes_Baptista  /  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_the_Baptist 

John Baptist (known to Muslims as Hz. Yahya ibn Zakariya /  يحيى ابن زكريا,) was not a Greek, but an Aramaean-speaking Jew. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_the_Baptist_in_Islam

John Baptist’s real name was Yohannan ha’Matbil ( יוחנן המטביל / and in Syriac Aramaic/Suryani:  ܘܚܢܢ ܡܥܡܕܢܐ)

https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/יוחנן_המטביל  and https://arc.wikipedia.org/wiki/ܝܘܚܢܢ_ܡܥܡܕܢܐ 

{There is already, thank God (!), a Syriac-Aramaic Wikipedia: https://arc.wikipedia.org/wiki/ܦܐܬܐ_ܪܝܫܝܬܐ }

The conclusion is that Duroselle, when baptized as a Christian, got from his parents the two names ‘Yohannan ha’Matbil’ (Hz. Yahya ibn Zakariya) as personal names in their own language (French). His parents wanted apparently to commemorate the forerunner of the Christian faith.

There is no Greek involvement in this, and surely Yohannan ha’Matbil (Hz. Yahya) did not bother to learn Greek or any other foreign language. 

This episode shows clearly that chauvinistic ideas, concepts and thoughts are prevailing in the pseudo-European state of Greece.

III. Lassalian Monks and Schools 

This being one point, I have to add that I also know the Cairo-based institution that you attended when a schoolboy.

It is named after a (relatively recent) saint of the Catholic Church, namely Jean Baptiste de la Salle, who lived at the time of the Roi Soleil (Louis XIV). More: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Baptiste_de_La_Salle

France is inundated with colleges like the one where you you took secondary education courses in Cairo.

The first of all of them was launched by the saint Jean Baptiste de la Salle himself, when he was in life. The instructors and administrators were members of the religious order that he also initiated.

They are known as Lassalian monks (after «de La Salle»). 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_La_Salle_Brothers

IV. Western European Elites hide their Manichaean Nature and Evil Faith

Now about Europe I wrote many articles back in the middle 2000s; I don’t intend to repeat myself. Friends turned the most important of them into a video: 

https://ok.ru/video/333173819992

When the good friend of mine, who expressed his readiness to make of this article a video, asked me what music to add, I said «undoubtedly Uighur instrumental»! The result was excellent. I really love Uighur instrumental music.

Russian friends turned the slides prepared my friend to be used in the video, and they published my article as a presentation (although it is in English): 

https://thepresentation.ru/kulturologiya/50-years-of-european-manichaeism

The article is available here: 

https://www.academia.edu/22874256/50_Years_of_European_Manichaeism

No one understands that today’s real centers of power and secret societies, which shape the Western European process, are all Oriental of origin and they simply try to hide their Oriental past and identity by appearing as descendants of the Greeks and the Romans. That’s why they persistently over-magnified the significance of the Roman civilization, they fabricated the myth about Ancient Greece’s supposedly important ancient civilization, and they threw all this filthy stuff to the eyes of stupid and uneducated people worldwide as a smokescreen.

As a matter of fact, there cannot be one Europe (not because the Germans, the Russians, the Italians, the French, and the Spaniards cannot hypothetically cohabitate in a sizeable Confederacy, but) due to the fact that the powerful secret societies that hide in the coulisses, behind the impotent governments, have different plans and divergent projects for Europe.

What average people do not know is that all these groups of power (the Jesuits, the Freemasons and the Zionists) have opposite plans of eschatological and messianic character. In simple terms, this means that all these groups prepare (or rather have already prepared) their own Messiahs, one for each of them, and they intend to launch them in public. Soon, you will see new, very influential statesmen to appear in clash with one another. They will be slandering one another as the Antichrist.

These centers of power existed for thousands of years; they are not new. And they existed mainly for this reason: in order to launch their Messiah (each of them). So, the clash will be ferocious and it will bring devastating disasters. Countries or people do not matter for them. What matters for each of them is their plan (by saying this, I mean its implementation). They will make entire countries disappear. What you saw in Pakistan is nothing. Bangladesh will disappear in one day. 

V. “Gods” do not accept Multipolar Worlds! 

Putin understood it very correctly and said it openly. What you and I believe about Allah, Islam, the Quran, etc. does not matter to them. These people believe utterly that they are «God». And they behave like that, using their power to destroy the enemy and the enemy’s pawns. One group of them, the Jesuits, has the secret plan of Russia’s Consecration to the Heart of Virgin Mary. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consecration_of_Russia_to_the_Immaculate_Heart_of_the_Blessed_Virgin_Mary

Do you know what this means? This means that the execrable Satanist, i.e. the Anti-Christian pope Francis I, does not consider Russia as a Christian state. He wants to turn it first to a Catholic dependency and then to use it. He tries to mobilize every stupid and idiotic politician anywhere on Earth for this purpose. Stupid and fake Muslim politicians, who have relations with this subordinate of the impending Antichrist (Masih al Dajjal), will lose their countries in a matter of few weeks (when the confrontation will start), because their enemies will manage to take benefit of the developments. 

Now, the people who launched European Union (back in the late 40s and the early 50s), like Jean Monnet and all the others, known as founders of the European Union (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Founding_fathers_of_the_European_Union), were opposite to the Jesuits. But they did not protect their project (European Union) well. Then, after the late 1980s, the Jesuits marked a significant comeback. 

Duroselle was a close associate of Jean Monnet and a French Freemason. But their plans about Europe included also the split and destruction of Russia (then known as USSR). This became very evident with de Gaulle, who did not say the words «Union soviétique» (or U.R.S.S.) even once. He used to call that state «la Russie». So, de Gaulle spoke about a Europe «de Lisbonne aux Ourals», which means a de facto split of Russia. 

Charles de Gaulle and David Ben Gurion

But naive Russians misread this very threatening discourse, by taking it as friendly!!!

Quite unfortunately, guileless Lavrov, like the absolutely idiotic Gorbachev, thinks that de Gaulle meant «one state from the Pacific to the Atlantic».

There could not be worse reading than that. He keeps speaking in a most apologetic manner instead of invading Ukraine in its entirety, and ending the problem once forever. About:

http://www.agenziaradicale.com/index.php/rubriche/rimandi/3978-understanding-russian-political-ideology-and-vision-a-call-for-eurasia-from-lisbon-to-vladivostok

https://valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/french-presidential-election/

Here you can find some correct points: https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/charles-de-gaulle-defended-the-project-of-europe-from-the-atlantic-to-the-pacific-oceans#

https://fresques.ina.fr/de-gaulle/parcours/0004/de-gaulle-et-l-europe.html

The Russian establishment keeps maintaining useless, fraudulent hopes. They only confuse themselves and endanger their country.

Stephan Kessler, Daniel & Cyrus in Bel’s Temple

Every word uttered by English, Americans, French, Canadians and Australians is a ruse and a fraud.

China makes the same disastrous mistake, speaking about a new multipolar world.

There isn’t going to be any new multipolar world.

The evil, crypto-Manichaean forces that control the Western world, when they will understand that, in their fight against one another, they allowed significant part of force to be obtained by others (Russia, China, India, Brazil, but also Turkey and Iran), will launch suddenly and unexpectedly a nuclear war — not at the scale that most people are afraid, but a nano-nuclear war like what you saw in Beirut.

These are paid liars: https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/iaea-mission-detects-no-radiation-increase-in-beirut-after-recent-blast

VI. A Greek World Leader and False Messiah: One of the several Antichrists to come  

Then, there is also a fake Freemasonic lodge that wants to make of Greece a larger state with control over both sides of the Aegean Sea, the Dardanelles, the Sea of Marmara, and the Bosporus – after the Treaty of Sevres. 

They don’t hate Turkey and Islam only; they despise Christianity enormously, and they want to bring back the charlatan – pseudo-gods of the Ancient Greeks. They want also to create a phantasmagoric appearance of UFOs and extraterrestrials, who will ‘land’ on Mount Olympus; of course, as you can guess, these will be fake extraterrestrials.

In reality, they will be demons in humanoid form and they will start having sex in the brothel-temples of Ancient Greece that they will entirely rebuild. Every story that you heard about homosexuality, prostitution, sexual orgies, etc. revolves around this project.

For 1600 years, Theater was -thank God- banned among Christians, but with the establishment of Modern Greece, the French and the English started pushing for the return of the old, evil habits.

https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14559a.htm

(see unit «The End of the Roman Theatre and Amphitheatre» below:)

https://www.thecollector.com/roman-theatre-amphitheatre-in-ancient-rome/

https://www.jstor.org/stable/3205442

By the way, I have to herewith add that Theater was already rejected in Ancient Greece as devilish: 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antitheatricality

To fully prepare for the aforementioned, absurd and evil project, they re-introduced Ancient Theater in Modern Greece only in the 1950s, i.e. 130 years after the country became independent. Due to the shameless pseudo-art of Theater, Modern Greeks lost their religion and they indulge in every abomination, being the shame of their Eastern Roman Christian Orthodox ancestors. 

This villainous Freemasonic lodge wants to make of Greece the center of the world and their Messiah will be ruling from Crete where enormous treasures are going to be discovered (these Freemasons know the details). This is the whole secret behind the French-Greek alliance. You have a lot to wait in this regard.  

מנא מנא תקל ופרסין

VII. The Duroselle Affair in Greece, and I

And for this reason, the duplicitous and evil Western European authorities rapidly covered the scandal «Greece», which exploded around the book of Duroselle.

Few people remember it today, but it is good to bring it to the surface and to show the level of ignorance and the fake education that prevails in that country in which still today private universities are not allowed to open and function.

Do you know why?

– In order not to allow anyone to challenge the tyrannically imposed bogus-historical dogma of Hellenism.

«Hellenism» is worse than Nazism. Unfortunately, «Hellenism» is merely the filthy, disreputable showcase; but in the abominable backstage, you have an exorbitantly disproportionate dose of sexual anomalies among the evil spirits that the ignorant and uneducated Ancient Greeks accepted as possibly ‘gods’! All to the glory of Satan whose Ancient Greek name was Zeus!

Many friends asked me why I defended Duroselle, although my worldview is different and my approach to European History is very divergent from his. 

I responded that their evaluation is correct, but they basically misunderstood me, if they thought -even for a moment- that knowledge is a value for me. Knowledge is never a value. In the past, wisdom was accepted by the spiritually and intellectually superior as the real value. Ultimately, wisdom means accurate evaluation, pertinent judgment, and moral utilization of knowledge. There is no wisdom without Moral, and there is no Moral without Spirituality.

What are then the proper criteria of evaluation and the standards of investigation?

Nothing else except those stated clearly by the Moral.

Without Moral there is no religion, there is no faith, and spirituality ends up in black magic. 

Revisiting these days the Duroselle affair and getting a brief retrospective view on it, I noticed how much it helped me. 

In younger age, I had never thought to live in Greece; since my childhood, my future was «set» in the regions, lands and cities that my grandparents narrated to me.  I then can say that, during the period 1978-1990, a) my postgraduate studies in France, England and Belgium, b) my doctoral studies in Germany, and c) my archaeological explorations in Turkey, Syria, Iraq, Palestine and Iran fully equipped me with detailed knowledge and understanding. 

The barbarian, ignorant, narrow-minded and intolerant stance of the Greek elite, society and state, as expressed in the Duroselle affair, simply showed to me that I had to take distance from, and never return to, Greece.

I then drew the conclusion that a rubbish-collector in Sudan, Yemen, Chad, Somalia or Tanzania is superior to a professor of university, an academician, a prime minister or a president in Greece. Why? Because rubbish collectors are cleaner than all those who are plunged in the Satanic contamination and the falsehood of Hellenism!

Then, it did not matter whether I agreed or not with Duroselle; what mattered was that I disagreed with the disgusting sewerage of Greece. Ever since, my position has been irreversible, intransigent and unconditionally uncompromising.

Best regards,

Shamsaddin

—————————————————-

Download the text in Word doc.:

From Jean Baptiste Duroselle (and his Book) to the Making (and Unmaking) of Europe to (the Rise of) the Final Empire in Russia

От Жана Батиста Дюрозеля (и его книги) к созданию (и разрушению) Европы и к (возвышению) последней империи в России

Several friends from different countries read with great interest and greater amusement my recent article about the Duroselle Affair back in 1990-1991:

Plea for Jean Baptiste Duroselle’s Brilliant Book, Europe: A History of its Peoples

https://www.academia.edu/86600089/Plea_for_Jean_Baptiste_Duroselles_Brilliant_Book_Europe_A_History_of_its_Peoples

Most of them did not know either the late French academician or his book, let alone the ridiculous and ignominious reaction of the average Greeks and of the barbarian Modern Greek elite to the truths revealed in the book of the French academician.

Then, these friends of mine made their own research for some time; subsequently, they came back with plenty of questions as regards my wholehearted support for Jean Baptiste Duroselle and his book. Some of them asked me why I supported so fervently a book that does not reflect my approach and evaluation of the History of Europe. Others asked me at what point this affair stands in my progressive adhesion to Islam, because in reality 25-26 months after the moment I wrote the Plea, I took my final decision to become Muslim.

Their questions offer me therefore the opportunity of a retrospective view on my spiritual path, academic career, intellectual progress, and cultural development; they are therefore quite challenging for me as they force me to stand in front of the mirror of my life. 

I – My view of Europe in the 1980s and now

Since my childhood, I have never been Euro-centric; I went to a French school during the primary and the secondary education, but this was not a reason for me to see France as the sole point of reference. I went to France for postgraduate studies, but this was only one of the countries where I pursued this level of studies. I spent my life’s first 27 years in six European countries, also traveling to many other European states, but I was not Eurocentric at all. Until the end of 1983, my few travels to non-European lands were not the reason of my universalism. Certainly, this tendency must be attributed to aspects of inherent spirituality, to home culture and education, to my personal readings, and above all, to the fact that my parents and grandparents were -all- born in Anatolia, a major Asiatic land of civilization and eschatology.

Due to my strong European linguistic background (seven modern and two ancient European languages), I was well versed in European History; but I never viewed it as an autonomous historical knowledge, markedly delineated and clearly distinct from that about other lands or continents. In other words, I never felt and I never experienced, let alone accepted, the existence of borders; to me all borders are meaningless, useless and even profane. Therefore, I never considered Europe as a possibly standalone entity or land. My strong family connections with Turkey and Russia, my knowledge of these major European and Asiatic languages, and my intensive studies in Orientalist disciplines made me ‘balance’ and ‘temper’ what was absolute for many of the institutions that I frequented: the European culture and civilization.

This was my feeling at the time (and still is today): if you take off from Lisbon and land in Chelyabinsk, you will find an enormous cultural and behavioral difference; then you conclude that somewhere in-between there must be ‘borders’. But in real terms, this is absolutely fictional. How can you understand that? If you travel by land, you will see the many similarities and the few dissimilarities that you will encounter every now and then from Lisbon to Valladolid, to Montauban and thence to Strasbourg, Dresden, Warsaw, Minsk, Moscow, Kazan, Ufa and Chelyabinsk. In reality, cultural continuity prevails over state borders.

My long years in the Middle East (where, while exploring the past, I extensively became acquainted with the local culture and the daily life of numerous nations and ethnic-religious groups) helped me shape my approach, corroborate my conclusions, and consolidate my conviction about the disappointing limits of the conventional modern scholarship (including my Greek, French, English, Belgian and German professors). Still, there was no systematic criticism of the European project of ‘unification’ from my side at the time; it simply did not interest me. Last, I did not express a straightforward rejection of the European colonial powers, of their deeds, and of the ensuing calamitous results back in the middle-late 1980s.

All the same; at the time, I did not approach the topic (History of Europe) in the same manner (as Jean Baptiste Duroselle did) either. To me, his approach was only one out of many possible approaches. I remember very well that at those days I was saying (as I do right now) that the History of Europe begins in Egypt and in Mesopotamia. This means automatically that I already did not accept either borders or continents.

II – Europe begins in Egypt and in Mesopotamia

There cannot be History of Europe without

– the Phoenician colonization of the Aegean Sea, South Balkans, and North Africa,

– the Carthaginian presence in Sicily, Sardinia and the Iberian Peninsula,

– the Scythians, the Cimmerians, the Celts and the Teutons, who are of Asiatic origin,   

– the Egyptian priests of Isis, Horus, Anubis and Sarapis, who propagated their cults,

– the Mithraic pirates who imposed Mithraism in South Balkans and South Italy,

– the Mithraic priests, who revealed Mithras’ mysteries throughout Europe,

– the Aramaean origin Emperor Elagabalus, for whom Syria was holier than Europe, 

– the Edict of Caracalla that turned Syrians, Egyptians & Berbers to Roman citizens,

– the Chaldean Oracles & the Babylonian spiritual heritage that they brought in,

– the Manicheans, whose faith was preached by an Iranian mystic in Mesopotamia,

– the Huns and all the other Turanian or not invaders who settled in Europe,

– the Muslims of Andalusia, who turned their land into Europe’s scientific center,

– the Volga Bulgars who were Islamized before the Kievan Rus were Christianized,

– the Tatars & the Mongols (Golden Horde), who are Russia’s vertebral column, and

– the Ottomans, whose European lands were larger than any other European empire’s except for Napoleon’s momentary state, Russia, and the Roman Empire. 

Still, all this was missing in Jean Baptiste Duroselle’s book.

Certainly, an academic criticism of Duroselle’s book could be founded, but any perspicacious scholar would instantly understand the purpose of that book: it was not a strictly educational material. It was written to become (as it really did) the cornerstone of the European unification. Today many people forget that, when Duroselle was writing his book, the USSR and the Warsaw Pact were still there. As educational material, it was meant to be that of at least one generation.  

Then, why should one write an academic criticism of a book that has an exclusively political purpose and scope (except the scope is nefarious and destructive)?

I never believed that Duroselle’s book was written with bad intentions. As member of the same elite, which sought to establish the European Union on sound and solid bases, Jean Baptiste Duroselle advanced, at the academic/educational level, in the same manner statesmen and legislators did at the political level: step by step. Or if you prefer, one step at a time! The European Coal and Steel Community had only six (6) member states in 1952; but the European Communities had twelve (12) member states when, 37 years later, in 1989, Duroselle was writing his book.

Then, I realized that in the elaboration of the (demanded by the Commission of the European Communities) book, Duroselle proceeded in the same manner. Most probably, if everything went well, another historian 25-30 years later would compose another «Europe: A History of its Peoples» to incorporate material, facts, cultures and nations that I suggested (as per above) and which Duroselle fully omitted. Then, a fully successful European Union would incorporate Turkey and Russia, thus transforming its nature and changing its name (once more) into Eurasiatic Union. This would be a most propitious development – not only for Europe but for the entire world.

As I saw the entire project as an open-ended effort, I did not feel the need to criticize Duroselle’s book at the time, hoping that things would progress beneficially to all, with the elimination of narrow-minded approaches, discriminatory theories, and racist schemes which help raise fictional barriers and fake borders, turning peoples and nations to conflicting parts in a destructive game.

III – Many different plans for a Unified Europe

One should not associate Jean Baptiste Duroselle and his book with today’s calamitous and anti-European leadership of the European Union and of many of its countries. Duroselle belonged to a totally different elite, which simply failed to keep the evil forces out.

It is also erroneous to think that the problem is due to a divide between forces that intend to establish and consolidate a Unified Europe and those who intend to plunge the countries of the European Union into endless strives, fraternal conflicts, and catastrophic wars. I don’t mean that there are not forces acting to damage the European Union; they certainly exist and they deploy every possible effort to harm the European project.

However, the greatest trouble has been the existence of several parallel agendas providing for different versions of the European project. There were plans which equated the European unification, not only with the fall of the Soviet system but also, with the split and destruction of Russia. Duroselle was a close associate of Jean Monnet and a French Freemason. But their plans about Europe included also the split and destruction of Russia (then known as USSR). This became fully evident with Charles de Gaulle, who did not say the words «Union soviétique» (or U.R.S.S.) even once. He used to call it «Russie». So, de Gaulle spoke about a Europe «de Lisbonne aux Ourals», which means a de facto split of Russia. 

I beg you not to misunderstand me! I do not equate Charles de Gaulle with all those who wanted to destroy Russia. His idea reflected the targets and the agenda of only one group. That group wanted (and still wants) to include European Russia into the European project. But there are other groups with other targets and very different agendas, as per which Russia must not be cut to just two parts, but to ten or fifteen pieces.

With the aforementioned, I don’t mean recent but old groups, secret societies, and long enduring, evil plans providing for Russia’s pulverization. To add further perplexity to the already confusing story, I must add that there is no unity of purpose even among those who intend to fully pulverize Russia. There are some who are very cheerful for the European unification project and have malicious intentions toward Russia; and there are others who want to see both, Europe and Russia, plunged in division, turned to endless battlefields, and mercilessly destroyed.

IV – Serious mistakes committed by past European leadership

And the forces that were in charge committed many mistakes. Things did not go out of control with the beginning of the Russian special operation in Ukraine in 2022; the real problems started at the time of Mitterrand (1916-1996), Kohl (1930-2017) and Gorbachev (1931-2022). The earliest form of these problems appeared in the minds of people like Jean Monnet (1888-1979), Pierre Renouvin (1893-1974), and Jean Baptiste Duroselle (1917-1994), who kept in their heads a pre-WW II image of the world. This fact prevented them from fully realizing that their project was in striking contrast with three different agendas:

– the Jesuit agenda providing for European unification and for Russia’s division and subordination,

– the US-Zionist agenda implying US predominance in Europe, and Russia’s final pulverization, and

– the UK-Fake Freemasonic agenda intending to cause conflict everywhere between the Atlantic and the Pacific.

Of course, the existence of an agenda does not mean that it will be materialized, but for this to be done, mistakes must not be made. Unfortunately, the aforementioned three leaders made colossal mistakes. Their intention to advance in small steps only guaranteed that catastrophic errors would be produced in the process; they should have advanced in a very bold and most impulsive manner, which would change everything in the horizon so quickly that others would never be in a position to react. Many times, what does not change in a second, fails to evolve and, due to other changes occurred elsewhere, becomes obsolete.  

Mitterrand, Kohl and Gorbachev should make an agreement as per which the termination of the Soviet/Russian presence in East Germany would imply the immediate termination of French/English/ American presence in West Germany.

UK and US should be kept out of every discussion pertaining to Germany and France. Gorbachev’s agreement with Helmut Kohl dates back to July 1990 (during their meeting on 14th July); but the Warsaw Pact was dissolved one year later (July 1991). East Germany’s exit from the Warsaw Pact should occur at the same moment as West Germany’s exit from NATO. The momentous advent of a neutral, united Germany should be the sole and undisputed target of Mitterrand, Kohl and Gorbachev. With the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact, the leading states of the European Communities, namely France, Italy, Spain and Portugal, should withdraw from NATO to become militarily neutral countries – just like Germany and all the former Warsaw Pact member states.

European Communities should then immediately start discussions with Russia and other Eastern European states for the establishment of a new European organization of security and military cooperation.

All the other European Communities member states that had not withdrawn from NATO should be asked to either follow the example of the major states or cease to be part of the European project.

Specific legislation in the European Parliament should be voted to permanently block academic exchanges with US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand (and with  UK if the insular state did not withdraw from NATO), making it impossible for European students to ever study in US, Canadian, etc. universities. The relations between the European Communities and the US should be limited at the level of simple trade.  

As a matter of fact, the mistakes of Mitterrand, Kohl and Gorbachev were those of their mentors, and the reason for them was the fact that they kept having a pre-WW II world view in a post-WW II world. This was preposterous. They failed to accurately assess the deep seated hatred that post-WW II American elites had of Europe, and which was superbly encapsulated in John Kennedy’s silly words about France (‘a country the size of Texas’ having the pretension of ‘grandeur’ and ‘universal relevance’).

Example of typically American trash that is absolutely impermissible on European soil: https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/france-united-states-iraq/

Post WW II America evolved from a supportive friend of Europe to an encumbering ally only to dare finally assert her claim to world supremacy. It goes without saying that the rise of an empire is achieved either in parity with another or with the collapse of another. In fact, after the end of what is conventionally called WW II, any truthful vision of a United Europe is that of an Empire, and it cannot be achieved within the concept of a Res Publica. Consequently and by definition, the US and the UK are the ‘enemies’ and all the states of Asia and Africa are the potential allies.

V – The rise of a self-destructive establishment in Europe

Failing to understand that America is the enemy and not the ally or partner of Europe was not the only mistake of the last representatives of the old guard of European statesmen and politicians. They failed to identify a series of challenges, to come up with their own responses to them, to spot groups using a perverse language to corrupt European ideals and principles, to outmaneuver them, to eliminate subversive theories like today’s biased and fake multiculturalism, to find various alternatives to the supposed ‘need’ of cheap labor force (which in turn translates to unnecessary millions of ‘refugees’), to examine worldwide threats, notably the case of Islamic extremism, to avert the existing dangers, to address all major issues (Food and Water, Energy, Labor, Worldwide Competitiveness, Security, Health, Education, Internet-Mobile Telephony-Disruptive Technology, and the inevitable termination of the Welfare State), and to envision common national and supranational survival in an exceptionally different future.

The old guard of European statesmen and politicians proved to be too small, too mean, and too conventional to possibly stand the exam. Their traditional practice to please all the important groups of power by means of endless compromises, their unconditional relativism, their tactics to promise everything to everyone, and their absurd aversion to fix strict limits to their concepts, principles and values made them look absolutely useless. This situation was exemplified by Jacques Chirac, who was foolish enough not to realize that, when you don’t stand for your values, you get supplanted. Elasticity is not a virtue for emperors.

And this is what really happened in Europe; the old guard of European statesmen and politicians, provenly useless, got effectively supplanted by valueless aliens and enemies of the European culture, who can easily promote by means of lawless laws any sort of bestial and villainous absurdity to a supposed ‘value’, only thanks to the long lasting relativism that corrupted the European societies. 

The rise of a self-destructive establishment in Europe did not and will not end up with its subordination to the US; this is so because the American society collapsed too due to the rise of similar chaotic and inhuman elements and groups. And this is exactly what the old guard of European statesmen and politicians (Reagan, Thatcher, Kohl and Chirac) failed to understand: it they put strict limits, stated their purposes clearly, and clashed with the disparate, corrupt and chaotic elements of the Evil Left, there would be a thunderous clash and they would eliminate the evilness, preventing the corruption from spreading across their societies. Their conformism, compromises and conventionalism (superbly described and decried by the perspicacious Pope Benedict XVI as ‘relativism’) did actually ensure calmness and placidity in their time only to bring about corruption, disintegration, and dissolution 20-30 years later. 

Now, alas, it will take extreme brutality, foremost violence, and overwhelming totalitarianism to save the European Union; but what will be saved will have nothing to do with ‘democracy’, ‘human rights’, ‘civil rights’, and ‘republican’ states. It will come with dozens of millions of dead on European soil and -above all- with fierce countenance. Many expect it to be based in Eastern Europe; they believe that the land of Russia, east of Moscow, the confines of Volga Bulgaria, the periphery of the Tatars, and Sibir (Siberia), as far as Chelyabinsk, are the world’s most blessed Earth as past covenant and future pledge. It may appear to be like the Jack of all trades; what Christianity and Islam failed to achieve with their interminable wars, Tengrism and Shamanism may eventually achieve. And who knows? Those who wanted for more than 100 years to consecrate Russia may see their urban state desecrated forever! I guess one would even call it orbital deformity!

What was then Duroselle’s error? I would not call it like that; as a matter of fact, it was an oversight. Although he fortunately avoided referring to nonsensical lines of division of which others were fascinated, he did not explicitly state that in Eastern Europe the only possibly peaceful borders are those between Austria-Hungary, Imperial Germany, and Czarist Russia.

———————————————————-

Download the article:

Призыв к блестящой книге Жана Батиста Дюрозеля «Европа: история ее народов»

Известный французский академик Жан Батист Дюрозель был уполномочен Комиссией Европейского Союза (в то время Европейских Сообществ) и лично Жаком Делором написать «Европейскую историю Европы». Эта книга обосновывает создание Европейского Союза во 2-й половине 20-го века. как венец всех предыдущих усилий по созданию единого государства на континенте. Книга была написана на французском языке (L’Europe: histoire de ses peuples, Paris, Perrin, 1990, 708 стр.) и должна была стать (как она действительно стала) основным учебником европейской истории для среднего образования всех Государства-члены ЕС. По этой причине на местном уровне были произведены многочисленные переводы, и таким образом книга стала краеугольным камнем европейской идентичности; что касается стран, которые не были государствами-членами в 1990 г., но стали позже, книга была переведена на официальный язык (или официальные языки) каждой страны после ее присоединения.

Как и следовало ожидать, шовинистическое, расистское и фальшиво-европейское государство Греция составляло исключение.

Славян принимают за греков

Созданная колониальными державами Франции и Англии как псевдогосударство и орудие западноевропейских замыслов против Османской империи, «Греция» впервые в мировой истории стала названием государства в соответствии с Эдирнскими/Адрианопольскими договорами. в 1829 г. и Лондонский протокол в 1830 г. В прошлом «греческий» («эллин») был самым уничижительным термином для более чем 1100 лет христианско-римского и восточно-римского правления (330-1453 гг.), тогда как «Греция» была просто географический термин, используемый для обозначения этой маргинальной и в остальном бесполезной провинции.

Эта провинция была последним вместилищем VI в. н.э. катастрофический приток славян. Это массовое вторжение положило безвозвратный конец существованию грекоязычного народа на Южных Балканах. Император Восточной Римской империи Константин Багрянородный писал об этом факте, но псевдоисторики сегодняшнего расистского греческого государства получают зарплату как фальшивые профессора, чтобы дискредитировать этого высокоинтеллектуального императора!

Исповедь древнегреческого небытия

Еще до христианизации Римской империи знаменитый эдикт Каракаллы (Constitutio Antoniniana; 212 г. н.э.) ясно дал понять, что в Римской империи не было «греков», кроме как языковой особенности; безоговорочно согласившись стать гражданами Римской империи, все грекоязычные люди на Балканах (юг Македонии), в Анатолии (Малая Азия) и в других местах признали, что не было греческой интеллектуальной, идеологической, имперской или политической, социально-поведенческой и государственной идентичности. До римского вторжения и последующего объединения всех земель вокруг Средиземноморья «Греция» была просто географическим термином, обозначающим земли к югу от Македонии и Иллирии; но не было этнического, племенного, языкового, интеллектуального, духовного, религиозного, не говоря уже о государственном, единства. Вот почему они убивали друг друга, как мух; а их историографы были низкого уровня, потому что они так и не достигли должного духовного и имперского уровня посвящения. Другими словами, они так и не стали настоящими, безличными и объективными имперскими писцами. Вот почему они писали свой бред (подобно Фукидиду), бесполезно распространяясь на гражданские войны, которые еще больше разжигали ненависть, злобу, раздоры, вражду и войны среди этого несчастного населения.

Столицей Александра был Вавилон, а не Пелла, не Афины!

Только два иностранных царя, Филипп II Македонский и его сын и преемник Александр, вторглись и наложили временный порядок на эти хаотичные элементы. Но Александр презирал все греческое, поэтому он выбрал Вавилон столицей, а согдийскую царевну Роксану женой, после того как заменил себя Дарием III, став таким образом шахом Иранской империи.

Колониальная лесть и имперские обещания южнобалканским бродягам

Еще хуже обстояло дело в южных балканских пределах в 1821-1828 гг., потому что в жилах местного населения славянского, албанского, турецкого, влахского и иного происхождения не было ни капли древнегреческой крови; они говорили на множестве разных языков, и единственным средством общения между ними был османский турецкий язык. Этому несчастному населению преступные колониальные гангстеры, после того, как выдавали себя за «филэллинов» и рассказывали дешевый вздор для идиотов, продавали ложь о якобы славном прошлом, гипотетическим потомком которого будет этот жалкий народ.

Фальшивый новогреческий язык для поддержки псевдогреческого расизма

Поверив в злобно сконструированный псевдомиф об эллинизме, эти группы населения были вынуждены изучать заранее сфабрикованную (находящимся во Франции Адамантиосом Корайсом) идиому (который навязывался в школах диктаторским и геноцидным образом) и были одурачены в течение двух столетий подряд.

Им постоянно рассказывали параноидальную ложь о так называемом великолепии вымышленных древних греков, которые «цивилизовали мир». Это превратило ужасно жалкую и этнически ублюдочную псевдонацию в непомерно высокомерных хвастунов, чья жизнь зависит от непрерывного и истерического осуждения всех других, соседних или нет, наций (особенно македонцев, болгар, албанцев, турок и иранцев) как культурно «низших» людей – предки которых были (опять же гипотетически) «цивилизованы» предками сегодняшних греков!!!

Сегодняшняя Греция действительно является расистским государством по преимуществу.

Затем пришел Жан Батист Дюрозель!

Своей превосходной книгой Дюрозель почти автоматически высмеял всех клоунов греческих поддельных университетов (до сих пор в псевдодемократической, криптототалитарной Греции запрещено создавать частные университеты), в которых невежественные историки, идиотские археологи, бессмысленные политологи, клоунские эллинисты и абсолютно шарлатанские византинологи (sic!) работают (или действуют, если хотите) – не проводить истинные, подлинные исследования, а раболепно поддерживать преступную, расистскую догму эллинизма, которая является наихудшей формой нацизма из когда-либо существовавших.

Гнев шовинистической псевдогреческой толпы против Дюрозеля

Затем, в 1990 году, из-за требования ЕС перевести книгу Дюрозеля на греческий язык, вся ментальная нечистота необразованной, невежественной и дряхлой греческой толпы захлестнула средства массовой информации, распространяя беспрецедентные оскорбления в адрес Дюрозеля, ЕС, Европы, европейских университетов и… остаток мира! Интеллектуально преступные, академически зловонные и умственно жалкие профессора университетов и академики Греции либо хранили молчание, либо встали на сторону толпы, чтобы стать более популярными как якобы защищающие «права» «греческой» нации. Эта ситуация свидетельствует о хорошо скрываемой реальности; фальшивые греки последних двух столетий, которые на самом деле представляют собой испорченное население, лишенное своей истинной восточно-римской (не «византийской») православной идентичности, никогда не чувствовали себя «европейской» нацией. Поэтому их огромный психологический комплекс неполноценности проявляется каждый раз, когда какое-либо реальное событие подчеркивает, что они — второсортная, необразованная псевдострана, без целостности, без дисциплины, без правил, без морали и без смысла существования.

Юго-восточными границами Европы являются границы Албании, Македонии и Болгарии.

Я считаю самым выдающимся достижением своей жизни и самой большой честью то, что я лично защитил Жана Батиста Дюрозеля, его книгу и академически-интеллектуальный подход от всех тех негодяев (толпа и нацистская элита и государство Греции), которые нашли мою Мольбу из 2800 слов для Книга Жана Батиста Дюрозеля как хороший повод оскорбить и меня и выгнать.

Анти-Дюрозельская истерия в Греции и грядущий конец Греции

Мольба была опубликована в греческом еженедельнике Oikonomikos Tahydromos 7 февраля 1991 года, хотя была написана 30 августа 1990 года.

Это вызвало более 30 бессмысленных, оскорбительных и нелепых ответов как от предвзятых ученых (которые писали против меня только для «оправдания» позиций, которые они занимали, не имея надлежащей квалификации — что является очень распространенным случаем в никчемном псевдогосударстве «Греция» ) или необразованная толпа, принявшая защиту мною исторической правды за лично для них оскорбительную! Такова их испорченность, что они не могут понять, что единственное, чего они в конце концов добьются таким образом, — это полное ядерное уничтожение Греции.

О Жане-Батите Дюрозеле:

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Baptiste_Duroselle

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Дюрозель,_Жан-Батист

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Baptiste_Duroselle

О книге:

https://www.fayard.fr/pluriel/leurope-histoire-de-ses-peuples-9782012789128

Случайные образцы рецензий на книги:

https://www.persee.fr/doc/polit_0032-342x_1992_num_57_1_4109_t1_0203_0000_2

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/026569149402400105?journalCode=ehqb

https://www.academia.edu/42087294/History_or_Politics_Revisiting_Jean_Baptiste_Duroselles_Projection_of_the_European_Identity

Для греческих читателей:

https://www.academia.edu/86544955/Κοσμάς_Μεγαλομμάτης_Συνηγορία_υπέρ_της_Ιστορίας_Ντυροζέλ_1990_

https://www.academia.edu/50793544/_Μόνον_ο_Ντυροζέλ_δικαιώθηκε_Αρβελέρ_Μεγαλομμάτης_και_η_Ελληνική_Παθογένεια

https://www.academia.edu/50797147/Ντυροζέλ_Αρβελέρ_Μεγαλομμάτης_κι_η_Ελληνική_Παθογένεια_ΙΙ_Ο_Αμόρφωτος_Ελύτης_κι_οι_Βλακείες_του

https://www.academia.edu/50816877/Ντυροζέλ_Αρβελέρ_Πλούταρχος_Όσιρις_και_η_Ακαδημαϊκή_Ζωή_της_Γαλλίας_η_Ελένη_Αρβελέρ_στις_όντως_Μικρές_Διαστάσεις_της_και_η_εν_Ελλάδι_Άθλια_Άγνοια

———————————————————————–

Скачать статью:

Plaidoyer pour le livre brillant de Jean Baptiste Duroselle, L’Europe : une histoire de ses peuples

Le célèbre académicien français Jean Baptiste Duroselle a été chargé par la Commission de l’Union européenne (Communautés européennes à l’époque) et Jacques Delors personnellement d’écrire une Histoire européenne de l’Europe. Ce livre justifierait la création de l’Union européenne dans la 2e moitié du 20e s. comme la couronne de tous les efforts antérieurs pour établir un État à travers le continent. Le livre a été écrit en français (L’Europe : histoire de ses peuples, Paris, Perrin, 1990, 708 p.) et il était destiné à devenir (comme il est en effet devenu) le manuel de base d’histoire européenne pour l’enseignement secondaire de tous. États membres de l’UE. Pour cette raison, de nombreuses traductions ont été produites au niveau local, et le livre est ainsi devenu la pierre angulaire de l’identité européenne ; en ce qui concerne les pays qui n’étaient pas membres en 1990 mais le sont devenus plus tard, le livre a été traduit dans la langue officielle (ou les langues officielles) de chaque pays après son adhésion.

Comme on pouvait s’y attendre, l’État grec chauvin, raciste et pseudo-européen a fait exception.

Des Slaves pris pour des Grecs

Produite par les puissances coloniales de la France et de l’Angleterre en tant que pseudo-État et outil des stratagèmes d’Europe occidentale contre l’Empire ottoman, la « Grèce » est devenue pour la première fois dans l’histoire mondiale le nom d’un État, à la suite des traités d’Edirne / Andrinople, en 1829 et le Protocole de Londres en 1830. Dans le passé, ‘grec’ (‘hellène’) était un terme des plus péjoratifs pendant plus de 1100 ans de règne chrétien romain et romain oriental (330-1453), alors que ‘Grèce’ était simplement un terme géographique utilisé pour désigner cette province marginale et autrement inutile.

Cette province fut le dernier réceptacle du cataclysmique afflux slave durant le VIe s. de notre ère. Cette invasion massive a mis un terme irrévocable à l’existence des personnes grécophones dans les Balkans du Sud. L’empereur romain d’Orient Constantin Porphyrogenitus a écrit à ce sujet, mais les pseudo-historiens de l’État grec raciste d’aujourd’hui reçoivent leurs salaires de faux professeurs afin de discréditer cet empereur hautement intellectuel!

Confession du néant grec ancien

Même avant la christianisation de l’Empire romain, le célèbre édit de Caracalla (Constitutio Antoniniana; 212 CE) indiquait clairement qu’il n’y avait pas de «Grecs» sauf en tant que particularité linguistique au sein de l’Empire romain; en acceptant sans condition de devenir citoyens de l’Empire romain, tous les peuples de langue grecque des Balkans (au sud de la Macédoine), d’Anatolie (Asie Mineure) et d’ailleurs ont admis qu’il n’y avait pas d’identité grecque intellectuelle, idéologique, impériale ou politique, socio-comportementale et étatique. Avant les invasions romaines et l’unification ultérieure de toutes les terres autour de la Méditerranée, la « Grèce » était simplement un terme géographique désignant les terres au sud de la Macédoine et de l’Illyrie ; mais il n’y avait pas d’unité ethnique, tribale, linguistique, intellectuelle, spirituelle, religieuse et encore moins gouvernementale. C’est pourquoi ils s’entretuaient comme des mouches ; et leurs historiographes de bas niveau, qui n’ont jamais atteint le niveau d’initiation spirituel et impérial requis pour devenir des scribes impériaux appropriés, impersonnels et objectifs, ont écrit leurs absurdités (comme Thucydide) en décrivant inutilement les guerres civiles – qui ont encore proliféré la haine, la rancœur, les conflits, l’inimitié et des guerres parmi ces misérables populations.

La capitale d’Alexandre était Babylone, pas Pella, pas Athènes !

Seuls deux rois étrangers, Philippe II de Macédoine et son fils et successeur Alexandre, ont envahi et imposé un ordre temporaire à ces éléments chaotiques. Mais Alexandre méprisait tout ce qui était grec, et c’est pourquoi il choisit Babylone comme capitale et la princesse sogdienne Roxanne comme épouse, après s’être substitué à Darius III, devenant ainsi Shah de l’Empire iranien.

Flatterie coloniale et promesses impériales aux vagabonds des Balkans du Sud

Or, la situation était encore pire dans les confins des Balkans du Sud en 1821-1828, car même pas une goutte de sang de la Grèce antique ne pouvait être trouvée dans les veines des populations locales d’origine slave, albanaise, turque, valaque et autre ; ils parlaient de nombreuses langues différentes et le seul moyen de communication entre eux était le turc ottoman. A ces populations malchanceuses, les gangsters coloniaux criminels, après s’être fait passer pour des «Philhellènes» et raconté des absurdités bon marché pour des idiots, ont vendu l’illusion d’un passé soi-disant glorieux dont cette population misérable serait la progéniture hypothétique.

Fausse langue grecque moderne pour soutenir le racisme pseudo-grec

Croyant au pseudo-mythe vicieusement construit de l’hellénisme, ces populations ont été forcées d’apprendre un idiome préfabriqué (par Adamantios Korais qui était basé en France), qui a été imposé dans les écoles de manière dictatoriale et génocidaire. Ainsi elles ont été dupées pendant deux siècles consécutifs.

On leur racontait sans cesse des mensonges paranoïaques sur la soi-disant splendeur des Grecs antiques fictifs qui « avaient civilisé le monde ». Cela a transformé la pseudo-nation exécrablement misérable et ethniquement bâtarde en fanfarons exorbitants et arrogants dont la vie dépend de mépriser sans cesse et hystériquement toutes les autres nations, voisines ou non (notamment les Macédoniens, les Bulgares, les Albanais, les Turcs et les Iraniens) en tant que personnes culturellement ‘inférieures’ – dont les ancêtres ont été (hypothétiquement encore) ‘civilisés’ par les ancêtres des Grecs d’aujourd’hui !!!

La Grèce d’aujourd’hui est bien l’État raciste par excellence.

Puis, Jean Baptiste Duroselle est arrivé!

Avec son superbe livre, Duroselle a quasi-automatiquement ridiculisé tous les clowns des fausses-universités grecques (encore aujourd’hui, il est interdit de créer une université privée dans la Grèce pseudo-démocratique et crypto-totalitaire) où travaillent (ou performent si vous voulez) des historiens ignorants, des archéologues idiots, des politologues insensés, des hellénistes grotesques et des byzantinologues (sic !) absolument charlatanesques – non pas pour mener des recherches vraies et authentiques mais pour soutenir servilement le dogme criminel et raciste de l’hellénisme, qui est la pire forme de nazisme qui ait jamais existé.

La colère de la foule pseudo-grecque chauvine contre Duroselle

Puis, en 1990, en raison de la demande de l’UE pour une traduction grecque du livre de Duroselle, tous les égouts mentaux de la foule grecque inculte, ignorante et décrépite ont inondé les médias de masse en répandant des insultes sans précédent contre Duroselle, l’UE, l’Europe, les universités européennes et… le reste du monde! Les professeurs d’universités et les académiciens grecs – intellectuellement criminels, intellectuellement malodorants et mentalement pathétiques – ont gardé le silence ou se sont rangés du côté de la foule pour devenir plus populaires en tant que soi-disant défenseurs des «droits» de la nation «grecque». Cette situation témoigne d’une réalité bien cachée ; les faux Grecs des deux derniers siècles, qui sont en réalité une population défigurée privée de sa véritable identité orthodoxe romaine orientale (et non «byzantine»), ne se sont jamais sentis comme une nation «européenne». Leur immense complexe psychologique d’infériorité s’exprime donc chaque fois qu’un événement réel souligne qu’ils sont un pseudo-pays de seconde classe, sans éducation, sans intégrité, sans discipline, sans règle, sans morale et sans raison d’existence.

Les frontières sud-est de l’Europe sont celles de l’Albanie, de la Macédoine et de la Bulgarie.

Je considère comme la réalisation la plus remarquable de ma vie et comme l’honneur le plus distinct que j’ai défendu personnellement Jean Baptiste Duroselle, son livre et son approche académique et intellectuelle contre tous ces coquins (la foule, l’élite et l’état nazis de Grèce), qui ont trouvé mon plaidoyer de 2800 mots pour Le livre de Jean Baptiste Duroselle comme une bonne raison de m’insulter aussi et de me forcer à ne plus renter en Grèce.

L’hystérie anti-Duroselle en Grèce et la fin prochaine de la Grèce

Le plaidoyer a été publié dans l’hebdomadaire grec Oikonomikos Tahydromos le 7 février 1991, bien qu’il ait été rédigé et envoyé le 30 août 1990. Cela a généré plus de 30 réponses absurdes, insultantes et ridicules de la part d’universitaires partiaux (qui ont écrit contre moi uniquement pour « justifier » les postes qu’ils occupaient sans être correctement qualifiés – ce qui est le cas très courant dans le pseudo-État sans mérite « la Grèce » ) ou  de la part d’ une foule inculte et des gens qui ont pris la défense de la vérité historique par moi comme une insulte personnelle pour eux! Telle est leur dépravation qu’ils ne peuvent pas se rendre compte que la seule chose qu’ils obtiendront finalement de cette manière est l’anéantissement nucléaire total de la Grèce.

À propos de Jean-Baptiste Duroselle :

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Baptiste_Duroselle

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Дюрозель,_Жан-Батист

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Baptiste_Duroselle

À propos du livre:

https://www.fayard.fr/pluriel/leurope-histoire-de-ses-peuples-9782012789128

Critiques du livre:

https://www.persee.fr/doc/polit_0032-342x_1992_num_57_1_4109_t1_0203_0000_2

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/026569149402400105?journalCode=ehqb

https://www.academia.edu/42087294/History_or_Politics_Revisiting_Jean_Baptiste_Duroselles_Projection_of_the_European_Identity

Pour le lectorat grec:

https://www.academia.edu/86544955/Κοσμάς_Μεγαλομμάτης_Συνηγορία_υπέρ_της_Ιστορίας_Ντυροζέλ_1990_

https://www.academia.edu/50793544/_Μόνον_ο_Ντυροζέλ_δικαιώθηκε_Αρβελέρ_Μεγαλομμάτης_και_η_Ελληνική_Παθογένεια

https://www.academia.edu/50797147/Ντυροζέλ_Αρβελέρ_Μεγαλομμάτης_κι_η_Ελληνική_Παθογένεια_ΙΙ_Ο_Αμόρφωτος_Ελύτης_κι_οι_Βλακείες_του

https://www.academia.edu/50816877/Ντυροζέλ_Αρβελέρ_Πλούταρχος_Όσιρις_και_η_Ακαδημαϊκή_Ζωή_της_Γαλλίας_η_Ελένη_Αρβελέρ_στις_όντως_Μικρές_Διαστάσεις_της_και_η_εν_Ελλάδι_Άθλια_Άγνοια

——————————————————–

Télécharger l’article:

Plea for Jean Baptiste Duroselle’s Brilliant Book, Europe: A History of its Peoples

The famous French academician Jean Baptiste Duroselle was commissioned by the Commission of the European Union (European Communities at the time) and Jacques Delors personally to author a European History of Europe, which would justify the establishment of the European Union in the 2nd half of the 20th c. as the crown of all earlier efforts to establish one state across the continent. The book was written in French (L’Europe: histoire de ses peuples, Paris, Perrin, 1990, 708 p.) and it was geared to become (as it really did) the basic textbook of European History for the secondary education of all EU member states. For this reason, numerous translations were produced at the local level, and the book became in this manner the cornerstone of the European identity; as regards countries that were not member-states in 1990 but became later, the book was translated to the official language(s) of each country after its adhesion.

As one could anticipate, the chauvinist, racist, and bogus-European state of Greece made the exception.

Slavs taken for Greeks

Being produced by the colonial powers of France and England as a pseudo-state-tool for Western European schemes against the Ottoman Empire, ‘Greece’ became for the first time in World History the name of a state, following the treaties of Edirne / Adrianople in 1829 and the London Protocol in 1830. In the past, ‘Greek’ (‘Hellene’) was a most pejorative term for more than 1100 years of Christian Roman and Eastern Roman rule (330-1453), whereas ‘Greece’ was used as a merely geographical term for this marginal and otherwise useless province which was the final receptacle of the 6th c. CE cataclysmic Slavic influx that put an irrevocable end to the existence of the Greek-speaking people in South Balkans. Eastern Roman Emperor Constantine Porphyrogenitus wrote about this fact, but the pseudo-historians of today’s racist Greek state get their salaries as fake professors in order to discredit this highly intellectual emperor!

Confession of the Ancient Greek Nothingness

Even before the Christianization of the Roman Empire, the famous Edict of Caracalla (Constitutio Antoniniana; 212 CE) made it clear that there were no ‘Greeks’ except as a linguistic particularity within the Roman Empire; by unconditionally accepting to become citizens of the Roman Empire, all the Greek speaking people in the Balkans (south of Macedonia), in Anatolia (Asia Minor), and elsewhere admitted that there was no Greek intellectual, ideological, imperial or political, socio-behavioral and state identity. Before the Roman invasion and the subsequent unification of all lands around the Mediterranean, ‘Greece’ was simply a geographical term denoting lands south of Macedonia and Illyria; but there was no ethnic, tribal, linguistic, intellectual, spiritual, religious -let alone governmental- unity. That is why they were killing one another like flies; and their low level historiographers, who never attained the due spiritual and imperial level initiation to become proper, impersonal and objective, imperial scribes, wrote their nonsense (like Thucydides) uselessly expanding on civil wars – which further proliferated hatred, rancor, strife, enmity and wars among those wretched populations. 

Alexander’s Capital was Babylon, not Pella, not Athens!

Only two foreign kings, Philip II of Macedon and his son and successor Alexander, invaded and imposed temporary order on those chaotic elements. But Alexander despised all things Greek, and that’s why he chose Babylon as capital and the Sogdian princess Roxanne as wife, after he substituted himself to Darius III, thus becoming the Shah of the Iranian Empire.

Colonial flattery and imperial promises to South Balkan vagabonds

Now, the situation was even worse in the South Balkan confines in 1821-1828, because not even a droplet of Ancient Greek blood could be found in the veins of the local populations of Slavic, Albanian, Turkish, Vlachic, and other origin; they were speaking numerous different languages and the only means of communication among them was Ottoman Turkish. To those misfortunate populations the criminal colonial gangsters, after posturing as ‘Philhellenes’ and narrating cheap flimflam for idiots, sold the fallacy of a supposedly glorious past of which that wretched populace would be the hypothetical offspring.

Fake Modern Greek language to support Pseudo-Greek Racism

Believing the viciously constructed pseudo-myth of Hellenism, those populations were forced to learn a prefabricated (by the France-based Adamantios Korais) idiom (which was imposed in the schools in a dictatorial and genocidal manner) and were fooled for two consecutive centuries, being incessantly told paranoid lies about the so-called splendor of the fictional Ancient Greeks who ‘had civilized the world’. This turned the execrably miserable and ethnically bastard pseudo-nation to exorbitantly arrogant braggarts whose lives depend on ceaselessly and hysterically deprecating all the other, neighboring or not, nations (notably the Macedonians, the Bulgarians, the Albanians, the Turks, and the Iranians) as culturally ‘lower’ people – whose ancestors were (hypothetically again) ‘civilized’ by the ancestors of today’s Greeks!!!

Today’s Greece is indeed the racist state par excellence.

Then, Jean Baptiste Duroselle came!  

With his superb book, Duroselle quasi-automatically ridiculed all the clowns of the Greek bogus-universities (still today, it is prohibited to establish a private university in pseudo-democratic, crypto-totalitarian Greece) whereby ignorant historians, idiotic archaeologists, nonsensical political scientists, clownish Hellenists, and absolutely charlatanesque Byzantinologists (sic!) work (or perform if you like) – not to carry out true, genuine research but to subserviently support the criminal, racist dogma of Hellenism, which is the worst form of Nazism that has ever existed.

The chauvinist pseudo-Greek mob’s anger against Duroselle

Then, in 1990, due to the EU demand for a Greek translation of Duroselle’s book, all the mental sewerage of the uneducated, ignorant and decrepit Greek mob flooded the mass media spreading unprecedented insults against Duroselle, EU, Europe, European universities and … the rest of the world! The intellectually felonious, academically malodorous, and mentally pathetic professors of universities and academicians of Greece either kept silent or sided with the mob to become more popular as supposedly defending the ‘rights’ of the ‘Greek’ nation. This situation testifies to a well-concealed reality; the fake Greeks of the last two centuries, who are in reality a defaced populace deprived of their true Eastern Roman (not ‘Byzantine’) Orthodox identity, never felt as a ‘European’ nation. Their immense psychological complex of inferiority is therefore expressed every time a real event underscores that they are a second class, uneducated pseudo-country with no integrity, no discipline, no rule, no morals, and reason of existence.

The southeastern borders of Europe are those of Albania, Macedonia and Bulgaria.

I consider as my life’s most outstanding achievement and most distinct honor that I defended Jean Baptiste Duroselle personally and his book and academic-intellectual approach against all those rascals (the mob and the Nazi elite and state of Greece), who found my 2800-word Plea for Jean Baptiste Duroselle’s book as a good reason to insult me as well and to force me out.

The anti-Duroselle hysteria in Greece and the forthcoming end of Greece

The Plea was published in the Greek weekly Oikonomikos Tahydromos on the 7th February 1991, although it was written and sent on 30th August 1990. It generated more than 30 nonsensical, insulting and ridiculous responses from either biased academics (who wrote against me only to ‘justify’ the positions that they held without being properly qualified – which is the very common case in the meritless pseudo-state ‘Greece’) or uneducated mob that mistook the defense of the historical truth by me as personally insulting for them! Such is their depravity that they cannot realize that the only thing that they will finally achieve in this manner is the total nuclear annihilation of Greece.

About Jean-Baptiste Duroselle:   

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Baptiste_Duroselle

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Дюрозель,_Жан-Батист

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Baptiste_Duroselle

About the book:

https://www.fayard.fr/pluriel/leurope-histoire-de-ses-peuples-9782012789128

Random samples of book reviews:

https://www.persee.fr/doc/polit_0032-342x_1992_num_57_1_4109_t1_0203_0000_2

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/026569149402400105?journalCode=ehqb

https://www.academia.edu/42087294/History_or_Politics_Revisiting_Jean_Baptiste_Duroselles_Projection_of_the_European_Identity

For Greek readership:

https://www.academia.edu/86544955/Κοσμάς_Μεγαλομμάτης_Συνηγορία_υπέρ_της_Ιστορίας_Ντυροζέλ_1990_

https://www.academia.edu/50793544/_Μόνον_ο_Ντυροζέλ_δικαιώθηκε_Αρβελέρ_Μεγαλομμάτης_και_η_Ελληνική_Παθογένεια

https://www.academia.edu/50797147/Ντυροζέλ_Αρβελέρ_Μεγαλομμάτης_κι_η_Ελληνική_Παθογένεια_ΙΙ_Ο_Αμόρφωτος_Ελύτης_κι_οι_Βλακείες_του

https://www.academia.edu/50816877/Ντυροζέλ_Αρβελέρ_Πλούταρχος_Όσιρις_και_η_Ακαδημαϊκή_Ζωή_της_Γαλλίας_η_Ελένη_Αρβελέρ_στις_όντως_Μικρές_Διαστάσεις_της_και_η_εν_Ελλάδι_Άθλια_Άγνοια

————————————————–

Download the article in Word doc.:

La Grèce entre l’Europe et le Tiers Monde

La Grèce entre l’Europe et le Tiers Monde

Prof. Dr. Mohamed Chams Ad-dın MEGALOMMATİS  

http://www.atam.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/Mohamed-Chams-Ad-d%C4%B1n-MEGALOMMAT%C4%B0S-La-Grece-Entre-l%E2%80%99Europe-et-le-Tiers-Monde.pdf

29.jpg

Document-page-001.jpg

Document-page-002.jpg

Document-page-003.jpg

Document-page-004.jpg

Document-page-005.jpg

Document-page-006.jpg

Document-page-007.jpg

Document-page-008.jpg

Document-page-009.jpg

Document-page-010.jpg