The famous French academician Jean Baptiste Duroselle was commissioned by the Commission of the European Union (European Communities at the time) and Jacques Delors personally to author a European History of Europe, which would justify the establishment of the European Union in the 2nd half of the 20th c. as the crown of all earlier efforts to establish one state across the continent. The book was written in French (L’Europe: histoire de ses peuples, Paris, Perrin, 1990, 708 p.) and it was geared to become (as it really did) the basic textbook of European History for the secondary education of all EU member states. For this reason, numerous translations were produced at the local level, and the book became in this manner the cornerstone of the European identity; as regards countries that were not member-states in 1990 but became later, the book was translated to the official language(s) of each country after its adhesion.
As one could anticipate, the chauvinist, racist, and bogus-European state of Greece made the exception.
Slavs taken for Greeks
Being produced by the colonial powers of France and England as a pseudo-state-tool for Western European schemes against the Ottoman Empire, ‘Greece’ became for the first time in World History the name of a state, following the treaties of Edirne / Adrianople in 1829 and the London Protocol in 1830. In the past, ‘Greek’ (‘Hellene’) was a most pejorative term for more than 1100 years of Christian Roman and Eastern Roman rule (330-1453), whereas ‘Greece’ was used as a merely geographical term for this marginal and otherwise useless province which was the final receptacle of the 6th c. CE cataclysmic Slavic influx that put an irrevocable end to the existence of the Greek-speaking people in South Balkans. Eastern Roman Emperor Constantine Porphyrogenitus wrote about this fact, but the pseudo-historians of today’s racist Greek state get their salaries as fake professors in order to discredit this highly intellectual emperor!
Confession of the Ancient Greek Nothingness
Even before the Christianization of the Roman Empire, the famous Edict of Caracalla (Constitutio Antoniniana; 212 CE) made it clear that there were no ‘Greeks’ except as a linguistic particularity within the Roman Empire; by unconditionally accepting to become citizens of the Roman Empire, all the Greek speaking people in the Balkans (south of Macedonia), in Anatolia (Asia Minor), and elsewhere admitted that there was no Greek intellectual, ideological, imperial or political, socio-behavioral and state identity. Before the Roman invasion and the subsequent unification of all lands around the Mediterranean, ‘Greece’ was simply a geographical term denoting lands south of Macedonia and Illyria; but there was no ethnic, tribal, linguistic, intellectual, spiritual, religious -let alone governmental- unity. That is why they were killing one another like flies; and their low level historiographers, who never attained the due spiritual and imperial level initiation to become proper, impersonal and objective, imperial scribes, wrote their nonsense (like Thucydides) uselessly expanding on civil wars – which further proliferated hatred, rancor, strife, enmity and wars among those wretched populations.
Alexander’s Capital was Babylon, not Pella, not Athens!
Only two foreign kings, Philip II of Macedon and his son and successor Alexander, invaded and imposed temporary order on those chaotic elements. But Alexander despised all things Greek, and that’s why he chose Babylon as capital and the Sogdian princess Roxanne as wife, after he substituted himself to Darius III, thus becoming the Shah of the Iranian Empire.
Colonial flattery and imperial promises to South Balkan vagabonds
Now, the situation was even worse in the South Balkan confines in 1821-1828, because not even a droplet of Ancient Greek blood could be found in the veins of the local populations of Slavic, Albanian, Turkish, Vlachic, and other origin; they were speaking numerous different languages and the only means of communication among them was Ottoman Turkish. To those misfortunate populations the criminal colonial gangsters, after posturing as ‘Philhellenes’ and narrating cheap flimflam for idiots, sold the fallacy of a supposedly glorious past of which that wretched populace would be the hypothetical offspring.
Fake Modern Greek language to support Pseudo-Greek Racism
Believing the viciously constructed pseudo-myth of Hellenism, those populations were forced to learn a prefabricated (by the France-based Adamantios Korais) idiom (which was imposed in the schools in a dictatorial and genocidal manner) and were fooled for two consecutive centuries, being incessantly told paranoid lies about the so-called splendor of the fictional Ancient Greeks who ‘had civilized the world’. This turned the execrably miserable and ethnically bastard pseudo-nation to exorbitantly arrogant braggarts whose lives depend on ceaselessly and hysterically deprecating all the other, neighboring or not, nations (notably the Macedonians, the Bulgarians, the Albanians, the Turks, and the Iranians) as culturally ‘lower’ people – whose ancestors were (hypothetically again) ‘civilized’ by the ancestors of today’s Greeks!!!
Today’s Greece is indeed the racist state par excellence.
Then, Jean Baptiste Duroselle came!
With his superb book, Duroselle quasi-automatically ridiculed all the clowns of the Greek bogus-universities (still today, it is prohibited to establish a private university in pseudo-democratic, crypto-totalitarian Greece) whereby ignorant historians, idiotic archaeologists, nonsensical political scientists, clownish Hellenists, and absolutely charlatanesque Byzantinologists (sic!) work (or perform if you like) – not to carry out true, genuine research but to subserviently support the criminal, racist dogma of Hellenism, which is the worst form of Nazism that has ever existed.
The chauvinist pseudo-Greek mob’s anger against Duroselle
Then, in 1990, due to the EU demand for a Greek translation of Duroselle’s book, all the mental sewerage of the uneducated, ignorant and decrepit Greek mob flooded the mass media spreading unprecedented insults against Duroselle, EU, Europe, European universities and … the rest of the world! The intellectually felonious, academically malodorous, and mentally pathetic professors of universities and academicians of Greece either kept silent or sided with the mob to become more popular as supposedly defending the ‘rights’ of the ‘Greek’ nation. This situation testifies to a well-concealed reality; the fake Greeks of the last two centuries, who are in reality a defaced populace deprived of their true Eastern Roman (not ‘Byzantine’) Orthodox identity, never felt as a ‘European’ nation. Their immense psychological complex of inferiority is therefore expressed every time a real event underscores that they are a second class, uneducated pseudo-country with no integrity, no discipline, no rule, no morals, and reason of existence.
The southeastern borders of Europe are those of Albania, Macedonia and Bulgaria.
I consider as my life’s most outstanding achievement and most distinct honor that I defended Jean Baptiste Duroselle personally and his book and academic-intellectual approach against all those rascals (the mob and the Nazi elite and state of Greece), who found my 2800-word Plea for Jean Baptiste Duroselle’s book as a good reason to insult me as well and to force me out.
The anti-Duroselle hysteria in Greece and the forthcoming end of Greece
The Plea was published in the Greek weekly Oikonomikos Tahydromos on the 7th February 1991, although it was written and sent on 30th August 1990. It generated more than 30 nonsensical, insulting and ridiculous responses from either biased academics (who wrote against me only to ‘justify’ the positions that they held without being properly qualified – which is the very common case in the meritless pseudo-state ‘Greece’) or uneducated mob that mistook the defense of the historical truth by me as personally insulting for them! Such is their depravity that they cannot realize that the only thing that they will finally achieve in this manner is the total nuclear annihilation of Greece.
The Earth is one and undividable; the historical presence of several major empires over the past 45 centuries does not consist in a division but rather in a union around the same human, universalist-ecumenist ideals. From Sargon of Akkad (薩爾貢/سارگون) to the Qing, the Romanovs, the Ottomans and the Qajar, various empires incarnated these very old, common to all, and permanently cherished ideals in their respective locations. And by entering in endless commercial, cultural and spiritual exchanges, the great realms of Afro-Asia gave new dynamics to the magnificent soar made by the original civilizations that started in the beginning of the 4th millennium BCE in Mesopotamia (美索不达米亚/ بین النهرین) and Egypt. And the Silk-, Spice- and Frankincense Routes across Lands, Deserts and Seas, which are commonly called ‘the Silk Roads’, demonstrated very well the supreme human value, i.e. the Unity of Earth Life, removing in reality all the frontiers across the main landmass where the Mankind dwells. About:
Starting with the late 15th and early 16th c., mankind was hit with an unprecedented plague that originated from a minor and insignificant peninsula, which had never been viewed as the center of a civilization or the location of a meritable kingdom by any civilized nation: Europe. I mainly refer to the current territories of Portugal, Spain, France, Holland, Belgium and England. These lands alone represent nowadays the historical meaning of what people define as “Europe” today.
I. Europe is not a Continent
There is a troublesome hiatus in this regard, and it is necessary to make things clear. When people across the world think today of ‘Europe’ as a so-called continent (‘from the Atlantic to the Urals’), they only demonstrate to what great extent they have been deceived by the propaganda that emanated from the aforementioned modern states. This delusion of a ‘Europe – Continent’ does not exist in History; it’s a fake. The inhuman means of its propagation do not concern the scope of the present article, but surely involve the education, the publications, the mass media, the psychological operations (psy-ops), the so-called ‘political life’ (a low level farcical act), and the pseudo-culture that these states imposed at home and abroad.
Throughout the ages, Europe was never viewed as a ‘continent’ (in the sense we mean now); it did not actually consist in a continent, and -even worse- it was not the land of a civilization that impacted World History. Europe did not represent a unity of culture, tradition, faith, ancestry or language in any sense. In reality, all the useless elements of Asia and Africa ended up in Europe one way or another. And more tragi-comically for the well-propagated Fake History of Europe, the few civilized elements of Asia and Africa, which generated a rudimentary civilization on what is now called ‘European soil’ (Cyprus, Crete, Rome, Macedonia), did so by merely reproducing Asiatic and African values, arts, traditions, concepts and techniques and by bringing with them forms of spirituality, faith, moral, piety and virtue that were typically African or Asiatic in their original form.
What puts European colonials’ pseudo-historical propaganda beyond all intents and purposes is the fact that the very few civilized kingdoms, which were formed on what is now called ‘Europe’ did not identify themselves as ‘European’, did not view ‘Europe’ as a cultural unity or imperial entity, and did not care for the largest part of what we now call Europe, because simply it was worthless to them.
Alexander the Great of Macedonia, the absolute embodiment of Anti-Greek or Anti-Hellenic ruler, deployed enormous effort to succeed to the Achaemenid rulers of Iran. He was not the invader of many lands, as the modern European pseudo-historical propaganda projects him to be; he only conquered the entire Achaemenid Iran because he wanted to be an Asiatic king of kings. That’s why he deliberately made of Babylon his capital and of the Sogdian princess Roxanne his wife. But the central and northern part of the Balkan Peninsula, which would be easy to conquer, fully disinterested him. And the same is also valid for Southern Italy and Sicily where Ionians and Dorians had established colonies, let alone the useless plains of Gaul and the plateau of the Iberian Peninsula.
Achaemenid Iran
And the Roman Emperors repeatedly and convincingly proved that to them Egypt was more important than Gaul, Anatolia was more worthwhile than Iberia, and Syria was more significant than Britain. Romans undertook a naval expedition against Arabia Felix (today’s Aden), but not around the otherwise useless coasts of Sweden, Norway and Finland. Optimus princeps Trajan (98-117; 圖拉真/ تراژان), the greatest Roman emperor of all times, carried out military expeditions down to Characene (today’s southern Iraq and Kuwait) and up to Caucasus Albania (today’s Azerbaijan), but he did not have the slightest concern about the shores of today’s Poland and Estonia or the Azov Sea and the plains of Ukraine. Even more exemplarily, not one Roman Emperor bothered to invade Hibernia, today’s Ireland. About:
Through conquests and treaties, the Romans controlled in Africa a definitely larger territory than in Europe, but today’s forged maps are systematically produced in a way to scrupulously conceal this historical reality. Even worse, scholarly Orientalist bibliography is kept far from the hands of the average public (and therefore not duly popularized in education manuals, publishing houses, and the mass media) in order not to reveal the overwhelming and cataclysmic diffusion of Oriental cults, concepts, virtues, values, lifestyles, faiths, esoteric rites, mythologies, worldviews, religions, arts, symbolisms, cosmogonies, cosmologies, systems of eschatology and messianic soteriology, rites, ceremonials, forms of spirituality, wisdom and erudition across all European territories of the Roman Empire, and also in other lands in Europe. Quite contrarily to the pseudo-historical dogma that the European colonial intellectuals produced by fallaciously naming an entire period ‘Hellenistic and Roman Times’, this same period is indeed ‘Orientalist and Orientalizing Times’, due to the above mentioned prevalence of Oriental cultures and civilizations throughout Europe.
II. Colonial Gangsters, Division of the World, and the East-West Divide
A fake concept for Europe and a bogus-historical dogma were not the only calamities with which the European kingdoms affected the rest of the world; in fact, they were only two and among the last. The six colonial kingdoms used their military edge to inflict great empires and primitive structures with all sorts of disaster, destruction, ruin, death, and unadulterated inhumanity. Settler colonialism and intellectual-spiritual-cultural-intellectual-educational-academic-religious colonialism started with the evil treaty of Tordesillas (1494; پیمان تردسییاس /托德西利亚斯条约) and they soon attained unprecedented levels of monstrosity with the evil deeds of the Spanish and the Portuguese conquistadors. The Spanish conquest of the Aztec Empire (1519-1521; فتح امپراتوری آزتک توسط اسپانیا /西班牙征服阿兹特克帝国) before exactly 500 years and the destruction of the highly civilized Aztec capital Tenochtitlan (特诺奇蒂特兰/ تنوختیتلان) only heralded what would follow. About:
The division of the seas as per the Treaty of Tordesillas (1494)
In the beginning of the 16th c., when such terribly inhuman crimes started being perpetrated by the first colonial empires, namely Spain and Portugal, there were still several human empires on Earth: in 1520, the Ottoman Empire covered a sizable territory in Western Asia, Northeastern Africa, and what is now called Southeastern Europe. In Western Africa, the Mali Empire (Manden Kurufaba) was still powerful, although superseded by the Songhai Empire.
In Iran, the Safavids were in power, controlling vast lands from Central Iraq to Herat to Baluchistan. The formidable Turanian-Mongolian Empire of the Golden Horde had split, but from today’s NE Balkans and Poland to the Pacific Ocean, a number of Muslim, Buddhist and Tengrist Turanian-Mongolian khanates controlled a really enormous territory. You needed only to speak Chagatay Turkic to cross (from west to east) the vast lands of the Qasim Khanate, the Crimean Khanate, the Nogai Horde, the Khanate of Kazan, the Astrakhan Khanate, the Uzbek Khanate, the Kazakh Khanate, the Khanate of Sibir (Siberia), the Turpan Khanate, the Yarkand Khanate, and the Four Oirat confederacy. In China, the Ming dynasty was still powerful, and in 1526, Timur’s (Tamerlane’s) great-great grandson Babur took power in Delhi, eliminating the earlier sultanates and founding the formidable Gurkanian Empire of South Asia, which is better known as the Mughal Empire.
The Golden Horde (Turanian-Mongolian Empire)The divided Turanian-Mongolian Empire around 1500The Ottomans around 1520The Safavid Empire of Iran around 1520 which according to Western colonial propaganda was called ‘Persia’, although it was a Turanian Empire.The Mughal Empire of South AsiaThe Songhai Empire in the 15-16th c.
However, none of these empires’ human elites had an idea about the monstrous plans and the atrocious deeds of the then otherwise insignificant colonial barbarians, who aspired to conquer and disfigure the entire world through evil conspiracy, deceitful schemes, pernicious practices, and utterly inhuman deeds. The naivety of the Ottoman, Safavid, Mughal, and Ming emperors hinges on the fact that they did not studiously monitor the deeds of the colonial powers; furthermore, they mistook the European colonials for humans, and they did not make proper plans as to how to oppose them. The worst mistake of the great Asiatic and African empires was that they did not perceive the forthcoming encounter and clash in terms of long-term perspective, eschatological agenda, and human race extinction. Still, all these empires cherished traditions and beliefs that described the ‘evil’ extensively; but the Asiatic imperial elites failed to timely identify the European colonials as the evil par excellence.
Hitherto unconceivable concepts were then introduced, and the fallacious version of History, peremptorily produced by the European colonial elites, was instrumental in projecting onto the entire world the aberration of a division between East and West (or Orient and Occident). This forgery had a double headed axe’s use:
a) it made the colonial elites, academics, diplomats, administrators, army officers, soldiers, societies and average people in general utterly believe in their ‘proven’ superiority (whereas they are indeed multiply inferior, degenerate and inhuman), and
b) it convinced the targeted nations’ elites, academics, diplomats, administrators, army officers, soldiers, societies and average people in general that they were irrevocably inferior (whereas they are indeed superior, law-abiding and human in every sense).
III. Colonial Weaponization of Knowledge and Deceitful Schemes against the Entire Mankind (1494-1925)
None of the 16th c. great imperial establishments of Asia and Africa realized the extent of the colonial perversion, subversion and systematic falsification of the World History. Study, research, exploration, knowledge, erudition and wisdom were traits, activities, qualities and virtues invariably attested throughout millennia in Asia and Africa; however, the entire scope and the final target were always the same, namely the discovery of the truth and the improvement of understanding. There was never a claim of superiority and such an attitude or claim would appear as absurd; there was competition and quite often synergy.
All the intellectuals of Ionia, Attica, Aeolia and Macedonia willingly acknowledged that they went to Mesopotamia, Egypt and Iran to be educated in the vast temples- universities of the Oriental capitals, because there was only darkness in the multi-divided and backward, petty states of South Balkans. Scholars from all backgrounds and lands used to flock to Nineveh, to Babylon, to Iwnw (Heliopolis), and to Persepolis, and later to Alexandria, to Antioch, to Nisibis, to Ctesiphon, to Istakhr, to Gundishapur, and during Islamic times to Baghdad, to Cordoba, to Cairo, and to Samarqand without idiotic prejudices of ethnic or national, ancestral or racial superiority.
However, the weaponization of knowledge, as attested in magnificent colonial grand opuses like the famous Dutch “Hortus Malabaricus” (1669-1676) and the illustrious French “La Description de l’Égypte” (1809-1829), showed that the insidious European colonial adventure was not a simple military expedition, an economic exploitation, and a national enslavement, but it consisted in the total deprivation of the colonized nations from their natural and national resources, their urban and architectural environment, their traditional knowledge and cultural heritage, and their own identity.
La Description de l’Égypte – the cover page of the monumental voluminous publication
Even worse, the European colonial plague constituted a systematic and permanent projection of the false identity of subaltern and subservient humanoid onto all the civilized Asiatic and African humans; they had been civilized, but they were forced into abandoning their culture and civilization, into being barbarized and enslaved, and into being transformed into humanoid automatons to serve their barbarian masters, i.e. the inhuman monsters of Portugal, Spain, England, France, Holland and Belgium. European colonialism was therefore the complete, irreversible and ultimate dehumanization of the ‘Other’. In the History of Mankind, we can describe European colonialism as the Crime of Crimes.
Simply, in the case of Luso-Spanish, Dutch, and Anglo-French colonialism, the ‘Other’ was the entire world, and the vicious gangsters and forgers were the most worthless barbarians of Asia’s westernmost and most uncivilized peninsula. The result of the detrimental shock was evident: the Mughal Empire could not last more than 180 years after the publication of the “Hortus Malabaricus”, and the Ottoman Empire ceased to exist less than 100 years after the publication of the “Description de l’Égypte”. The morale of the story is easy to figure out: when the foreigners know ‘your’ possessions better than you do, you better ask the astrologers how much time is left before your state disappears.
The French colonial empireThe English colonial empire
This is so because, if foreigners know ‘your’ possessions better than you do, this means that your state is already useless and dysfunctional. It also means that your religion is apparently worthless and your sacred texts evidently valueless; and this is true, not in the sense that the religion and the sacred texts in question are meritless, but because you lost their true meaning and therefore your understanding of them is nil.
IV. Naivety and Subsequent Fall of the Oriental Imperial Elites: Mughal Empire, Qing China, Czarist Russia, the Ottomans & Qajar Iran
It is interesting that the Opium Wars started only few years before the Mughal Empire disappeared. In 1839, the power of Bahadur Shah II was not greater than that of a puppet king in the Balkans or a tribal leader in Sub-Saharan Africa. Cornered among the Ottomans, the Russians, the English in ‘India’, and the English puppets in the pseudo-state of Afghanistan, the Iranian Qajar shahs could do nothing either to help the Chinese Qing or to organize their own defense with the much demanded final dissolution of Afghanistan and with an attack against British India.
It was too late for them; or perhaps one could say that for Imperial Iran, it was already too late in 1501, when the young shah Ismail Safavi, almost adored as the Messiah/Mahdi Incarnate in his early years, was spending his nights in fabulous banquets and sexual orgies, while the Luso-Spanish armadas were sailing across all oceans, which were literally prohibited to all Muslims, Chinese and the rest by virtue of the Treaty of Tordesillas of which no Iranian intelligence ever heard anything before the 20th c.
Ismail Safavi
Under such circumstances, no one has a doubt why Fat′h-Ali Shah Qajar (reign: 1797-1834) did nothing else except losing one more war to the Russians and spending his long days and his even longer nights with his 1000+ concubines, thus laboriously producing no less than 100 children and ca. 600 grandchildren (although several trustworthy historical sources include even higher numbers of heirs). The same is valid for the pious but stupid Ottomans whose best way of correcting a mistake was to commit another.
Fat′h-Ali Shah Qajar
And what is the difference between the last Mughal (Bahadur Shah II) and the last Ottoman (Vahdettin)? Having got a kick in the ass, the former died (1862) in Rangoon (Myanmar) where he was exiled; having experienced the same miserable fate, the latter died in exile (1926), in Sanremo (Italy); either in the East or in the West, an exile is an exile. It is therefore a permanent shame and an irrevocable disgrace. No one can raise a claim to Neo-Safavism, Neo-Mughalism or Neo-Ottomanism without being similarly destroyed and eradicated from the surface of the Earth. And quite instructively, today’s China does not play into the Neo-Qing game; neither does Republican Russia develop Neo-Czarist delusions.
Bahadur Shah II, the powerless Mughal emperor when he was still on his throneThe exiled Bahadur Shah II in his small cabinVahdettin, the most execrable and the most miserable of all Ottomans leaves his palace to sail on an English ship to Italy where he lived in exile for the last years of his shameful life
The Opium Wars did not signal only the beginning of the European-American-Japanese colonization of China; they also heralded the beginning of the end for the Romanov. Yet, it was a period of stability for Russia – or so it seemed. From 1825 until 1881, when Alexander II was assassinated at the age of 63, Russia was ruled by only two czars, namely Nicholas I and his son. But there was no foresight, no real study of the European colonials, and no identity clarity.
The Zionist assassination of the Freemason czar Alexander IIRussia’s most shameful spot: the room where Nicholas II and his family were assassinated, thus paying for the mistake to associate Holy Russia to the unholy and devilish colonial states of France and England. Russia’s and the Romanov dynasty’s destiny would be different, if Nicholas II became the ally of Germany and Austria-Hungary and liberated India from the English colonial contamination.
Few people understand that only identity clarity can offer success in the governance of a realm and in the status it rejoices at the international level; on the contrary, identity confusion leads mathematically to defeat and destruction. Imperial Russia was in fact a Western European colonial fabrication – not by means of military invasion but by virtue of colonial stratagems. Colonial investors, agents and diplomats bribed, corrupted and utilized Russian noblemen and royals, and through subtle machinations convinced the Romanovs that they were a ‘European’ power. Thus, the Anglo-French colonials pulled the Russians into their historical forgery, persuaded them that the ‘Russians’ were ‘Indo-Europeans’, dragged them into the fallacious scheme ‘Christianity vs. Islam’ (whereas the English, the Dutch and the French elites were virulently anti-Christian), and engaged them in the same colonial competition (not anymore “Scramble for Africa” but for the entire world). However, all these developments were calamitous for Russia, and finally they led only to the demise of the entire dynasty.
The Russians were subtly made to believe that the ‘common’ enemy that they had with the English and the French was the Islamic World; this was a success of the Anglo-French colonial diplomacy. In fact, the Russians had much in common with the Muslims, whereas they had nothing in common with the Anglo-French colonial contamination.The Opium Wars: one of the worst shames of the History of MankindPu Yi, the last of the Qing emperors
As a virtually Turanian, Asiatic and Oriental superpower (like the Golden Horde), Russia had to support China in the Opium Wars, by making an alliance with Iran and by attacking Afghanistan and invading British India. But when you are an Asiatic and you think you are a European, you cannot possibly opt for the correct decision. That’s why identity clarity matters above all, when it comes to national survival. Identity recognition is a very serious and at times painful process; usually, you are neither what you think (are taught that) you are, nor what you would like to be. Only a very neutral and objective/objectivist standpoint toward past atrocities and a strict detachment from national/nationalist/nationalistic narratives, present dreams, and wishful thinking can offer you the key to your identity.
Similarly, during WW I, Russia had to be the ally of Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire, Japan and Iran against France and England. In such a case, having no apparent reason to keep significant military forces in their western borders, the Russians could support the Ottomans against the English in Mesopotamia, Palestine and Hejaz, while three (3) million Russian soldiers with their Iranian allies could eliminate the fake state of Afghanistan and march on Delhi, invading the English colony and controlling the southern parts of Asia.
States function like human beings; the same rules apply to an individual and to a group of individuals. When someone does not do the correct thing, a mishappening takes always place. Wrong choices are constantly met with disastrous results; It was very unfortunate that the Russians participated with France and England in the vicious dismemberment of Qing China and that, in 1858-1860, through several ‘unequal treaties’ (the expression is an acknowledged historical term), they detached Outer Manchuria (外滿洲 / Приамурье). That’s why less than 60 years after Alexander II did this injustice to China, his grandson Nicholas II was deposed and assassinated. Alexander II was assassinated too (1881); but after his tragic death, Holy Russia still continued to exist. However, after his grandson’s assassination (1918), Holy Russia was no more. The ‘holy’ had been progressively but completely desecrated through the alliance with England and France.
V. Intellectual Colonialism and Orientalism
While the intellectual elites of the European colonial powers composed their false historical dogma on the basis of the intellectual-academic-cultural movements that we now call ‘Renaissance’, ‘Classicism’, and ‘Enlightenment’, arbitrarily distorting the past of their own lands, they also misinterpreted the History of Ancient Rome and the Roman Empire that they –also deliberately and erroneously- associated with them; it was a real usurpation of another nation’s past and cultural heritage. Then, peremptorily selecting earlier rejected philosophers of Ionia, worthless and forgotten politicians of Attica, long dismissed Aeolian poets, self-styled historians of Carian origin, authors of obscure past and unknown ancestry, repudiated tragedians and duly banished comedians, as well as forms of decayed lifestyle involving pedophilia and homosexuality, ritualistic orgies, and other absolutely pathetic and barbarian practices and traditions of various South Balkan tribes, they fabricated -out of thin air- what we now call ‘Ancient Greece’.
Ancient Greece never existed as a historical entity in the sense Ancient Phoenicia did. The royal divisions of the Ancient Phoenicians did not impact their culture and values that are now recognized for their coherence, consistency and uniformity. Quite contrarily, the disparate cultural elements that appear in the historical sources, the divergent religious beliefs and faithless lifestyles that are documented by means of archaeological evidence, and the incessant conflicts that pitched one ‘Ancient Greek’ city against another bear witness to the undeniable reality that ‘Ancient Greece’ never existed. In case, during the Antiquity and the Christian Times, the name had only a geographical connotation. In Islamic Times, it was duly forgotten. It is one more colonial fabrication (just like the European ‘Continent’!) geared to be an element of destructive propaganda and a double headed axe. This is what we now call ‘Hellenism’, i.e. a racist ghost.
Hitherto unconceivable concepts were then introduced, and the fallacious version of History, peremptorily produced by the European colonial elites, was instrumental in projecting onto the entire world the aberration of a division between East and West as per which
a) all the positive values, virtues, elements, contributions and exploits were delivered by the Ancient Greeks and Romans (the so-called ‘West’),
whereas
b) all the negative values, sins, disorders, embarrassments, and shames were caused by all the Ancient Oriental nations, the Eastern Christians of all denominations (Orthodox, Miaphysitic/Monophysitic, and Nestorian), and all the Muslims (the so-called ‘East’).
It goes without saying that the latter (b) were (or rather ‘had to be’) ‘lower’ than the former (a)!!
To add insult to injury, the colonial academic elites turned their intellectual and scientific robbery of the colonized nations’ natural and national resources, urban and architectural environment, traditional knowledge, cultural heritage, and diachronic identity into an unprecedentedly enormous academic fallacy. Colonial explorers, epigraphists, linguists, archaeologists, philologists and historians deciphered dozens of ancient scripts, surveyed and excavated dozens of thousands of archaeological sites, penned millions of speeches, articles, manuals and books, and filled thousands of libraries and museums with an enormous documentation which consists basically in a calamitous, venomous and discriminatory misrepresentation of the historical past of Asia and Africa. This enormous falsehood is now called Orientalism. All the discoveries, analyses, syntheses, conclusions and interpretations of the colonial Orientalist scholars were published and popularized only in a way to preserve the earlier constituted pseudo-historical dogma intact; this means automatically that vast part of the said documentation was concealed far from the average public.
There are many deliberately erroneous aspects of Orientalism; it goes beyond the scope of the present article to refute the atrocities of the Western colonial Orientalists. However, I must herewith mention a persistent and critical dimension of historical falsification that concerns the use of the forged World History that the Western colonials make.
When you initially write and teach a ‘World History’, based on historical sources that cover the period 500 BCE – 1500 CE and then, at a later stage, you discover numerous anterior sources, which reveal to you (with respect to the outright majority of the world’s historical nations) diverse aspects of spiritual exploration, intellectual endeavor, scientific research, cultural life, artistic genius, economic activity, state governance, public administration, military expedition, imperial conceptualization, and interstate relations that cover 2-3 millennia of History (which antedate the period you initially knew about), then you have to amend all your earlier criteria, preconceived ideas, measures of evaluation, moral standards, virtues, world views, concepts, and standpoints, values, theories, ideas, assumptions and conclusions, because they are -most probably- entirely wrong.
When you discover millions of texts in several languages and you get a clear idea of how life was 2000 or 3000 years before the moment you -arbitrarily and due to lack of sources- had taken as the ‘beginning of History’, then everything that you ‘knew’ (before the astounding discovery and the subsequent enrichment of knowledge) is wiped out, obliterated, and considered as obsolete once forever.
If we eventually suppose that the peremptory aberrations and the arbitrary conceptualizations of the Renaissance European colonial intellectuals were not malignant schemes providing only for the enslavement of the entire Mankind but mere errors and erroneous assumptions, then we can safely conclude that all these earlier aberrations and conceptualizations had to be immediately, completely and adequately amended in the light of the enormous amount of evidence unearthed, deciphered, studied, analyzed and interpreted.
Enuma Elish, the ancient Assyrian-Babylonian holy text that consists in the first human narrative of the Creation. After the discovery, decipherment, publication and study of the world’s earliest myths, epics and holy texts, everything changes, and we cannot afford to use posterior criteria to evaluate earlier masterpieces of spirituality and literature. On the contrary, all earlier, Assyrian-Babylonian and Egyptian, cultural and spiritual criteria apply to the evaluation of posterior epics and holy texts, notably those of the Hebrews, the ‘Greeks’ and the Romans. The Hawara papyrus with text of Homer’s Iliad. After the decipherment, study and publication of Ancient Assyrian-Babylonian, Egyptian and Hittite holy texts, myths and epics, the only value that Homer’s epics can possibly have is the one that the Ancient Assyrian-Babylonian, Egyptian and Hittite criteria allow us to assess.
The fact that this development did not happen at all and the evident practice that today’s West European and North American colonial academics and intellectuals continue diffusing the same, preconceived and widely imposed falsehood are enough to convince all persons of good intentions that the European pseudo-historical dogma has always been deliberately and inanely false from A to Z.
VI. The Fake Science of Geopolitics
Since the misrepresentation of the ‘Other’ reached such extent, it was normal for the colonial elites to develop additional nonsensical theories, which were laboriously portrayed as ‘scientific disciplines’. In fact, they were merely wishful thinking defense mechanisms that lacked historicity, objectivity, authenticity, veracity and congruity; in brief, they were tools of propaganda and means to fool the eye. One of these arbitrary schemes is what people now call ‘geopolitics’. There is no geopolitics in any sense, and there can’t be any; the term is totally meaningless and self-contradictory.
Coined by the Swedish political scientist and politician Rudolf Kjellén (1864-1922), the term ‘Geopolitics’ (initially Geopolitik in Swedish and German) contains two linguistic elements in striking contradiction to one another. Being composed of two Ancient Greek words (γη+πολιτική/ge+politiki) that mean ‘earth’ (or ‘land’) and ‘politics’, the term was geared to purportedly describe “the study of the effects of Earth’s geography (human and physical) on politics and international relations”.
This assumption raises many points; first, ‘earth’ (γη) is not ‘geography’; second, ‘geography’ (lit. description of the earth) was already an ancient science that the Ancient Greeks and Romans learned from the Babylonians, the Phoenicians, the Egyptians and other ancient and highly civilized nations. Modern geography is a scientific discipline dedicated “to the study of the lands, features, inhabitants, and phenomena of the Earth and planets”, but Modern Geography and Ancient Geography are two completely different disciplines, methods, concepts and endeavors. This is still preliminary.
The main problem of the term ‘Geopolitics’ (‘earth’ and ‘politics’) is precisely that the Earth (or land) is unrelated to politics, and actually no politics can possibly apply to the Earth or most of the surface of the Earth. ‘Politics’ constitutes a very specific and historically marginal system of governance that can concern only a city-state (polis). There is no ‘politics’ in an empire, a kingdom, a nomad confederation, and a sizable realm of any racial, ethnic, linguistic, cultural and spiritual background. There was no ‘politics’ in Ancient Egypt, Akkad, Assyria, Babylonia, Hittite Anatolia, Cush (Ancient Sudan), Carthage, Iran, Yemen, Turan, and China. There was no ‘politics’ in any Balkan or Anatolian kingdom; and there was no ‘politics’ in Seleucid Syria, Attalid Pergamum, Bactria, Sogdia or Kushan.
Jean-Baptiste Regnault, Alcibiades taken by Socrates. Politics can exist in a small city-state with no hereditary rule. However, a major state, let alone an empire, cannot be ruled by means of politics. As it is only the result of negotiations, material compromises, desecrated social life, corruption and impiety, politics is an improper, immoral and calamitous system even for the unfortunate cities-states that happen to be organized in this manner. But Western Europeans could not possibly understand this reality, because they had disastrously idealized the misery of Ancient Athens, one of the world’s most disreputable states.
Ancient Rome offers a good example in this regard; there was no politics in the Kingdom of Rome (Regnum Romanum; 753–509 BCE); there was politics in the Roman Republic (Senatus Populusque Romanus; 509-27 BCE); and there was no more politics in the Roman Empire (Imperium Romanum; 27 BCE-476 CE).
Subsequently, there was no ‘politics’ in the Eastern Roman Empire, in the Sassanid Empire of Iran, in the Gupta Empire, in Han, Tang, Yuan or Ming China, in the Islamic caliphates, sultanates, emirates, and khanates, in the Christian kingdoms of Western Europe or in any other nomadic confederation, realm or dominion. No system of governance can possibly be called ‘politics’ except for the republican administration of a city-state with democratic participation in the rule.
Certainly, the currently prevailing confusion makes everyone imagine that politics means governance and vice versa, but this represents only one more aspect of the multifaceted colonial propaganda that was diffused worldwide during the 19th and the 20th c. Useless to add, for any sizable realm larger than a modest self-governed city, there is no ‘politics’ today; the system is a tyranny disguised as ‘republic’ or ‘democracy’ and there cannot be any comparison between today’s fake politics and Ancient Roman or Athenian politics, except in terms of corruption, evil character, pernicious attitude, and social disorder.
So, to return to the initial point, “the effects of Earth’s geography (human and physical) on politics and international relations” (as per another definition of the fake term) should be rather called “geo-imperium”, “geo-tyranny”, “geo-dictatum” or “geo-control”; perhaps the best term would be “geo-sovereignty”. This is also proven by the deplorable contents that all the Western colonial academics, intelligence and military experts, diplomats and intellectuals invariably gave to the fake term ‘geo-politics’. Suffice it that one studies these ‘contents’ to realize that ‘geo-politics’ is an ahistorical mixture of criminal colonial targets with incessant distortions of the historical past. It has nothing to do with the ‘governance of one city with non-hereditary rule.
Alfred Thayer Mahan (1840–1914) came up with a debased theory, as per which the Ottoman Empire, Qajar Iran, Qing China, Japan, and the colonial pseudo-state of Afghanistan were facing existential threats from the so-called ‘two monsters’, namely England and Russia. This nonsense can only be the invention of a cruel American pro-French/pro-Republican colonial, who felt that -despite France’s disproportionate control of African lands- Paris did not play an important role in the so-called ‘Big Game’ between Russia and England. Had the Vietnamese Nguyen dynasty survived the French colonial onslaught, Mahan would surely have invented a much larger ‘zone of threatened realms’ (probably between the 10th and the 40th parallels north, not only between the 30th and the 40th parallels north)! He presented himself as a Christian, but he was a Biblical racist and therefore a pseudo-Christian.
Until today, Halford Mackinder (1861-1947) is viewed as the principal heresiarch of the geo-political fallacy. All that he did was to draw fake lines, which did not represent historical realities in any sense. His long celebrated ‘The Geographical Pivot of History’ (1904) reflected the harsh antagonism of German, Russian and English scholars and explorers in parts of today’s Central Asia and Western China. Many people read this book, but do not know that it was written immediately after the first expedition (1900-1901) of Sir Marc Aurel Stein (1862-1943) in Central Asia, during which the Hungarian Jewish-English explorer and British Intelligence officer carried out surface surveys, extensive reconnaissance, and excavations at Dandan Oilik, an oasis of the Taklamakan Desert. Mackinder’s book was published only months after Aurel Stein’s ‘Sand-Buried Ruins of Khotan Personal Narrative of a Journey of Archaeological & Geographical Exploration in Chinese Turkestan’ (1903).
Mackinder’s texts reflect colonial concepts, diplomatic efforts, and Orientalist terms and explorations; at the time, Aurel Stein was still using currently obsolete terms like ‘Serindia’ (China, Indochina and India viewed as an entity) and ‘Innermost Asia’ (Central Asia, Western China, Mongolia, Central and Eastern Siberia) because his time was a period of pioneering research in those territories that had not been visited by Western European colonials until then. At those days, colonial Orientalists had already gathered enough evidence to fully document the History of Turan and to understand how internal Turanian (Turkic and Mongolian) conflicts generated endless historical waves of immigrants either to the South (in today’s China) or to the West (in today’s Central Siberia, Central Asia, Iran, Western Siberia, Eastern and Central Europe). This reality is hidden behind Mackinder’s concept of ‘pivot’ that he defined as the central point in his otherwise nonexistent ‘World-island’. However, his pivot area was not historically pivotal. Worse, it never existed as a geo-historical entity!
Even if we take the Afanasievo culture (3300=2500 BCE; in the Altai Mountains) and the Andronovo culture (2000-900 BCE; north of the Aral Lake) as signs of early and successive migratory waves, we cannot afford to define today’s NE Siberia, Central Siberia, Central Asia, and Iran’s northern and central parts as the real geographical ‘pivot’ of History. Quite contrarily, pivotal for the World History was the so-called ‘Fertile Crescent’ – another pseudo-historical term that denotes Mesopotamia, Syro-Palestine and Egypt. It is from there that civilization spread to the rest of the world. But in 1904, these regions were controlled by the Ottomans (Mesopotamia and Syro-Palestine) and the Anglo-French colonials (Egypt), and there was not much at stake. Contrarily, in the lands that Mackinder described as ‘pivot’, the possible limits of a) the German involvement, b) the English infiltration, c) the Russian advance, and d) the Chinese presence were unknown, whereas all borders were essentially ill-defined.
Last, Mackinder’s tripartite division of the world {into World-Island, offshore islands (England and Japan), and outlying islands (America and Oceania)} is nonsensical either at the historical or the geographical level. Why didn’t he include Indonesia? Probably because it was already colonized by the Dutch and nothing was at stake there. Inane!
On the other hand, Karl Haushofer (1869-1946) produced a geopolitical system that reflected many historical concepts and approaches to imperial governance. In strong contrast with Mackinder’s bizarre abstractions and ahistorical maps, Haushofer’s ideas appear sound and solid. But they are not … ‘geopolitical’! They represent merely a traditional imperial worldview, and they constitute the basics of the state prosperity and expansion as documented in 18th dynasty Kemet (Egypt), Sargonid Assyria, Achaemenid or Sassanid Iran, Han or Tang China, the Abbasid caliphate, and the Timurid Empire.
As a matter of fact, there is nothing ‘new’ or ‘modern’ in Haushofer’s ideas; they are correct, but they constitute the antipodes of the colonial nonsense that we nowadays call ‘geo-politics’. I simply wonder why the distinguished German scholar did not have the courage to decry ‘geo-politics’ as a fake science and to portray the Anglo-Saxon colonial paranoia as the supreme danger for the Mankind’s survival.
The notion of the organic state, the theory of Lebensraum, the need for self-sufficiency-self-reliance (autarky), and the division of the world into spheres of influence or distinct realms (pan-regions) can be found in cuneiform, hieroglyphic, Chinese, Middle Persian, Arabic and Farsi historical sources – millennia before Haushofer put them down on a piece of paper. But they were not described as ‘geopolitical notions’; they were viewed as basics of imperial governance. The only element that did not exist during the Antiquity and the Christian-Islamic times is the delusion of dichotomy between land power and sea power. But in this, Haushofer was apparently influenced by those whom he had to firmly oppose but failed to do so: his Anglo-Saxon opponents.
As it could be expected, on the earlier basis of ahistorical sketches and arbitrary aberrations, further fallacies and false notions were progressively added. Nicholas Spykman (1893-1943) expanded the erroneous concept as per which today’s NE Siberia, Central Siberia, Central Asia, and Iran’s northern and central parts are the ‘pivotal’ area. He then peremptorily and therefore erroneously divided the Afro-Asiatic landmass into a) the so-called ‘heartland’ and b) the ‘rimland’. These jolly delusions never existed in the History of Mankind; they actually do not consist in any worthwhile synthesis or serious interpretation of the existing historical sources. They only reflect the Anglo-Saxon regimes’ final goals, and the evil methods that they intend to use in order to achieve them; in other words, one can surely describe them as ‘wishful thinking’ and properly decry them as the most serious threat against the entire Mankind.
Fake lines, fake borders, fake concepts and fake science: geo-politics
Before ending this unit, I feel obliged to shift the discussion from the false and fake ‘geo-politics’ to the true and genuine ‘geographical determinism’. When it comes to topics pertaining to the Earth’s impact on empires, peoples and cultures, one has to point out that these topics did not come to surface only in Modern Times; they have constituted an integral part of all the major civilizations of World History. They were known as part of the ancient wisdom, knowledge and sciences; and this was already known to Orientalists, historians and philologists. This knowledge we presently define as ‘geographical determinism’.
Ancient erudite scholars, high priests, mystics and explorers always viewed the material universe as hinging on the spiritual universe; consequently, they were adamant in identifying concordances between the two entities. Part of their scientific knowledge and understanding depended on their spiritual wisdom and exploration. Among the scientific disciplines that they developed and which they viewed as an undividable unity of spiritual and material knowledge and wisdom, ‘geographical determinism’ was only one.
Geographical determinism was not only a concept and a theory, but a practice and a set of criteria as to how to live in Ancient Assyria, Babylon, Egypt, Hittite Anatolia, Elam, Cush, Canaan-Phoenicia, and Iran. The same is valid for Carthage, Yemen, the Indus Valley, Turan, and China. The choice of dwelling places, the urban plans, the construction of temples and palaces, the orientation of cities, the identification of sacred sites, the direction of prayer, the selection of specific locations for rock reliefs and inscriptions, the recognition of the correct spots to place enormous statues, pillars and obelisks, altars and thrones, in one word everything, depended on the conclusions drawn after a deep study of geographical determinism.
NinevehEtemenanki, the world’s holiest location as per the BabyloniansIshtar’s Gate, Babylon – Berlin MuseumParsa (Persepolis), the Achaemenid capital of Iran. Not only the selection of major sites (for palaces and temples) but also the minor details of a society’s daily life were arranged on the basis of geographical determinism.
In fact, the interconnection of the spiritual and material universes is the sole factor that denotes and specifies the nature and the traits of every single geographical point, therefore revealing its uniqueness, importance and possible use. High priests, mystics and hierophants were able to duly explore and describe the locally particular interaction of the five elements (i.e. Ether, Soft Waters, Earth, Air, and Salt Waters) and the subsequent generation of electromagnetic flow per point. This is how they concluded as regards the eventual use of the geographical point, ground, space or area.
It matters little whether you delve in Assyrian-Babylonian, Egyptian and Iranian Cosmogony and Spiritual Ontology (see above, as regards the five elements) or you explore the Traditional Chinese Wuxin (五行) Ontology, as per which the five elements are the following: Metal (initially conceived as Gold and corresponding to Ether), Water (evidently conceived as Soft Waters), Earth, Wood (corresponding to Air) and Fire. The conclusions were always identical. At the end of the day, either you were at the banks of Tigris, Euphrates, Nile, Huang-he (黃河/Yellow River) or Chang Jiang (黃河/Yangtze), geographical determinism functioned always as (to use a modern term) a fully accredited ‘urban environmental acupuncture’.
Traditional Chinese Wuxin (五行) Ontology
The ‘woke’ attitude to transfigure the term and turn ‘geographical determinism’ into ‘environmental determinism’ reveals only the ignorance and the paranoia of the corrupt left-wing social-justice movements and ideologies that currently exist in the worthless and already defunct Western world. This is so, because ‘geography’ meant always the study of the environment (not only the earth) in historical periods.
VII. From the Great Game to the Final Game
European colonial powers’ expansion brought destruction, barbarism, pandemics, wars, deaths, misery, poverty, inhumanity, demolition of cultures, and deracination of millions of people. European colonialism caused also two world wars and a 44-year long ‘cold war’. For these nefarious results and for all the crimes perpetrated, the European colonial states (Portugal, Spain, France, Holland, Belgium, and England) and their derivatives (USA, Canada, and Australia) will have to pay dearly for their attempt to annihilate so many historical nations, destroy their traditions, and uproot their cultures.
Quite unfortunately, the Western colonial and neo-colonial powers did not regret and did not repent for the calamitous and inhuman deeds that they carried out worldwide. There is a serious reason for this grave mistake and unacceptable attitude; the unrepentant savages of US, UK, NATO and their allies are controlled by forces that push the world to the edge, as they advance in the implementation of an eschatological agenda that provides for the extermination of more than nine tenths of the current world’s population. If this claim appears farfetched, one has only to read the text of the magnificent monument known as the Georgia Guidestones; it will be enough.
The persistent manner by which the ruling classes of the colonial powers seek to achieve the extermination of the largest part of world’s population is not a reason for inactivity and despair. There are opposite forces actually working to avert the evil plans, cancel the targets, and lead the colonial powers to self-destruction, social chaos, climactic disorder, ultimate implosion, and total decomposition. Constituting a continuation of the Shanghai Five, which started in 1996 as a mutual security agreement between China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, and Tajikistan, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) consists in the greatest alliance in the History of Mankind as it represents more than 40% of the world’s population and almost 25% of the global GDP.
Offering a multi-level synergy in diverse fields, such as security, economy and cultural cooperation, SCO was launched in 2001 with the additional engagement of Uzbekistan; it was considerably enlarged in 2017 with the participation of Pakistan and India as full members. Observer status was offered to Mongolia (2004), Pakistan, India and Iran (2005), Afghanistan (2012) and Belarus (2015). Dialogue partner status was extended to Sri Lanka (2009), Turkey (2012), Armenia, Azerbaijan, Cambodia and Nepal (2015).
SCO expanded in parallel with the groundbreaking Belt and Road Initiative (OBOR) and in cooperation with the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU: Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Belarus and Armenia as members and Uzbekistan, Moldova and Cuba as observers). On 17th September 2021, Iran was accepted as full member state (the technical and legal processes may take more than a year to be completed) and Egypt, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia were granted dialogue partner status.
Tacikistan’ın başkenti Duşanbe’de Şangay İşbirliği Örgütü’nün (ŞİÖ) Devlet Başkanları Zirvesi düzenlendi. Zirve toplantısına katılan İran Cumhurbaşkanı İbrahim Reisi (solda), Tacikistan Cumhurbaşkanı İmamali Rahman (sağda) tarafından karışlandı. ( İran Cumhurbaşkanlığı – Anadolu Ajansı )
Governed by consensus, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization is not the anti-NATO or anti-EU as many people think; however, if we take into consideration the brilliant failures of NATO where one member sabotages the goals of the other and the final impasse of the European Union where every plan has been in deadlock after the European refugee crisis (2015) and the Brexit referendum (2016), no one needs to repeat the experience of these two bodies or to function similarly. The Turkish-Greek row for the case of NATO and the courageous, constant and resolute opposition of the Visegrad Group to the Brussels authorities constitute the perfect examples in this regard.
Being a forum for cooperation, synergy and engagement rather than a typical regional alliance, SCO will be able to gradually encompass Southeast Asia and Africa, thus leaving US, UK, Canada, Australia, France and Holland to implode all on their own. To mark an outstanding success as the world’s first superpower with human face and without colonial past, Beijing must steadily maintain a multilayered approach to international affairs, distinguishing bilateral alliance from multilateral cooperation.
Drawing on hitherto successes and capitalizing on its enormous resources, China must act as the liberating force within a world plagued with colonial divisions, racist concepts, discriminatory prejudices, delusional Euro-centric theories, and historical falsifications. Creating the image of a popular superpower, China must build on Education, Culture, Intellect, Science, Humanity and Justice, unveiling to all and demolishing forever the myths, the delusions, the aberrations and the forgeries that supported the West European and North American colonial adventure, i.e. mankind’s worst nightmare.
The present article consists in a brief outlook of the nature of the diverse educational systems either in the rising and falling imperial realms or in the chaotic and worthless republics that lack sanctity, legitimacy, and humanity. Here you will find its third part. The earlier two parts you can read here:
This series of articles will be completed with the fourth part which will be published shortly.
XVII. An Example of Failed State with no Historical Education: the Ottoman Empire opposite the Rum Mutiny that the French and the English termed ‘Greek Revolution’
An excellent example of 19th – 20th c. failed state is the Ottoman Empire.
First, the idiotic, corrupt and worthless sultans and their ignorant and pathetic sheikhulislams thought erroneously that, as Muslims, they would have the favor and the blessings of God against the Rum ‘infidels’ (gâvur), who -incited by the English and the French- rebelled in the South Balkan confines in 1821; that was silly and absurd. As a matter of fact, the Ottoman Empire did not represent Islam, but the shame of Islam. And the use of the term gâvur for the Christian Orthodox Rumlar reveals the attitude of a Satanist, not a Muslim.
The local, ignorant and paranoid elite of Ottoman Constantinople (the city was finally named officially ‘Istanbul’ only thanks to Kemal Ataturk) thought that they believed in the religion preached by prophet Muhammad, but in reality they believed in irrelevant, useless and heretic theological teachings that were dated many centuries after the death of prophet Muhammad. The consequences of the Ottoman evildoing were noticed quite soon: in 1826, the pseudo-Islamic Constantinopolitan theological cholera forced the Sultan to massacre the Janissaries and to ban the Bektashi Order; and in 1828, the secession of the (fabricated by the Anglo-French) pseudo-state of Greece was a fact. It was merely the normal consequence.
The Janissaries were the only force able to save the Ottoman Empire.
It would surely appear awkward that a state and a government, which were so profoundly characterized by self-ignorance and lack of knowledge of their own country’s History, could possibly know their enemies, bother to learn the history of their enemies’ proxies, and be smart enough to study and outdo the historical lies diffused by their enemies. However, I intend to herewith offer few paradigms of incredible and only self-disastrous Ottoman ignorance, indifference and complacency that brought the entire empire down. I will limit the paradigms of Ottoman lack of elementary historical education, and of its catastrophic consequences only to the rather minor case of the secession of ‘Greece’ in 1828. Far more important case was indeed the secession of Misir/Egypt, following Napoleon’s invasion of the Valley of the Nile in 1798; this was so. because of Misir’s/Egypt’s very important geo-strategic location.
Jean Baptiste van Mour, Grand Vizier: the Ottoman Empire in the 19th c. was an enormous and dysfunctional state with superb pomp and abject content. Examined with 14th c. criteria (Timurid Empire) or 8th c. standards (Abbasid Empire), Ottoman Constantinople in the 19th c. was the capital of a failed state.
XVIII. Adamantios Korais: the Ottoman Native, who fabricated the language that sent the Ottoman Eastern Romans (Rumlar), transformed into Modern Greeks, up to the outskirts of Ankara 100 years later
Second, the Ottoman authorities believed that the outcome of the confrontation with the Eastern Roman (Rumlar) rebels of Mora (Peloponnesus) would be determined exclusively in the battlefield; that was a pathetic and ludicrous assumption. In fact, the independence of the pseudo-Greek state had been prepared several decades before 1828 in France’s colonial pseudo-universities whereby a fake Modern Greek language was fabricated by Adamantios Korais (1748-1833), an Izmir-born Eastern Roman peddler recruited by the secret services of France for the purpose of the progressive dissolution of the Ottoman Empire.
However, the worthless Ottomans knew nothing about all that, caring only about their material possessions, their Satanic harem, and their fake religion that had nothing in common with Islam (being merely a false reading and a magnificence ignorance of it). Quite idiotically, the Ottomans believed that their insidious deeds would be enough to save them; but as it is well-known, fake religions only destroy those who believe them and they never saved anyone.
Adamantios Korais
After his studies, Korais undertook the fabrication of a pseudo-language with French syntax- grammar-usage and Greek vocabulary, eliminating the bulk of the then existing linguistic treasure among the indigenous local Eastern Romans (Rumlar) of the Ottoman Empire’s South Balkan confines, only for the sake of a theoretical, racist ‘Greek’ (‘Hellenic’) purity. This inhuman fact reveals -in and by itself- the inhuman absurdity of the ‘political nation’; if Korais’ linguistic construction was taught to the Zulus, the Zulus would be comfortably presented as ‘descendants of the ‘Ancient Greeks’ by the perfidious Anglo-French gangsters. But, as we know, the Zulus did not have the correct color! However, the stupid Sultan and the idiotic sheikhulislam had no clue about all these developments, because they did not care about the down-to-Earth reality, but about their nonsensical and delusional, pseudo-Islamic theological doctrines and aberrations.
It was then obvious that one of the most important components of the Ottoman Empire, namely the Eastern Romans (Rumlar) of the South Balkan Peninsula, was -at least partly- targeted for cultural extinction and spiritual genocide by the French colonial gangsters. The pre-fabricated linguistic monster, i.e. the fake Modern Greek language, would apparently be later imposed as national and official language throughout the state that France, England and Russia would produce in due course of time.
But the naïve, ignorant and insensible Ottoman authorities could not possibly grasp the colossal tsunami that the Anglo-French colonial gangsters were unleashing against the Ottoman Empire; this was apparently an enormous tsunami that would make the obsolete and otherwise useless state of the comical and egopathic sultans and the paranoid and pseudo-Islamic authority of the villainous, deleterious and evil sheikhulislams shake from its foundations. Those idiots wanted to rule and represent the entire Islamic world, but they were absolute incapable of understanding what it meant that the English and the French academics, intellectuals, diplomats and agents were mentoring selected Eastern Roman (Rum) Orthodox natives of the Ottoman Empire, teaching them that they were the descendants of the Ancient Greeks (which was then known to all that it was an enormous lie) and that they would deserve an independent state of gigantic proportions.
And this is actually what happened between 1787, when Korais submitted his doctoral thesis, and 1828, when the ethnically heterogeneous Slavic-, Arvanitic-, Turkish-, Vlach- and other idioms-speaking Eastern Romans of South Rumeli became independent. It took only 40 years for the Anglo-French criminals to sign the death warranty of the unsuspecting, brainless, and lethargic sultans, who were lost in their delusion of being the ‘defenders of Islam’, while being unable to discern what was going on under their nose. But the useless Ottoman Empire, which is the best example to avoid, was a so dysfunctional and so purposeless state that could not monitor any act and deed undertaken by its own enemies in view of its demise.
XIX. Fallmerayer: the German Historian who unveiled the Truth about the Fake Greeks in 1830, met the Sultan, but was not appointed as Ottoman Grand Vizier
Third, even worse, the pseudo-Muslim imbeciles of the Ottoman Empire, after losing the provinces of Egypt and Greece, still did not understand anything and continued living in their pseudo-Islamic darkness, ignorance and barbarism. In 1830, one of Europe’s foremost historians, Jakob Philipp Fallmerayer (1790-1861), published the first volume of his legendary treatise ‘Geschichte der Halbinsel Morea während des Mittelalters’ (History of the Morea Peninsula during the Middle Ages). In his masterpiece, he expanded much, presenting all the important historical sources that fully demonstrate that the South Balkan Rum population, which was viciously called ‘Greeks’ (‘Hellenes’) by the academic, intellectual and diplomatic elites of France and England, was not Greek at all.
Jakob Philipp Fallmerayer
Fallmerayer fully demonstrated that the Ancient Greeks were exterminated during the overwhelming persecution of pagans in the Roman Empire; that event lasted from the times of Constantine I (306-337) to the reign of Justinian I (527-565) and further on, until the end of the 8th c., when the few hundreds of remaining pagans resisted being christened and were executed in the extreme southern confines of Morea (Peloponnesus) Peninsula.
The great German historian specified that the physical elimination of the Ancient Greeks was not only a matter of persecution and physical extermination due to their vividly polytheistic and Anti-Christian beliefs, their insolent cult practices, and their daily activities; as a matter of fact, the final and irreversible extinction of the Ancient Greeks from the entire South Balkan Peninsula was due to the severe depopulation caused because of the numerous invasions and migrations, which took place throughout Europe for a period of at least 700 years, namely 100-800 CE.
By systematically and extensively referring to the Eastern Roman Emperor Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus (920-959), who was a prominent scholar and a consummate historian, Fallmerayer revealed some of the most important historical sources that bear witness to the fact that all the modern inhabitants of the Morea Peninsula are basically of Slavic origin; today’s revivalist Anglo-French colonials and their pseudo-Greek stooges and scullions may ridiculously call Morea Peninsula ‘Peloponnesus’, but the truth is that, when the Slavic ancestors of today’s pseudo-Greeks settled there around 600 CE, the land was almost totally uninhabited.
Focusing on later periods, the prominent German historian highlighted the Albanian, Vlach and Turkic migrations and the settlement of these migrant populations in the lands that were selected by the English and French colonial gangsters in order to set up their vassal, pseudo-Greek statelet. In fact, only two years after Fake Greece was instituted, Fallmerayer annulled the reasons of its genocidal existence. This is the most spectacular conclusion that Europe’s leading early 19th c. historian drew:
“Das Geschlecht der Hellenen ist in Europa ausgerottet. Schönheit der Körper, Sonnenflug des Geistes, Ebenmaß und Einfalt der Sitte, Kunst, Rennbahn, Stadt, Dorf, Säulenpracht und Tempel, ja sogar der Name ist von der Oberfläche des griechischen Kontinents verschwunden…. auch nicht ein Tropfen echten und ungemischten Hellenenblutes in den Adern der christlichen Bevölkerung des heutigen Griechenlands fließet”.
A rough English translation reads:
“The race of the Hellenes has been exterminated in Europe. Beauty of the body, sun flight of the spirit, symmetry and simplicity of custom, art, racecourse, city, village, colonnade and temple, yes even the name has disappeared from the surface of the Greek continent … not even a drop of real and unmixed Hellenic blood flows in the veins of the Christian population of today’s Greece”.
Immediately, there was an enormous, hysterical reaction against Fallmerayer, his books, and his perfectly well documented and solid argumentation; this was due to the fact that his magnificent opus revealed the truth about the nefarious Anglo-French conspiracy against the Ottoman Empire and also about the crime committed by the genocidal state of Fake Greece against the non-Greek inhabitants of the seceded territories, who were exposed to the forced, tyrannical, monstrous and hideous process of Hellenization. All the various puppets, stooges, and lackeys of the colonial regimes throughout Europe were bribed, commanded and mobilized in order to save the Frankenstein-like, monstrous pseudo-nation that the evil ateliers and the bogus-universities of France and England had just manufactured. It was then that the pathetic pseudo-state of ‘Greece’ hired several ignorant and ridiculous scullions like Constantine Paparrigopoulos to pen a diatribe against the leading European scholar, who had just proved that the illusory pseudo-state ‘Greece’ should not exist.
As the one of the world’s most authoritative historians, Fallmerayer encountered king Otto I of Greece in 1847 and few months later, he was summoned by Sultan Abdulmejid I (1839-1861; Birinci Abdülmecid / (عبد المجيد اول, who offered a Certificate of Honor to the German scholar. But what was the effect of the entire story on the Ottoman Empire’s decision-making and national defense against the Anglo-French machinations? Nothing! The Ottoman administration, influenced by the villainous pseudo-Islamic theologians, was genuinely unable to comprehend that the future of the Ottoman Empire hinged on Fallmerayer’s book, and not on the Quran. Instead of translating it into Ottoman Turkish, Arabic, Farsi, Russian, Italian, Spanish, French and English, to use it as a means of denunciation of the Anglo-French monstrosity, they prepared a Certificate of Honor as if scholars and erudite polymaths like the German historian needed extra papers! Instead of carefully studying it in order to assess the unprecedented extent of the colonial menace, they went back to their fully useless five prayers per day! Instead of concluding about the correct counter-measures to the formation of the pseudo-Greek state, the Ottomans did nothing! That’s why 100 years later there was no Ottoman Empire – thank God!
XX. Dimitrios Byzantios’ Babylonia: an Ottoman Rum’s (Eastern Roman’s) Play that reconfirmed Fallmerayer’s Historical Verdict
Only six years after the publication of Fallmerayer’s outstanding study, an Eastern Roman Orthodox intellectual, author, and Ottoman native, born in Istanbul in 1790, came to give the final, irreversible and permanent blow to the credibility of the prefab pseudo-state of Greece. This came in another form – not as a historical analysis and synthesis, but as literary reflection of the daily life of the various indigenous people, who lived at the time in the South Balkan provinces of the Ottoman Empire and spoke many different languages, being therefore totally unable to understand one another.
Dimitrios Haji-Aslan Konstantinoğlu (later known as Dimitrios Byzantios, 1790-1853) was an Eastern Roman Orthodox polymath, fluent in his native Eastern Roman (Romeika / ρωμέικα) language and in several other languages, notably Ottoman Turkish, Farsi and Arabic. Like all the other Eastern Romans (Rumlar) of the Ottoman Empire, he knew very well that he was not ‘Greek’, that his mother tongue was not ‘Greek’, and that at those days in the South Balkan territories of the Ottoman Empire, which became independent in 1828, many different nations lived speaking different languages from province to province, from city to city, and from village to village.
Dimitrios Haji-Aslan Konstantinoğlu was a distinguished member of the Ottoman elite and administration; in the 1810s, he served in Tunis as interpreter of the local bey – a high rank of the imperial administration at the local level. When the English and the French instigated the Morea Peninsula mutiny in 1821, he went there and managed to be a member of the illegal, clandestine and self-styled ‘Peloponnesian Senate’, i.e. a group of fanciful murderers, Anglo-French stooges, local landowners, activists, rascals and criminals, who -performing under systematized and incessant Anglo-French guidance and interference- supposedly impersonated the ‘elected authorities’ of the otherwise nonexistent Greek nation. Not one man elected those terrorists; yet, they wanted to lead the ‘struggle’ for the delusional liberation of an area inhabited by an overwhelming majority of Muslim and Christian loyalists, who very much loved their country, i.e. the Ottoman Empire, being unwilling to betray their ancestral land and disobey the Ottoman authorities just for the villainous interests of the English and the French bastards.
Dimitrios Byzantios
Although the personal motives of Dimitrios Haji-Aslan Konstantinoğlu cannot be described as very clear with respect to the secession of the South Balkans’ Eastern Roman Orthodox Ottoman natives, we can be sure that he deplored the fake state of Greece in which he found himself in 1828. Although in the 1830s he had good connections with the royal administration and he served in several important positions, he was slandered by several people, who hated and envied him, and then dismissed from his position in Rumeli (Phocis), which is quite normal, taking into consideration that most of the persons around him were ignorant shepherds, idiotic farmers, naïve seamen, lawless plunderers, criminal rapscallions, and former gangsters. For the last two decades of his life, he lived as painter of churches in various parts of Western Greece.
Of course, he had to be renamed as Dimitrios Byzantios, after the purist, racist pseudo-Greek state’s processes during which dozens of thousands of toponyms and personal names were dictatorially and inhumanely changed in order to ‘prove’ as ‘correct’ the fallacious ‘Hellenic’ indoctrination, which had been fabricated by the Anglo-French academia in order to become the foundation stone of the pseudo-Greek statelet. ‘Byzantios’ meant ‘Istanbulite’ or ‘Constantinopolitan’, after the pathetic, pseudo-historical revivalism, which has ever been the disreputable, genocidal and necrolatrous dogma of Modern ‘Greece’.
Why this name was invented to replace the real surname of the great author and intellectual is simple to grasp. The geographical location of Istanbul-Constantinople was mythologized during the Antiquity as founded by the imaginary king Byzas; it was therefore named Byzantion and inhabited by colons from Megara, an Ancient Dorian Greek city. ‘Byzantios’ being an adjective derived from ‘Byzantion’ was used as surname in order to purify the Turkish names ‘Haji-Aslan Konstantinoğlu’, which -in and by themselves- proved that first, the pseudo-Greek state was inhumanely racist and second, Dimitrios Byzantios was not a descendant of Ancient Greeks, but an Eastern Roman Orthodox Christian irreversibly amalgamated with the various Turkic migrants and Islamized Eastern Roman inhabitants of the Ottoman Empire.
XXI. The Tragic Revelations of Dimitrios Byzantios’ Babylonia about the Fake Statelet of Modern Greece
Dimitrios Haji-Aslan Konstantinoğlu ‘Byzantios’ published ‘Babylonia’ in 1836. This is the chronologically first masterpiece of literature produced in the pseudo-state of Modern Greece. As a play, Babylonia features various Eastern Roman Orthodox characters originating from different parts of the Ottoman Empire and the then seceded, tiny state of ‘Greece’; they all meet in the first capital of the new statelet, namely Mora Yenişehri (Italian: ‘Napoli di Romania’ / English: Nauplia) as Nafplion was then named. But unfortunately, they cannot understand one another, because their languages are different, their traditions, behavioral systems, and lifestyles diverge enormously, and consequently they miscommunicate and fight against one another. The encounter and the interaction of these theatrical characters in the play underscore the historical reality and highlight the Anglo-French colonial crime; in addition, they constitute a real prophecy about what happened in that cursed land that fell victim of the racist Anglo-French machinations. Modern pseudo-Greeks of the prefab fake state have ceaselessly fought one upon another and pitilessly killed one another for almost two centuries in exactly the same manner the illustrious Constantinopolitan playwright’s characters do in Dimitrios Byzantios’ fascinating and enthralling Babylonia.
The only truth is that there were no Greeks in South Balkans in the early 1800s. The different Christian Orthodox Rumlar (Eastern Romans) of the various regions of the Ottoman Empire were speaking languages that diverged from one another pretty much like Castilian (Spanish) differs from Catalan, Portuguese, and Galician. If no foreign colonial intervention took place, these different languages would generate over the span of about a century several modern nations, because the thriving, educated and prosperous Eastern Romans of Pontus, Cappadocia, Ionia-Aeolia and Istanbul, Macedonia, Albania and Epirus, Rumeli, Mora, Cyprus, Crete and Calabria were in fact speaking 10 different languages. Almost all these nations were culturally massacred and linguistically exterminated within the Cemetery of Nations called ‘Greece’ through the imposition of the fake ‘Modern Greek’ language that the vicious renegade Adamantios Korais produced working as a slave of the French academic Satanists. About:
And this is exactly why the title of the theatrical masterpiece is ‘Babylonia’! It has nothing to do with Ancient Babylon and the History of Mesopotamia! It is only an allusion to the Judeo-Christian narrative of the Tower of Babel; it was there where all the people started speaking many different languages and failing to understand one another. And Dimitrios Byzantios, as a visionary and pragmatist at the same time, tells us with his splendidly apocalyptic-eschatological play that the pseudo-Greek state is doomed to collapse, being punished by God, and to disappear in chaos, disorder and panic.
Thus, similarly with the Tower of Babel and following the Rum Mutiny, the “chaos” came to Mora Yenişehir – Nafplio in 1828. The plot is quite simple, but the play is incredibly rich at the linguistic level and very critical at the historical-national level. According to the story, many people meet in a lokanta (i.e. a restaurant; this word was among the thousands of words that were banned for all 19th c. Eastern Romans who happened to be entrapped in the pseudo-Greek state). The lokanta is located, as I already said, in Nafplio – Mora Yenişehir; the characters are Orthodox Christians. They are happy because the fleets of France, Britain and Russia have just won a victory over the Ottomans, but they will soon end up in the jail, after fighting against one another. So, the plot is set after the naval battle in Navarino (Naval Battle). About:
The theatrical story was as a matter of fact the daily reality of all Eastern Roman Orthodox natives across the Ottoman Empire. They used the language of the Christian scriptures for religious purposes, but it was a dead language. It was no longer the mother tongue of anybody. They used the terminology of the last Eastern Roman Orthodox Emperors of Constantinople to write official documents among themselves; but that language (Early Eastern Roman) was a dead language too. It was no longer the mother tongue of anyone. And they spoke Ottoman Turkish to communicate with the Ottoman authorities.
However, their mother tongues were numerous and differed from place to place, being different amalgamations of various components: Slavic, Albanian, Vlach, Turkish, Greek, Latin, Venetian, Arabic, and other. They all identified themselves as Eastern Romans (Romioi-Romii/Ρωμιοί/Rumlar); accepting the Constantinople Patriarchate as their supreme religious authority, they were all Christian Orthodox, but, as it happened, an Eastern Roman (Romios/Rum) from Crete and an Eastern Roman (Romios/Rum) from Yanya (Ioannina) did not speak the same language. Sometimes, two Eastern Romans (Romii/Rumlar) were speaking in Ottoman Turkish to better communicate between themselves.
If all these people were to become independent and secede from the Ottoman Empire, there had to be many small states (each of them having approximately the size of Montenegro, Slovenia or Albania) and each small state would have a different language (as different as Neapolitan is from Sicilian, Sardinian and Venetian). This would be the normal, natural, historical development and the true wishes of all the populations, which were disastrously deceived to sell their soul (identity) to the devil (the pseudo-state of Greece) for the mere reward of ceaseless Anglo-French lies, shameful and ridiculous praises of their fake ancestral ‘achievements’, and vain promises from the ‘Greek’ politicians.
Because of the racist purification process, which was a most totalitarian aberration, many thousands of rebels lived in the mountains in ‘Greece’ for many decades after the pseudo-independence (1828) to remain clean from the nauseating filth, the hellish depravity, and the fatal corruption of the pseudo-independent statelet. They were incessantly fighting heroically against the Bavarian and the Danish kings that the perfidious English imposed in their ‘pseudo-Greek’ colony, and they were brave enough to repeatedly deliver many merciless blows to the evil regime of Athens. Finally, all the Eastern Roman languages that existed on the soil of the pseudo-state disappeared around the end of the 19th c. and the beginning of the 20th c., following the white terrorism practiced by the Athens dictators. This was what happened in the South Balkan Ottoman provinces, after the French and British expelled the Ottomans from there.
By mere coincidence (!?!), the ‘Greek’ film director’s name (Yorgos Dizikirikis) is entirely Turkish; ‘diz kırığı’ (diz+kırık) means ‘the man who broke his knee’ in Turkish. Say ‘cheers’ to the South Balkans’ Greek monkeys! About:
Consequently, the aforementioned points conclude the case for the pseudo-Greek colonial state that the English and the French created, maintained, and helped expand as per their agenda. The attitude of many political scientists, Human Rights activists, humanitarian intellectuals, and political commentators, who happen to focus only on the racist state’s attitude toward a) the Turkish minority in Western Thrace, b) the Macedonian minority in Greek Macedonia, and c) the Cham Albanian minority in Chameria (Epirus), is a disastrous mistake and a deplorable oversight.
Long before the fake state of Greece persecuted the Western Thrace Turks, long before it carried out a 100-year long genocide against the Macedonian nation, long before it attempted the extinction of the Vlachs in Thessaly and elsewhere, and long before it expropriated the Cham Albanians from their own lands, this same fanatical, vindictive, discriminatory, racist, revivalist and irredentist administration, which had been methodically fabricated in disreputable and criminal institutions in France and England, did indeed carry out an enormous, multifaceted, and enduring genocide across its 1828 territories in a most inhuman and devilish attempt to
A- obliterate the local languages, cultures, traditions, values, and behavioral systems of the indigenous subject population,
B- delete the genuine Eastern Roman (romeiki) identity and integrity of the same population, and
C- impose on their subjects
i- the prefabricated nationalistic-chauvinistic dogma,
ii- the historical forgery that the English and the French academics taught them, and iii- the entirely fake Modern Greek identity.
In fact, the so-called combatants of the Rum mutiny (1821-1828) did not liberate but actually enslaved the unfortunate and ill-fated locals. And this is exactly what is perfectly well illustrated in Babylonia by Dimitrios Byzantios.
XXII. The Tragic Revelations of Dimitrios Byzantios’ Babylonia about the Failed Ottoman Empire
If the above criticism concerns the modern state of Greece, what follows offers the chance to see the historical developments from another viewpoint. It is therefore time to ask now how the Ottoman Empire reacted to the fact that an outstanding Ottoman administrator moved to the seceded statelet and, after participating in the events of the period 1821-1828 and serving from various positions afterwards, he felt obliged to write a play in order to decry the absurd, self-contradictory, and highly pre-occupying situation that was created there following the secession of the said state.
The Ottoman authorities simply did not get any info about this valuable book/play at the time. This shows that they did not perceive the Anglo-French colonial threat at the time. Even worse, today’s Turkish authorities still have no clue about Dimitrios Byzantios’ Babylonia and its deep meaning; this shows that the state created by Kemal Ataturk malfunctioned after 1938, because Turkey did not serve the purposes and did not achieve the targets that its founder set for all Turks. About: https://www.academia.edu/44743768/Kemal_Ataturk_1938_2020_the_World_s_Greatest_20th_century_Statesman_betrayed_by_Islamists_Pan_Turanianists_and_Kemalists
Due to their ignorance of the aforementioned books and because of their total inability to understand the down-to-earth reality, we can safely claim that the worthless advisers around the Sultan did not realize, back in the 1830s, that what had already taken place was not geared to be only an isolated circumstance, but in order to be continued.
Being indoctrinated with their fake Sunna, intoxicated with tons of pseudo-Islamic theology, characterized by ignorance because of the abolition of sciences in the Ottoman Empire after 1580, incapacitated due to their lack of learning, knowledge, exploration and study of the ‘Other’, plunged in absolute darkness thanks to their erroneous reading of the Quran, and invaded by incommensurate volume of Satanic pride and arrogance (this was the result of their delusional belief that they were good Muslims whereas they were worse than hyenas and wild dogs), the egotistic and inane Constantinopolitan theologians around the sheikhulislam and the sultan thought that the loss of Greece in 1828 was merely an isolated phenomenon, and not part of an entire agenda providing for the total and final demise of the Ottoman Empire.
These evil and inhuman Ottoman theologians, who were incapable of anything related to common sense, scientific method, and down-to-earth reality, wanted still to have a say in the governance of an empire of which they could only trigger the death, due to their ignorance and uselessness. In reality, they were the best agents and stooges of the English and the French, because without even being on the payroll of Paris and London, they fully played into their game.
Unfortunately, Kemal Ataturk came too late and was too sentimental, too humane and too merciful. He should have killed all the sheikhs, imams and students of pseudo-Islamic theological schools throughout Turkey. He should have closed down all the mosques and madrassas, prohibited all types of study of Islam (because they were all wrong, sick, corrupt and absolutely anti-Islamic), introduced unbiased and non-partisan History of Religions as the means to study the Islamic religion too, and prohibited the possession of any theological books written in Arabic across the country that he saved. The Ottoman Empire’s pseudo-Islamic theological establishment should have been reduced to extinction, because it was the sole responsible for the progressive dismemberment of the vast state.
The 19th c. was indeed a period of increased involvement of the theologians around the sheikhulislam in the governance of the Ottoman Empire; this fact contributed to the destruction of the Ottoman state because, by spreading ignorance, idiocy and incapacity, the useless sheikhs and imams played exactly into the evil Anglo-French colonial anti-Ottoman game.
Therefore, Dimitrios Byzantios’ Babylonia fully demonstrated that already in 1828 the Ottoman Empire was an absolutely impermissible state. Its apathy would sooner or later drive it to nonexistence, and there was nothing more anyone could possibly do about it. The useless empire had to be instantly dissolved in order to prevent the calamities that fell upon all its inhabitants irrespective of origin, identity, language and religion. It is well known and accepted by all that, between 1828 and 1923, across the Ottoman Empire, many hundreds of thousands of people were killed in internal clashes and undeservedly massacred. This was evidently scheduled as per the Anglo-French colonial maneuvers and machinations; however, had the Ottoman authorities been different, i.e. had they been elucidated, better versed in spirituality, moral, culture, education and sciences, and therefore able to discern clearly, they would have certainly been able to outfox the plot.
In fact, you cannot combine the tenebrous theological contamination of Ahmad Ibn Taymiyyah with any aspect of human civilization or superior intellect. The Constantinopolitan theologians of the Ottoman Empire were barbaric and un-Islamic. The only chance of survival that the Islamic Caliphate had after 1580 would be a sultan/caliph, who would not be held captive of those evil theologians, but able to work with along the Janissaries, the Bektashis and the Mevlevis to physically eliminate the entire theological class, which in any case was totally impermissible in the true, original Islam, as preached and practiced by prophet Muhammad.
XXIII. How the Ottoman Authorities would use Dimitrios Byzantios’ Babylonia, if they were not indoctrinated with Pseudo-Islamic Theology
Dimitrios Byzantios’ Babylonia should have been an alarming warning for the Ottomans. If the populations of the seceded lands were forced to become ‘Greek’, then practically speaking, any Eastern Roman Christian Ottoman could eventually be forced to also become ‘Greek’. The Ottoman administration and elite did not only have to get a copy, translate it to Ottoman Turkish, and duly study it, but they should also popularize it extensively among the other Eastern Roman Christian Orthodox populations, expansively analyze it to them, and fraternally warn them that, by becoming ‘Greek’, they would gradually be pulled back to the Ancient Greek polytheism, pedophilia, prostitution, fornication, Dionysian orgies, bloody political divisions, and homosexuality.
In this manner, with solemn condemnations and mass meetings every Sunday outside the churches of every Ottoman city, they should mobilize not the Muslims but the Christians of the Ottoman Empire against the pseudo-state of ‘Greece’. Orthodox Christian populations of the Ottoman Empire should be alarmed against the anti-Christian, pseudo-Greek state much more than the Muslim populations. Every Christian inhabitant of the Ottoman Empire should come to know that his daughters would become prostitutes, if their region happened to be targeted by the English and the French as the next step of expansion of the Athens regime. A Christian-Muslim alliance should be built against the anti-Christian statelet that was a mere instrument at the hands of the English and the French.
Having to oppose the plots of France and England after the fabrication of the pseudo-Greek state, the Ottoman administration did not use the real tools that they possessed. They stupidly thought, as I already said, that this would be a matter of military movements and diplomatic efforts; this aberration was lethal indeed for the Ottoman Empire. Why the Ottomans did not use the tools that they surely had is easy to assess; the evil pseudo-Islamic theologians did not want to study Ancient Greece, Christianity and many other similar topics, because in their stupid heads they had the deeply anti-Islamic belief that “at the end, all the people will become Muslims” and in the back side of their mind, they used to hide their evil intentions to force everyone into accepting Islam – which is totally Satanic. If you are an inhumane idiot and you think that “at the end, all the people will become Muslims”, you don’t need to do anything else except either staying in lethargy for many long years or massacring everyone that the ignorant, Satanic sheikhs order you to kill in the brief intervals.
Mahmud II (1808 1839) in new attire: too little too late!
And this is how the pseudo-Islamic Constantinopolitan theological cholera affected extremely negatively the Ottoman society: those who followed them were plunged indeed into an incredible lethargy interrupted only by few short periods of conflicts and massacres. Many independent European travelers sojourning in parts of the Ottoman Empire for some time during the 19th c. wrote their travelogues afterwards and they thus reported this situation; some among them may have well been agents of the colonial powers, but we cannot afford to discredit them all. Many among them had a truly genuine interest and they were absolutely veracious in their descriptions.
Christian or Muslim, all Ottomans indiscriminately were living in impermissible conditions, and by this I am not referring to the issue of technological modernization, which is not important, but to the troublesome social, socio-behavioral and cultural situation. Compared to the socio-cultural conditions of life in the Abbasid Caliphate 1000 years earlier, Ottomans -during the 19th c.- were simply culturally inferior, spiritually dead, educationally destroyed, socially putrefied, tribally divided, and religiously split along sectarian lines. For all this and for much more, the only responsible were the pseudo-Islamic ‘Sunni’ Constantinopolitan theologians.
Absolute lack of knowledge of the ‘Other’ ends up as misperception and hatred of the ‘Other’; and when a subconscious vision of one’s own lethargy, uselessness, misery, ineptitude and depravity comes to the surface of one’s own consciousness, then the only responsible “is” the “Other”, and in order to “pay”, “he must die”. This explains everything that occurred in the decayed Ottoman Empire during the period 1798-1923. In real historical terms, Kemal Ataturk did not actually abolish the Islamic Caliphate; he simply buried a dead corpse that had been calamitously left on the surface of the Earth way too long (after 1580). Those, who opposed its abolition, were inferior brainless beings with detrimental impact on their societies. Those, who wish an Ottoman revivalism or even worse an Ottoman comeback today, must be de facto acknowledged as fake Muslims and enemies of the Mankind.
In fact, after 1798 and more particularly after 1828, the Ottoman Empire existed hopelessly for another 95 years. It did not have a chance in the centillion (i.e. a number equal to 1 followed by 303 zeros) to possibly survive. Anyone who today imagines that it is possible to open the coffin of the Ottoman misery and revive the putrefied body of that -useless after 1580- state is either mad or possessed by evil demons. The Ottoman Empire is good stuff for Education though; until 1580, it offers a great chance to students of History to examine what it is for a major empire to miss great opportunities. And after 1580, it offers them the possibility to examine how disastrous and lethal a theological indoctrination can be, particularly if it is noticed by enemies.
Mahmud II did not have the necessary education to understand that saving his empire was not a matter of imitation but of true originality.
XXIV. What a Salvation Plan of the Ottoman Empire in 1828 would look like (if a Sultan eliminated the Evil Theologians in the first place!)
What could the Ottoman administration do to successfully prevent most or all of the developments that took place in their European provinces between 1828 and 1914? This question can eventually have a potential response only in case we assume that a forceful, impulsive and unpredictable sultan succeeded with the help of the military to eliminate the pseudo-Islamic theological schools around the sheikhulislam and to exterminate their main followers and supporters, thus imposing a totally different version of Islam than the Ottoman pseudo-Islam of the period after 1580.
Several practical suggestions are mentioned below, covering mainly three sectors:
A. Governance
1- Prevent any French and English from crossing Ottoman territories;
2- Implement an advanced project of national awareness campaigns among all the inhabitants of the empire through use of selected, hired, educated and guided natives from all the nations that lived there;
3- Transform the Ottoman Empire into a multi-national empire whereby all nations would be very conscious of their common, deeply anti-Western values, cultures, traditions and faiths;
4- Incorporate all ethno-linguistic and religious groups into the governance of the vast state and study them extensively;
5- Abolish the useless and self-disastrous system of millets;
6- Promote systematic and extensive inter-ethnic and inter-religious mutual knowledge, understanding and communication, starting from the level of Education;
7- Defame methodically the Western colonial countries by ceaselessly reporting all their crimes, corruption and obscenity to all the inhabitants of the empire;
8- Prepare the conditions for an Ottoman-Iranian merge into one empire that would also comprise the Central Asiatic khanates.
The sacred flag brought to Sultanahmet in the ceremony launched for the implementation of the ridiculous and suicidal fatwah to abolish the Janissaries
B. Education
1- Introduce an Albanian writing system in Ottoman characters and systematize National Education in Albanian for all the populations of today’s Epirus province of Greece, Albania, Kosovo, Sanjak and adjacent territories;
2- Introduce a Vlach writing system in Ottoman characters and systematize National Education in Vlach for all the populations of today’s Thessaly province of Greece and all Vlachs in Macedonia;
3- Introduce a Macedonian writing system in Ottoman characters and systematize National Education in Macedonian for all the populations of Ottoman Macedonia (the Manastir, Kosova and Selanik vilayets);
4- Introduce a Karamanlı writing system in Ottoman characters and systematize National Education in Karamanlı Turkic for the Christian Turkic populations;
5- Introduce (in Greek characters) the writing system of the various Eastern Roman languages in Pontus, Cappadocia, Ionia-Aeolia, Macedonia-Thrace, Crete, and Cyprus;
6- Follow similar policies as regards the Romanians and the Bulgarians early in the 19th c.;
7- Dissociate the Ottoman Empire’s Eastern Romans and the other Christians from the anti-Christian pseudo-state of Greece and reveal to all Christian populations of the Caliphate the deeply Anti-Christian targets of the pseudo-Greek state’s Anglo-French masters
8- Constantly update the Ottoman Empire’s Eastern Romans and the other Christians about how Eastern Romans were culturally humiliated (example: the Don Pacifico affair / https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118885154.dipl0355) and socio-behaviorally disfigured and Westernized in the pseudo-Greek statelet (notably with the ignominious abandonment of the foustanella traditional attire and the orchestrated imposition of the ‘franghika’, i.e. the Parisian bourgeois, supposedly ‘Western’, clothing, which was a development that took place at slow pace during the 19th c. and the early 20th c. as part of the Anglo-French colonization of those South Balkan Ottoman lands).
9- Implement a vast Aramaization program among all the Dialectal Arabic-speaking populations of Syria-Phoenicia, Mesopotamia and Palestine in order to effectively oppose the already evident Anglo-French colonial plans that provided for the linguistic-political Arabization of the Berbers, the Egyptians and the Aramaeans across the Ottoman provinces in Africa and Asia. As none of these historical nations was associated with the Arabs in any manner, their disorientation and captivity within the false ideology of Pan-Arabism, which was generated very early by the French academia, would trigger enormous turmoil in the Ottoman Empire.
Acting as per above, the Ottoman authorities would avert the pernicious Anglo- French infiltration among the empire’s various nations, thus preventing the formation of various secessionist movements, and all the subsequent, disastrous developments. Only by fully integrating the properly formed and educated representatives of the various nations into the process of the imperial administration (see above parts A4, A6 and A7), would the Ottomans be truly able to unify their vast but incoherent and disparate state.
C. Foreign Policy
1- Dispatch well-prepared agents to France, under the coverage of trade or business, with task to study in-depth the languages and the cultures of the various oppressed nations of France, namely the Corsicans, the Occitans, the Catalans, the Basks (Euskadi) and the Bretons, and establish connections with them;
2- Dispatch well-prepared agents to England, under the coverage of trade or business, with task to study in-depth the languages and the cultures of the various oppressed nations of England, namely the Irish, the Scots and the Welsh, and establish connections with them;
3- Invite to the Ottoman Empire many hundreds of representatives of England’s and France’s oppressed nations, prepare, train and guide them adequately, and then send them back in order to launch secessionist movements and trigger turmoil and chaos in both colonial countries;
4- Organize unrest across all formerly Ottoman territories that were detached by the colonial powers (notably Egypt);
5- Establish strong contacts with all Turkic and Muslim nations that were subjugated by the Russians, notably the Tatars, the Circassians, the Chechens and several others, and train them properly to instigate rebellions and chaos inside Russia;
6- Establish strong contacts with all Turkic and Muslim nations that were subjugated by the English in British India and prepare them to revolt against the colonials.
However, it sounds unrealistic to demand the aforementioned measures from the collapsing Ottomans of the 19th c., and it truly is. We have to accept that the lack of real awareness of the lurking dangers that characterized the obsolete structure of the Ottoman Empire was exclusively due to its fake religious authorities, which spread darkness instead of knowledge and hatred instead of love, contrarily to the true preaching of prophet Muhammad. As a matter of fact, we have to admit that the ineptitude, inertia, inappropriateness and incapability of the Ottoman family to rule the empire had already noticed several centuries earlier. These issues did not date back to the 19th c., but much earlier.
The Ottomans did not care to monitor (let alone prevent) the infiltration of the Catholic missionaries among the Aramaean Christians of Syria-Palestine and Mesopotamia already in the middle of the 16th c.; they did not realize the tragic consequences that this evil infiltration generated for an old nation that was divided between the Ottoman and the Safavid empires. And they failed to understand that various types of Western infiltration among the marginalized ethnic and religious components of their state would only herald its demise. As a matter of fact, if the Ottomans failed to defend the nations inhabiting their territories in the 16th c., when they were in the peak of their power, how could they possibly manage to do this in the early 19th c.?
On the contrary, what happened was a disastrous self-destruction: their sectarian theological pseudo-Islamic decisions further alienated the bulk of the Ottoman populations, namely most of the ethno-religious groups and nations (milletler) of the vast empire, from the indoctrinated Constantinopolitan élite that was totally detached from the real world. If we take into consideration the fact that one of the best tactics of the colonial powers is to engulf enemies in sterile, unrealistic and self-catastrophic theological indoctrination, we can conclude that the best tools of the evil colonial powers were the inane pseudo-Islamic ‘Sunni’ theologians of Constantinople who pushed their own country to the abysmal precipice in order to materialize the goals of their demented theories and their evil faith. The same occurs also today in Turkey. That is why I intend to complete this series of articles with the forthcoming presentation of what the pillars of Turkish Education must be in the years ahead, if Turks do not want their country to have the same fate as the defunct Ottoman Empire.
The disreputable fatwa issued by the evil and idiotic şeyhulislam Hasan Hayrullah Efendi for the dethronement of Sultan Abdülaziz: one of the most shameful documents of the Ottoman History
megalommatiscomments 